Ryan A Blaustein1,2, Lisa-Marie Michelitsch3, Adam J Glawe4, Hansung Lee4, Stefanie Huttelmaier4, Nancy Hellgeth4, Sarah Ben Maamar4, Erica M Hartmann4. 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. ryan.blaustein@nih.gov. 2. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. ryan.blaustein@nih.gov. 3. Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria. 4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While indoor microbiomes impact our health and well-being, much remains unknown about taxonomic and functional transitions that occur in human-derived microbial communities once they are transferred away from human hosts. Toothbrushes are a model to investigate the potential response of oral-derived microbiota to conditions of the built environment. Here, we characterize metagenomes of toothbrushes from 34 subjects to define the toothbrush microbiome and resistome and possible influential factors. RESULTS: Toothbrush microbiomes often comprised a dominant subset of human oral taxa and less abundant or site-specific environmental strains. Although toothbrushes contained lower taxonomic diversity than oral-associated counterparts (determined by comparison with the Human Microbiome Project), they had relatively broader antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) profiles. Toothbrush resistomes were enriched with a variety of ARGs, notably those conferring multidrug efflux and putative resistance to triclosan, which were primarily attributable to versatile environmental taxa. Toothbrush microbial communities and resistomes correlated with a variety of factors linked to personal health, dental hygiene, and bathroom features. CONCLUSIONS: Selective pressures in the built environment may shape the dynamic mixture of human (primarily oral-associated) and environmental microbiota that encounter each other on toothbrushes. Harboring a microbial diversity and resistome distinct from human-associated counterparts suggests toothbrushes could potentially serve as a reservoir that may enable the transfer of ARGs. Video abstract.
BACKGROUND: While indoor microbiomes impact our health and well-being, much remains unknown about taxonomic and functional transitions that occur in human-derived microbial communities once they are transferred away from human hosts. Toothbrushes are a model to investigate the potential response of oral-derived microbiota to conditions of the built environment. Here, we characterize metagenomes of toothbrushes from 34 subjects to define the toothbrush microbiome and resistome and possible influential factors. RESULTS: Toothbrush microbiomes often comprised a dominant subset of human oral taxa and less abundant or site-specific environmental strains. Although toothbrushes contained lower taxonomic diversity than oral-associated counterparts (determined by comparison with the Human Microbiome Project), they had relatively broader antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) profiles. Toothbrush resistomes were enriched with a variety of ARGs, notably those conferring multidrug efflux and putative resistance to triclosan, which were primarily attributable to versatile environmental taxa. Toothbrush microbial communities and resistomes correlated with a variety of factors linked to personal health, dental hygiene, and bathroom features. CONCLUSIONS: Selective pressures in the built environment may shape the dynamic mixture of human (primarily oral-associated) and environmental microbiota that encounter each other on toothbrushes. Harboring a microbial diversity and resistome distinct from human-associated counterparts suggests toothbrushes could potentially serve as a reservoir that may enable the transfer of ARGs. Video abstract.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antimicrobial resistance; Built environment; Metagenomics; Oral microbiome; Toothbrush
Authors: Pedro Belda-Ferre; Luis David Alcaraz; Raúl Cabrera-Rubio; Héctor Romero; Aurea Simón-Soro; Miguel Pignatelli; Alex Mira Journal: ISME J Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Shira R Abeles; Refugio Robles-Sikisaka; Melissa Ly; Andrew G Lum; Julia Salzman; Tobias K Boehm; David T Pride Journal: ISME J Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Jenna M Lang; David A Coil; Russell Y Neches; Wendy E Brown; Darlene Cavalier; Mark Severance; Jarrad T Hampton-Marcell; Jack A Gilbert; Jonathan A Eisen Journal: PeerJ Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Sajan C Raju; Sonja Lagström; Pekka Ellonen; Willem M de Vos; Johan G Eriksson; Elisabete Weiderpass; Trine B Rounge Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 5.640