| Literature DB >> 23316203 |
R R Tonelli1, W Colli, M J M Alves.
Abstract
Parasite infections are largely dependent on interactions between pathogen and different host cell populations to guarantee a successful infectious process. This is particularly true for obligatory intracellular parasites as Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, and Leishmania, to name a few. Adhesion to and entry into the cell are essential steps requiring specific parasite and host cell molecules. The large amount of possible involved molecules poses additional difficulties for their identification by the classical biochemical approaches. In this respect, the search for alternative techniques should be pursued. Among them two powerful methodologies can be employed, both relying upon the construction of highly diverse combinatorial libraries of peptides or oligonucleotides that randomly bind with high affinity to targets on the cell surface and are selectively displaced by putative ligands. These are, respectively, the peptide-based phage display and the oligonucleotide-based aptamer techniques. The phage display technique has been extensively employed for the identification of novel ligands in vitro and in vivo in different areas such as cancer, vaccine development, and epitope mapping. Particularly, phage display has been employed in the investigation of pathogen-host interactions. Although this methodology has been used for some parasites with encouraging results, in trypanosomatids its use is, as yet, scanty. RNA and DNA aptamers, developed by the SELEX process (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment), were described over two decades ago and since then contributed to a large number of structured nucleic acids for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes or for the understanding of the cell biology. Similarly to the phage display technique scarce use of the SELEX process has been used in the probing of parasite-host interaction. In this review, an overall survey on the use of both phage display and aptamer technologies in different pathogenic organisms will be discussed. Using these techniques, recent results on the interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi with the host will be highlighted focusing on members of the 85 kDa protein family, a subset of the gp85/TS superfamily.Entities:
Keywords: Kinetoplastidae; SELEX; apicomplexa; aptamers; combinatorial methods for diagnosis and therapy; phage display
Year: 2013 PMID: 23316203 PMCID: PMC3540409 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Parasite targetting by combinatorial techniques. (A) Phage display. A phage library displaying potential ligand proteins on their surface is exposed to an immobilized target (step 1). After washing away unbound phages (step 2), binders are eluted by Escherichia coli infection and plated on LB-agar (step 3). Clones are then amplified producing a phage mixture that is enriched with relevant (i.e., binding) phage (step 4). The repeated cycling of these steps is referred as “panning”. At the end of 3–4 rounds of panning the enriched phage population is recovered by infection of a suitable bacterial host and sequenced to identify the interacting peptides or protein fragments. (B) SELEX. It is based on a stretch of single-stranded nucleic acid, which can be RNA or single-stranded DNA (ss-DNA). These are chemically synthesized to have a random stretch usually from 8 to 40 nucleotides, flanked by constant sequences. In the case of RNA SELEX, the synthetic DNA template is transcribed into a pool of 1013–1014 different RNA molecules (step 1). The pool is incubated with the desired targets and due to the sample diversity some of the aptamers will bind to their targets (step 2). After washing out unbound RNAs (step 3) the different RNA pools are displaced by incubation with ligands of interest (step 4). By reverse transcription (step 5) and PCR amplification (step 6) selected double-stranded DNAs are reconstructed. The same cycle is repeated over 8–12 times until purified sequences specific for a given ligand are selected. The DNAs are cloned and sequenced. This iterative method follows the same logic when single-stranded DNA sequences are used as aptamers instead of RNA (Ulrich and Wrenger, 2009).
Summary of phage display applications in malaria research.
| Mosquito epithelia | Random peptides | Identification of SM1 peptide that inhibits salivary gland invasion by | Ghosh et al., |
| Ookinete surface | Random peptides | Identification of enolase and actin on the surface of ookinetes | Hernandez-Romano et al., |
| Parasitized erythrocyte | Random peptides | Identification of a peptide that binds to the surface of | Eda et al., |
| Erythrocyte surface proteins | Identification of | Li et al., | |
| Purified human erythrocyte protein 4.1 | Identification of EBA-175, EBL-1 and a Ser/Thr kinase as ligands for protein 4.1 | Lauterbach et al., | |
| AMA-1 | Random peptides | Identification of peptides that bind AMA-1 and inhibit parasite invasion of erythrocytes; structure determination of AMA-1 epitope targets of inhibitory human antibodies | Nair et al., |
| Mouse antibodies | Identification of four antibodies specific for | Sabo et al., | |
| Anti-AMA-1 and anti-rhoptry mAbs | Random peptides | Identification and structural elucidation of AMA-1 mimics. Antibodies to mimotopes that inhibit erythrocyte invasion by | Narum et al., |
| CSP | Phage library of CSP peptides | Induction of a strong and specific immune response. Structure determination of a CSP epitope | Greenwood et al., |
| MSP | Human and mouse antibodies | Isolation of three antibodies against MSP-3 and MSP-1 that inhibit parasite growth | Sowa et al., |
| Random peptides | Identification of MSP mimotopes | Demangel et al., | |
| SERA5 enzyme | Random peptides | Identification of a peptide that binds the catalytic domain of the enzyme and affects intraerythrocytic development | Fairlie et al., |
| Pfs48/45 protein | Human antibodies from malaria-immune patients | Isolation of a scFV that reacts with sexual stages of | Roeffen et al., |
| Duffy binding protein (DBP) | Human antibodies from malaria-immune patients | Identification of three scFV that binds (DBP) inhibiting adhesion of RBCs | Kim et al., |
Summary of phage display applications in .
| Sera of | Identification of epitopes of the | Beghetto et al., | |
| Sera of | Identification of an epitope GRA1 protein | Beghetto et al., | |
| Anti- | Identification of an epitope of GRA3 located in the dense granules of | Robben et al., | |
| Random peptides | Identification of a linear epitope within SAG2A that is expressed in | Cunha-Junior et al., | |
| TgMIC2 | Mouse antibodies from | Identification of scFV antibodies that recognize TgMIC2 | Hoe et al., |
Summary of phage display applications in .
| Identification of antibodies that recognize | Chen et al., | ||
| Human semi-synthetic phage display antibody libraries | Isolation of scFv antibodies that block infection of HCT-8 cells by | Pokorny et al., | |
| Sporozoite surface antigen S16 and P23 | Human semi-synthetic phage display antibody libraries | Isolation and identification of scFV antibodies that bind to | Boulter-Bitzer et al., |
| Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) | Identification of a surface adherence protein (CP12) from sporozoites | Yao et al., |
Summary of phage display applications in .
| Random peptides | Identification of PW2 peptide with activity against | da Silva et al., | |
| Chicken scFV antibodies from | Isolation of an scFV antibody that binds specifically to | Abi-Ghanem et al., | |
| Cryopreserved | Chicken scFV antibodies from | Identification of antibody fragments with high specificity and binding capacity for soluble antigens and intact fixed merozoites | Zhao et al., |
| Anti-GAM56 protein | Identification of EtGAM22 expressed predominantly at the gametocyte stage | Krucken et al., |
Summary of phage display applications in research with .
| Mouse vascular bed | Hybrid phage displaying the FLY domain | FLY interacts with the endothelium in an organ-dependent manner with a preference for the heart vasculature | Tonelli et al., |
| TcTS-specific antibodies and anti-SAPA mAbs | Random peptides | Identification of B-cell epitopes located on TcTS and the SAPA antigen | Pitcovsky et al., |
| Sera of | Random peptides | Identification of epitopes of the | Van Nieuwenhove et al., |
Summary of the applications of aptamers on protozoan parasite research.
| 2′-F-dU/dc-RNA | 50–70% inhibition of epithelial cell invasion by | Ulrich et al., | |
| 2′-F-dU/dc-RNA | Development of an aptamer-based concentration method for the detection of | Nagarkatti et al., | |
| 2′-F-dU/dC-RNA | Identification of an aptamer family that binds to a flagellar pocket component. Aptamer internalization through the lysosome pathway | Homann and Goringer, | |
| Preparation of VSG variants | 2′-F-dU/dC-RNA | Isolation of aptamers with affinity for many VSGs variants. Binding to live parasites | Lorger et al., |
| 2′-NH2-dU/dC-RNA | Binding to the flagellar attachment zone | Homann et al., | |
| Reporter RNA | RNA-aptamer base methodology for measuring RNA editing activity in the low femtomole range | Liang and Connell, | |
| RNA | Identification of signals for RNA import into the mitochondria | Bhattacharyya et al., | |
| DNA | Binding to the surface protein KMP-11 | Berberich et al., | |
| DNA | Binding to histones (H2A and H3) | Ramos et al., | |
| 2′-F-dU/dc-RNA | Binding to PfEMP1 exposed at the surface of infected-erythrocytes. Rosette disruption by aptamers | Ghosh et al., | |
| DNA | Inhibition of hemozoin formation and parasite growth by heme binding aptamers | Niles et al., | |