Literature DB >> 23315293

Pharmacovigilance in the Middle East: a survey of 13 arabic-speaking countries.

Kerry Wilbur1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of countries to support their own national pharmacovigilance cannot be understated. While adverse drug reaction (ADR) data from other countries is helpful in making medication safety decisions, information may not be relevant or applicable to domestic populations.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to inventory national pharmacovigilance systems in place in the Middle East region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Uppsala Monitoring Centre Assessment of Country Pharmacovigilance Situation questionnaire (February 2008) was adapted and translated into Arabic and administered to the head of the identified centres responsible for medication safety in 13 Arabic-speaking Middle Eastern countries. This survey contains domains pertaining to general programme information; overview of technology and personnel support; suspected ADR reporting and subsequent data use; and pharmacovigilance activity and advocacy.
RESULTS: Data for 11 countries were obtained: representatives from two countries did not participate (Lebanon, Syria). Six described formal national pharmacovigilance programmes (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Oman, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates), while five (Bahrain, Kuwait, Palestine, Qatar and Yemen) reported no active programme or designated centre. The majority are government funded, but staff resources are constrained, ranging from two to ten people. Sixty-seven percent of programmes facilitated submission of spontaneous ADRs to the centre by email, but none directly through a web-based platform. All used the information for drug regulatory purposes and five reported dissemination of safety information to the public.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first survey to inventory the status of pharmacovigilance in the Middle East. While a number of countries participate in suspected ADR reporting activities, an estimated population of 30-50 million is without formal domestic programmes. Current emphasis of drug safety in the region is on detection and prevention of counterfeit products reaching the consumer. Existing mechanisms for regional collaboration should be advanced so experience from model programmes can be shared. Technology must be exploited to enhance ease of spontaneous reporting and subsequent data management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315293     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-012-0001-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  13 in total

1.  Reporting of adverse events.

Authors:  Lucian L Leape
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding the spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  J Hasford; M Goettler; K-H Munter; B Müller-Oerlinghausen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  National differences in publishing papers on adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  R E Ferner; J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The knowledge and attitude of the Turkish community pharmacists toward pharmacovigilance in the Kadikoy district of Istanbul.

Authors:  Hale Zerrin Toklu; Meral Keyer Uysal
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-03-19

5.  Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting in Iran.

Authors:  Ghazal Vessal; Zeinab Mardani; Mehri Mollai
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-12-31

6.  Attitude survey of adverse drug-reaction reporting by health care professionals across the European Union. The European Pharmacovigilance Research Group.

Authors:  K J Belton
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Attitudinal survey of adverse drug reaction reporting by medical practitioners in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  K J Belton; S C Lewis; S Payne; M D Rawlins; S M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Pharmacovigilance activities in 55 low- and middle-income countries: a questionnaire-based analysis.

Authors:  Sten Olsson; Shanthi N Pal; Andy Stergachis; Mary Couper
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review.

Authors:  Mariam Molokhia; Shivani Tanna; Derek Bell
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Pharmacists' attitudes toward adverse drug reaction reporting in Hong Kong.

Authors:  K K Lee; T Y Chan; K Raymond; J A Critchley
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  20 in total

1.  Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Primary Care Settings in Kuwait: A Comparative Study of Physicians and Pharmacists.

Authors:  Jacinthe Lemay; Fatemah M Alsaleh; Lulwa Al-Buresli; Mohammed Al-Mutairi; Eman A Abahussain; Tania Bayoud
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  A Survey on Pharmacovigilance Activities in ASEAN and Selected Non-ASEAN Countries, and the Use of Quantitative Signal Detection Algorithms.

Authors:  Cheng Leng Chan; Pei San Ang; Shu Chuen Li
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Comment on: "Pharmacovigilance in the Middle East".

Authors:  Yaser Mohammed Al-Worafi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Pharmacovigilance in developing countries (part I): importance and challenges.

Authors:  Shaimaa Elshafie; Iman Zaghloul; Anne Marie Roberti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08

5.  Pharmacy practice and clinical pharmacy research in the Middle East: a scoping review of studies from Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

Authors:  Daneh Obaid; Faris El-Dahiyat; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  How to improve suspected ADR reporting among pharmacists in the GCC?

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Knowledge, attitude and practices of pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting among pharmacists working in secondary and tertiary governmental hospitals in Kuwait.

Authors:  Fatemah M Alsaleh; Sherifah W Alzaid; Eman A Abahussain; Tania Bayoud; Jacinthe Lemay
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Pharmacovigilance system in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Thamir M Alshammari; Mohammed Alshakka; Hisham Aljadhey
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Communicating medication risk to cardiovascular patients in Qatar.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Arwa Sahal; Dina Elgaily
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2018-02-12

10.  Adverse drug reaction reporting and development of pharmacovigilance systems in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, and Montenegro: a retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study.

Authors:  Una Glamočlija; Biljana Tubić; Martin Kondža; Aleksandar Zolak; Nataša Grubiša
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.