| Literature DB >> 23314342 |
F S Lizarte Neto1, D P C Tirapelli, S R Ambrosio, C R Tirapelli, F M Oliveira, P C Novais, F M Peria, H F Oliveira, C G Carlotti Junior, L F Tirapelli.
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common and malignant primary brain tumors in humans. Studies have shown that classes of kaurene diterpene have anti-tumor activity related to their ability to induce apoptosis. We investigated the response of the human glioblastoma cell line U87 to treatment with ent-kaur-16-en-19-oic acid (kaurenoic acid, KA). We analyzed cell survival and the induction of apoptosis using flow cytometry and annexin V staining. Additionally, the expression of anti-apoptotic (c-FLIP and miR-21) and apoptotic (Fas, caspase-3 and caspase-8) genes was analyzed by relative quantification (real-time PCR) of mRNA levels in U87 cells that were either untreated or treated with KA (30, 50, or 70 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. U87 cells treated with KA demonstrated reduced viability, and an increase in annexin V- and annexin V/PI-positive cells was observed. The percentage of apoptotic cells was 9% for control cells, 26% for cells submitted to 48 h of treatment with 50 µM KA, and 31% for cells submitted to 48 h of treatment with 70 µM KA. Similarly, in U87 cells treated with KA for 48 h, we observed an increase in the expression of apoptotic genes (caspase-8, -3) and a decrease in the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (miR-21 and c-FLIP). KA possesses several interesting properties and induces apoptosis through a unique mechanism. Further experiments will be necessary to determine if KA may be used as a lead compound for the development of new chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of primary brain tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23314342 PMCID: PMC3854348 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20121423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1Structure of ent-kaur-16-en-19-oic acid (kaurenoic acid, KA).
Figure 2Effect of kaurenoic acid (KA) treatment on cell viability. U87 cells were treated with different concentrations of KA, and the trypan blue dye-exclusion method was used to detect cell viability. The y-axis shows the percentage of cell viability. The concentrations of KA used and the durations of the treatments are indicated. Data are reported as means ± SD of 3 determinations. *P < 0.05 for 50 µM KA: 24 compared to 72 h; +P< 0.05 for 70 µM KA: 24 compared to 48 and 72 h; #P< 0.05 for 70 µM KA: 48 compared to 72 h (Bonferroni multiple comparison test).
Figure 3Kaurenoic acid (KA) induces apoptosis in U87 cells. U87 cells were treated with 30, 50, or 70 µM KA for 48 h. Phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization was determined by the combined annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) assay. Cells that stained positive for annexin V represented cells with intact membranes and externalized PS (percentages are indicated in the lower right panel). Cells that stained positive for annexin V/PI represent cells that had lost membrane integrity (percentages are indicated in the upper right panel). Data are reported as means ± SD of 3 determinations. P < 0.05 for 70 and 50 µM KA treatment vs control (Bonferroni multiple comparison test).
Figure 4Caspase-3 and caspase-8 gene expression in U87 cells. The y-axis indicates the fold-change in caspase-3 and caspase-8 expression. Data are reported as means ± SD for 3 measurements. The expression levels of caspase-3 and caspase-8 were compared between cells that had been treated with different concentrations of kaurenoic acid (KA) for 48 h and untreated cells. #P < 0.0001 for 70 µM KA treatment vs control cells for caspase-3. +P < 0.001 for 70 µM KA treatment vs control cells for caspase-8 (Bonferroni multiple comparison test).
Figure 5c-FLIP gene expression in U87 cells. The y-axis indicates the fold-change in c-FLIP expression. Data are reported as means ± SD for 3 measurements. The expression of c-FLIP was compared between cells that had been treated with different concentrations of kaurenoic acid (KA) for 48 h and untreated cells. *P < 0.05 for 70 µM KA treatment vs control cells (Bonferroni multiple comparison test).
Figure 6miR-21 gene expression in U87 cells. The y-axis indicates the fold-change in miR-21 expression. Data are reported as means ± SD for 3 measurements. The expression of miR-21 was compared between cells that had been treated with 70 µM kaurenoic acid (KA) for 48 h and untreated cells. ≠P < 0.01 for 70 µM KA treatment vs control cells (Bonferroni multiple comparison test).