INTRODUCTION: Psychometric definitions of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) typically use cut-off levels set at 1.5 SDs below age-adjusted and education-adjusted norms, assuming that the education adjustment accounts for premorbid abilities. However, noncognitive factors impact educational attainment, potentially leading to incorrect categorization as MCI. We examined whether using an adjustment based on reading performance [Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) Reading] improved MCI diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: A total of 935 Framingham Offspring (mean age, 72±5 y) underwent tests of memory, executive function, abstraction, language, and visuospatial function as part of a neuropsychological test battery. Domain-specific test scores were regressed onto age and WRAT score, or education, to define MCI. Survival analyses were used to relate baseline MCI to incident dementia. RESULTS: The 2 MCI definitions differed most for the lowest and highest education groups. The WRAT definition was more strongly associated with incident dementia for all 5 tests. MCI level abstraction performance was associated with incident dementia using the WRAT definition (HR=3.20, P=0.033), but not the education definition (HR=1.19, P=0.814). DISCUSSION: The WRAT should be considered along with the standard measure of years of education, as it may be a better surrogate marker of premorbid abilities.
INTRODUCTION: Psychometric definitions of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) typically use cut-off levels set at 1.5 SDs below age-adjusted and education-adjusted norms, assuming that the education adjustment accounts for premorbid abilities. However, noncognitive factors impact educational attainment, potentially leading to incorrect categorization as MCI. We examined whether using an adjustment based on reading performance [Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) Reading] improved MCI diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: A total of 935 Framingham Offspring (mean age, 72±5 y) underwent tests of memory, executive function, abstraction, language, and visuospatial function as part of a neuropsychological test battery. Domain-specific test scores were regressed onto age and WRAT score, or education, to define MCI. Survival analyses were used to relate baseline MCI to incident dementia. RESULTS: The 2 MCI definitions differed most for the lowest and highest education groups. The WRAT definition was more strongly associated with incident dementia for all 5 tests. MCI level abstraction performance was associated with incident dementia using the WRAT definition (HR=3.20, P=0.033), but not the education definition (HR=1.19, P=0.814). DISCUSSION: The WRAT should be considered along with the standard measure of years of education, as it may be a better surrogate marker of premorbid abilities.
Authors: Jennifer J Manly; Diane M Jacobs; Pegah Touradji; Scott A Small; Yaakov Stern Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Oscar L Lopez; William J Jagust; Steven T DeKosky; James T Becker; Annette Fitzpatrick; Corinne Dulberg; John Breitner; Constantine Lyketsos; Beverly Jones; Claudia Kawas; Michelle Carlson; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-10
Authors: Rhoda Au; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Merrill Elias; Penelope Elias; Lisa Sullivan; Alexa Beiser; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2004 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Beth E Snitz; Judith Saxton; Oscar L Lopez; Diane G Ives; Leslie O Dunn; Stephen R Rapp; Michelle C Carlson; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Steven T Dekosky Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Dorene M Rentz; Terri J Huh; Robert R Faust; Andrew E Budson; Leonard F M Scinto; Reisa A Sperling; Kirk R Daffner Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Paul B Jantz; Erin D Bigler; Alyson L Froehlich; Molly B D Prigge; Annahir N Cariello; Brittany G Travers; Jeffrey Anderson; Brandon A Zielinski; Andrew L Alexander; Nicholas Lange; Janet E Lainhart Journal: Psychol Rep Date: 2015-04-14
Authors: Ileana De Anda-Duran; Camilo Fernandez Alonso; David J Libon; Owen T Carmichael; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Shakira F Suglia; Rhoda Au; Lydia A Bazzano Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Ivy N Miller; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa S Beiser; Joanne M Murabito; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.645