PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Wound healing research has progressed impressively over the past years. New insights into the pathogenesis of different chronic wounds and the study of novel treatment have made wound healing a model disorder and have revealed basic cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying chronic wounds. Although the observation is so obvious and simple, the interpretations by different observers can be quite variable. The interpretations of severity and change in severity by treatment may differ considerably between patient and practitioners. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review we provide comprehensive view on different aspects of wound diagnostic, including clinical measurement, new biomarkers in wound pathology, proteases evaluation, and future noninvasive sensor-based devices. SUMMARY: Wound caregivers are in the unique position of being able to observe the wound changes and describe these with knowledge and strict methodology, but also with the wide range of available wound diagnostic devices. The complexity of severity assessment in wound healing is reflected by the multiple clinical scores available. The best objective methods used to evaluate cutaneous tissue repair should have a high specificity and sensitivity and a low inter and intraobserver variation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Wound healing research has progressed impressively over the past years. New insights into the pathogenesis of different chronic wounds and the study of novel treatment have made wound healing a model disorder and have revealed basic cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying chronic wounds. Although the observation is so obvious and simple, the interpretations by different observers can be quite variable. The interpretations of severity and change in severity by treatment may differ considerably between patient and practitioners. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review we provide comprehensive view on different aspects of wound diagnostic, including clinical measurement, new biomarkers in wound pathology, proteases evaluation, and future noninvasive sensor-based devices. SUMMARY: Wound caregivers are in the unique position of being able to observe the wound changes and describe these with knowledge and strict methodology, but also with the wide range of available wound diagnostic devices. The complexity of severity assessment in wound healing is reflected by the multiple clinical scores available. The best objective methods used to evaluate cutaneous tissue repair should have a high specificity and sensitivity and a low inter and intraobserver variation.
Authors: Daniela S Masson-Meyers; Thiago A M Andrade; Guilherme F Caetano; Francielle R Guimaraes; Marcel N Leite; Saulo N Leite; Marco Andrey C Frade Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: J Vincent Edwards; Krystal R Fontenot; Nicolette T Prevost; Nicole Pircher; Falk Liebner; Brian D Condon Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Sridevi Nagaraja; Lin Chen; Luisa A DiPietro; Jaques Reifman; Alexander Y Mitrophanov Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Stephen D Milne; Ihab Seoudi; Hanadi Al Hamad; Talal K Talal; Anzila A Anoop; Niloofar Allahverdi; Zain Zakaria; Robert Menzies; Patricia Connolly Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.315