Literature DB >> 23313604

Emotional processing modulates attentional capture of irrelevant sound input in adolescents.

B Gulotta1, G Sadia, E Sussman.   

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to investigate how emotional processing modulates the allocation of attention to irrelevant background sound events in adolescence. We examined the effect of viewing positively and negatively valenced video clips on components of event-related brain potentials (ERPs), while irrelevant sounds were presented to the ears. All sounds evoked the P1, N1, P2, and N2 components. The infrequent, randomly occurring novel environmental sounds evoked the P3a component in all trial types. The main finding was that the P3a component was larger in amplitude when evoked by salient, distracting background sound events when participants were watching negatively charged video clips, compared to when viewing of the positive or neutral video clips. The results suggest that the threshold for involuntary attention to the novel sounds was lowered during viewing of the negative movie contexts. This indicates a survival mechanism, which would be needed for more automatic processing of irrelevant sounds to monitor the unattended environment in situations perceived as more threatening.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23313604      PMCID: PMC3648586          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  45 in total

1.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.

Authors:  Jennifer A Johnson; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Joseph B Hopfinger; Vicki M West
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Judith Domínguez-Borràs; Manuel Garcia-Garcia; Carles Escera
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b.

Authors:  J Katayama; J Polich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Brain imaging investigation of the impairing effect of emotion on cognition.

Authors:  Gloria Wong; Sanda Dolcos; Ekaterina Denkova; Rajendra Morey; Lihong Wang; Gregory McCarthy; Florin Dolcos
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  The use of the EEG in measuring therapeutic drug action: focus on depression and antidepressants.

Authors:  Hamid Alhaj; Grzegorz Wisniewski; R Hamish McAllister-Williams
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.153

8.  A P300 event related potential technique for assessment of sexually oriented interest.

Authors:  Yoram Vardi; Michal Volos; Elliot Sprecher; Yelena Granovsky; Ilan Gruenwald; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain.

Authors:  Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Elaine R Robertson; Joseph A Mikels; Laura L Carstensen; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-09

10.  Auditory event-related potential indices of increased distractibility in children with major depression.

Authors:  T Lepistö; M Soininen; R Ceponiene; F Almqvist; R Näätänen; E T Aronen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  5 in total

1.  Socio-emotionally significant experience and children's processing of irrelevant auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Alice C Schermerhorn; John E Bates; Aina Puce; Dennis L Molfese
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Visually Perceived Negative Emotion Enhances Mismatch Negativity but Fails to Compensate for Age-Related Impairments.

Authors:  Jiali Chen; Xiaomin Huang; Xianglong Wang; Xuefei Zhang; Sishi Liu; Junqin Ma; Yuanqiu Huang; Anli Tang; Wen Wu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Isabel Fraga; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.