BACKGROUND: Syndrome X in women is thought to be caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction, the exact site of which is unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize the microvascular site of dysfunction in these patients using myocardial contrast echocardiography. METHODS: Women with exertional angina, positive test results on stress imaging, but no coronary artery disease (the study group, n = 18) and age-matched control women also with no coronary artery disease (n = 17) were enrolled. Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed at rest and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia. Mean microbubble velocity (β) and myocardial blood volume (A) were measured, and myocardial blood flow (A · β) was computed. In addition, plasma concentrations of eicosanoids, female sex hormones, and C-reactive protein were measured. RESULTS: Rest β and myocardial blood flow (A · β) were higher in the study compared with the control women (1.61 ± 0.68 vs. 0.74 ± 0.44, P = .0001, and 157 ± 121 vs. 54 ± 54, P = 0.0001, respectively) despite similar heart rates and systolic blood pressures. After the administration of dipyridamole, whereas the changes in A and A · β were not significantly different between the two groups, β reserve (the ratio of stress β to rest β) was markedly lower in the study group (1.48 ± 0.62 vs. 2.78 ± 0.94, P = .0001). Blood hematocrit, eicosanoids, female sex hormones, glucose, and C-reactive protein were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary autoregulation is abnormal in patients with syndrome X (higher resting β and myocardial blood flow and lower β reserve), which suggests that the coronary resistance vessels are the site of microvascular abnormality.
BACKGROUND: Syndrome X in women is thought to be caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction, the exact site of which is unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize the microvascular site of dysfunction in these patients using myocardial contrast echocardiography. METHODS:Women with exertional angina, positive test results on stress imaging, but no coronary artery disease (the study group, n = 18) and age-matched control women also with no coronary artery disease (n = 17) were enrolled. Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed at rest and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia. Mean microbubble velocity (β) and myocardial blood volume (A) were measured, and myocardial blood flow (A · β) was computed. In addition, plasma concentrations of eicosanoids, female sex hormones, and C-reactive protein were measured. RESULTS: Rest β and myocardial blood flow (A · β) were higher in the study compared with the control women (1.61 ± 0.68 vs. 0.74 ± 0.44, P = .0001, and 157 ± 121 vs. 54 ± 54, P = 0.0001, respectively) despite similar heart rates and systolic blood pressures. After the administration of dipyridamole, whereas the changes in A and A · β were not significantly different between the two groups, β reserve (the ratio of stress β to rest β) was markedly lower in the study group (1.48 ± 0.62 vs. 2.78 ± 0.94, P = .0001). Blood hematocrit, eicosanoids, female sex hormones, glucose, and C-reactive protein were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary autoregulation is abnormal in patients with syndrome X (higher resting β and myocardial blood flow and lower β reserve), which suggests that the coronary resistance vessels are the site of microvascular abnormality.
Authors: D Elizabeth Le; Jian-Ping Bin; Matthew P Coggins; Kevin Wei; Jonathan R Lindner; Sanjiv Kaul Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Tien Yin Wong; Ronald Klein; A Richey Sharrett; Bruce B Duncan; David J Couper; James M Tielsch; Barbara E K Klein; Larry D Hubbard Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jonathan R Panting; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; Frank Grothues; David N Firmin; Peter Collins; Dudley J Pennell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sahar Taqui; Maros Ferencik; Brian P Davidson; J Todd Belcik; Federico Moccetti; Michael Layoun; Jacob Raber; Mitchell Turker; Hagai Tavori; Sergio Fazio; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Alexandros Papachristidis; Damian Roper; Daniela Cassar Demarco; Ioannis Tsironis; Michael Papitsas; Jonathan Byrne; Khaled Alfakih; Mark J Monaghan Journal: Echo Res Pract Date: 2016-11-21
Authors: F Groepenhoff; R G M Klaassen; G B Valstar; S H Bots; N C Onland-Moret; H M Den Ruijter; T Leiner; A L M Eikendal Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: D Elizabeth Le; Catherine M Davis; Kevin Wei; Yan Zhao; Zhiping Cao; Matthew Nugent; Kristin L Lyon Scott; Lijuan Liu; Shanthi Nagarajan; Nabil J Alkayed; Sanjiv Kaul Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.733