Literature DB >> 23313212

The impact of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and American Urological Association symptom score on the sensitivity of cancer detection using the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator.

Donna P Ankerst1, Cathee Till, Andreas Boeck, Phyllis Goodman, Catherine M Tangen, Ziding Feng, Alan W Partin, Daniel W Chan, Lori Sokoll, Jacob Kagan, John T Wei, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the independent predictive value of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and AUASS (American Urological Association symptom score) compared to risk factors included in the PCPTRC (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for prostate cancer) and PCPTHG (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for high grade cancer [Gleason grade 7 or greater]).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 5,519 PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) participants used to construct the PCPTRC 4,958 with AUASS and prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less were included on logistic regression analysis. Risk algorithms were evaluated in 571 EDRN (Early Detection Research Network) participants using the ROC AUC.
RESULTS: A total of 1,094 participants (22.1%) had prostate cancer, of whom 232 (21.2%) had high grade disease. For prostate cancer prediction higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, family history of prostate cancer and number of cores were associated with increased risk, while volume was associated with decreased risk. Excluding prostate volume and number of cores, a history of negative biopsy and increased AUASS were also associated with lower risk. For high grade cancer higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, black race and number of cores were associated with increased risk and volume, while AUASS was associated with decreased risk. The AUC of the PCPTRC adjusted for volume and number of cores was 72.7% (using EDRN data), 68.2% when adjusted for AUASS alone and 67.6% PCPTRC. For high grade disease the AUCs were 74.8%, 74.0% and 73.5% (PCPTHG), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted PCPT risk calculators for volume, number of cores and AUASS improve cancer detection.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23313212      PMCID: PMC3708069          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Selective detection of histologically aggressive prostate cancer: an Early Detection Research Network Prediction model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies with validation in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Simpa Salami; Meredith M Regan; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; J Stephen Jones; Michael W Kattan; Eric Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Donna Ankerst; George Bartsch; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Steve J Freedland; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Evidence for a biopsy derived grade artifact among larger prostate glands.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Rami Al-Azab; Gina Lockwood; Ants Toi; Andrew Evans; John Trachtenberg; Michael A S Jewett; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Betsy A Higgins; Javier Hernandez; Edith Canby-Hagino; Timothy Brand; Dean A Troyer; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Validation in a multiple urology practice cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for predicting prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Stephen J Eyre; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Prakash V Nair; Meredith M Regan; Gerrardina Bueti; Jeffrey Tang; Mark A Rubin; Michael Kearney; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Andreas Boeck; Stephen J Freedland; Ian M Thompson; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; J Stephen Jones; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; F H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; J Stephen Jones; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Donna Ankerst; George Bartsch; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Stephen J Freedland; Daniel M Moreira; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  16 in total

1.  Quantitative imaging of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian J Konopka; Marcin Woźniak; Jamila Hedhli; Anna Siekierzycka; Jarosław Skokowski; Rafał Pęksa; Marcin Matuszewski; Gnanasekar Munirathinam; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Iwona T Dobrucki; Leszek Kalinowski; Lawrence W Dobrucki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The Next Generation of Clinical Decision Making Tools: Development of a Real-Time Prediction Tool for Outcome of Prostate Biopsy in Response to a Continuously Evolving Prostate Cancer Landscape.

Authors:  Andreas N Strobl; Ian M Thompson; Andrew J Vickers; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prostate volume index and prostatic chronic inflammation predicted low tumor load in 945 patients at baseline prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Giovanni Novella; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Arianna Mariotto; Matteo Brunelli; Maria Angela Cerruto; Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani; Filippo Migliorini; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Incorporation of Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG into Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Martin Goros; Scott A Tomlins; Dattatraya Patil; Ziding Feng; John T Wei; Martin G Sanda; Jonathan Gelfond; Ian M Thompson; Robin J Leach; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2018-02-13

5.  Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Josef Hoefler; Sebastian Bock; Phyllis J Goodman; Andrew Vickers; Javier Hernandez; Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; John T Wei; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Predicting risk of prostate cancer in men receiving finasteride: effect of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and American Urological Association symptom score.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Cathee Till; Andreas Boeck; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  M Maruf; M Fascelli; A K George; M M Siddiqui; M Kongnyuy; J M DiBianco; A Muthigi; S Valayil; A Sidana; T P Frye; A Kilchevsky; P L Choyke; B Turkbey; B J Wood; P A Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Improving patient prostate cancer risk assessment: Moving from static, globally-applied to dynamic, practice-specific risk calculators.

Authors:  Andreas N Strobl; Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster; Ewout Steyerberg; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume.

Authors:  Peter K F Chiu; Monique J Roobol; Jeremy Y Teoh; Wai-Man Lee; Siu-Ying Yip; See-Ming Hou; Chris H Bangma; Chi-Fai Ng
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Johanna Straubinger; Katharina Selig; Lourdes Guerrios; Amanda De Hoedt; Javier Hernandez; Michael A Liss; Robin J Leach; Stephen J Freedland; Michael W Kattan; Robert Nam; Alexander Haese; Francesco Montorsi; Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew R Cooperberg; Cedric Poyet; Emily Vertosick; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.