Literature DB >> 23312937

Effect of hospital-level variation in the use of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy on perioperative stroke and death in asymptomatic patients.

Theodore H Yuo1, Howard S Degenholtz, Rabih A Chaer, Kevin L Kraemer, Michel S Makaroun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative stroke and death (PSD) are more common after carotid artery stenting (CAS) than after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients, but whether this is also true in asymptomatic patients is unclear. Furthermore, use of both CEA and CAS varies geographically, suggesting possible variation in outcomes. We compared odds of PSD after CAS and CEA in asymptomatic patients to determine the impact of this variation.
METHODS: We identified CAS and CEA procedures and hospitals where they were performed from 2005 to 2009 California hospital discharge data. Preoperative symptom status and medical comorbidities were determined using administrative codes. We compared PSD rates after CAS and CEA using logistic regression and propensity score matching. We quantified hospital-level variation in the relative utilization of CAS by calculating hospital-specific probabilities of CAS use among propensity score-matched patients. We then calculated a weighted average for each hospital and used this as a predictor of PSD.
RESULTS: We identified 6053 CAS and 36,524 CEA procedures that were used to treat asymptomatic patients in 278 hospitals. Perioperative stroke and death occurred in 250 CAS and 660 CEA patients, yielding unadjusted PSD rates of 4.1% and 1.8%, respectively (P < .001). Compared with CAS patients, CEA patients were more likely to be older than 70 years (66% vs 62%; P < .001) but less likely to have three or more Elixhauser comorbidities (37% vs 39%; P < .001). Multivariate models demonstrated that CAS was associated with increased odds of PSD (odds ratio [OR], 1.865; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.373-2.534; P < .001). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores also demonstrated 1.9% increased probability of PSD with CAS (P < .001). The average probability of receiving CAS across all hospitals and strata was 13.8%, but the interquartile range was 0.9% to 21.5%, suggesting significant hospital-level variation. In univariate analysis, patients treated at hospitals with higher CAS utilization had higher odds of PSD compared with patients in hospitals that performed CAS less (OR, 2.141; 95% CI, 1.328-3.454; P = .002). Multivariate analysis did not demonstrate this effect but again demonstrated higher odds of PSD after CAS (OR, 1.963; 95% CI, 1.393-2.765; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy has lower odds of PSD compared with CAS in asymptomatic patients. Increased utilization of CAS at the hospital level is associated with increased odds of PSD among asymptomatic patients, but this effect appears to be related to generally worse outcomes after CAS compared with CEA.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23312937      PMCID: PMC3692978          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  26 in total

1.  30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  P A Ringleb; J Allenberg; H Brückmann; H-H Eckstein; G Fraedrich; M Hartmann; M Hennerici; O Jansen; G Klein; A Kunze; P Marx; K Niederkorn; W Schmiedt; L Solymosi; R Stingele; H Zeumer; W Hacke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Carotid endarterectomy--an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  S Chaturvedi; A Bruno; T Feasby; R Holloway; O Benavente; S N Cohen; R Cote; D Hess; J Saver; J D Spence; B Stern; J Wilterdink
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.

Authors:  Elena Birman-Deych; Amy D Waterman; Yan Yan; David S Nilasena; Martha J Radford; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CARESS): phase I clinical trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Pavlos Tsantilas; Andreas Kühnl; Bernhard Haller; Thorben Breitkreuz; Alexander Zimmermann; Michael Kallmayer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Role of Carotid Artery Stenting in Prevention of Stroke for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Bayesian Cross-Design and Network Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Jae Hyung Roh; Hyun Jun Cho; Jae Hwan Lee; Yongku Kim; Yeongwoo Park; Jae Hyeong Park; Hee Soon Park; Minsu Kim; Hyang Gon Jin; Yeji Cheon; In Whan Seong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.