Literature DB >> 23312043

Multiple structures for virtual ligand screening: defining binding site properties-based criteria to optimize the selection of the query.

Nesrine Ben Nasr1, Hélène Guillemain, Nathalie Lagarde, Jean-François Zagury, Matthieu Montes.   

Abstract

Structure based virtual ligand screening (SBVLS) methods are widely used in drug discovery programs. When several structures of the target are available, protocols based either on single structure docking or on ensemble docking can be used. The performance of the methods depends on the structure(s) used as a reference, whose choice requires retrospective enrichment studies on benchmarking databases which consume additional resources. In the present study, we have identified several trends in the properties of the binding sites of the structures that led to the optimal performance in retrospective SBVLS tests whatever the docking program used (Surflex-dock or ICM). By assessing their hydrophobicity and comparing their volume and opening, we show that the selection of optimal structures should be possible with no requirement of prior retrospective enrichment studies. If the mean binding site volume is lower than 350 A(3), the structure with the smaller volume should be preferred. In the other cases, the structure with the largest binding site should be preferred. These optimal structures may be either selected for a single structure docking strategy or an ensemble docking strategy. When constructing an ensemble, the opening of the site might be an interesting criterion additionaly to its volume as the most closed structures should not be preferred in the large systems. These "binding site properties-based" guidelines could be helpful to optimize future prospective drug discovery protocols when several structures of the target are available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23312043     DOI: 10.1021/ci3004557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  13 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of EGFR structures' performance in virtual screening.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xiang Li; Zigang Dong
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Authors:  Bing Xie; John D Clark; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Joel Ricci-Lopez; Sergio A Aguila; Michael K Gilson; Carlos A Brizuela
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Modelling three-dimensional protein structures for applications in drug design.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Andreas Bergner; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.851

5.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: principles, applications and recent advances.

Authors:  Evanthia Lionta; George Spyrou; Demetrios K Vassilatis; Zoe Cournia
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Lane Votapka; Jesper Sørensen; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Online structure-based screening of purchasable approved drugs and natural compounds: retrospective examples of drug repositioning on cancer targets.

Authors:  Nathalie Lagarde; Julien Rey; Aram Gyulkhandanyan; Pierre Tufféry; Maria A Miteva; Bruno O Villoutreix
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-17

9.  Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles.

Authors:  Robert V Swift; Siti A Jusoh; Tavina L Offutt; Eric S Li; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  Decoys Selection in Benchmarking Datasets: Overview and Perspectives.

Authors:  Manon Réau; Florent Langenfeld; Jean-François Zagury; Nathalie Lagarde; Matthieu Montes
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.