| Literature DB >> 23311985 |
Shujuan Li1, Junlin Yang, Yunquan Li, Ling Zhu, Yuese Lin, Xuandi Li, Zifang Huang, Huishen Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although it is speculated that scoliosis may induce cardiac dysfunction, there is no report about evaluation of cardiac function, especially right cardiac function in patients with scoliosis. Therefore, we evaluated right ventricular function in idiopathic scoliotic patients with mild to severe curves and compared them with healthy children and adolescents matched in age, then explored relationship between scoliosis and right ventricular function.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23311985 PMCID: PMC3558379 DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scoliosis ISSN: 1748-7161
Figure 1TAD measured from the RV lateral wall (TADl). The upper image was the apical 4-chamber view, the lower curve was the M-mode line of RV lateral wall. TADl was the distance measured form the highest to the lowest of the line (in the above image).
Figure 2TAD measured from the interventricular septum (TADs). The upper image was the apical 4-chamber view, the lower curve was the M-mode line of the interventricular septum. TADs was the distance measured from the highest to the lowest of the line (in the above image).
Figure 3TADl in scoliotic patients and controls.
Figure 4TADs in scoliotic patients and controls.
Figure 5Correlation of TADl with Cobb’s angle.
Figure 6Correlation of TADs with Cobb’s angle.
Patients’ general information
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | ||||
| | | ||||
| Gender (M/F) | 2/7 | 5/10 | 4/9 | 7/10 | 0.8 |
| Age, yrs | 16.09(4.01) | 15.49(3.76) | 16.33(3.65) | 14.49(5.01) | 0.65 |
| Weight, kg | 41.13(7.63)c | 42.26(5.61)c | 33.6(6.02)abd | 46.4(12.16)c | <0.01 |
| Cobb’s angle | 37.67(6.52)bc | 62.87(11.98)ac | 122(22.29)ab | | <0.01 |
| FVC(L) | 77.22(9.13)c | 74.73(13.11)c | 63.15(14.22)ab | | 0.02 |
| FEV1(L) | 72.78(8.39) c | 74.20(12.11) c | 58.38(11.36) ab | | <0.01 |
| RV(mm) | 20.27(3.14) | 20.33(1.95) | 20.27(3.44) | 21.26(2.42) | 0.69 |
| RVOT(mm) | 22.72(2.9) | 21.87(3.68) | 20.92(3.3) | 23.29(2.94) | 0.24 |
| PA(mm) | 19.78(4.27) | 19.73(3.53) | 20.23(2.17) | 20.69(1.76) | 0.75 |
| RVEF(%) | 61.11(5.16) | 60.53(4.93) | 61.38(6.34) | 59.59(5.3) | 0.82 |
Values as mean (SD); a, b, c, d represented P < 0.05 when comparing with group 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively.