| Literature DB >> 23311725 |
Savas Sipahi1, Ozkan Gungor, Mehmet Gunduz, Mehmet Cilci, Mustafa Cahit Demirci, Ali Tamer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is an important reason for end-stage renal failure and diabetic foot wounds worsen the life qualities of these patients. Protein and amino acid support accelerates the wound healing. The purpose of this retrospective study is to examine the effect of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, arginine and glutamine (Abound) supplementation on the wound healing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23311725 PMCID: PMC3598478 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
“Bates-Jensen” wound assessment tool
| Necrotic | 1 | Necrotic | 1 |
| Deep | 2 | Scabbed | 2 |
| Moderate | 3 | Granulated | 3 |
| Easy | 4 | Epithelial | 4 |
| Minimal | 5 | Closed | 5 |
Patient demographics and basic clinical and laboratory findings
| Age (years) | 66 (10) | 51-81 | |
| Gender (male,%) | 81 | | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128(12) | 130.0(9.0) | 0.60 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86 (10) | 88.0(10.0) | 0.62 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.6(0.9) | 6.5(1.4) | 0.85 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 8.9(5.8) | 9.7(7.8) | 0.81 |
| Albumin (gr/dl) | 4.0(0.3) | 4.1(0.0) | 0.89 |
| Hemoglobin (gr/dl) | 11.7(2.0) | 11.5(2.0) | 0.79 |
| WBC (103/μL) | 6.9(1.7) | 6.2(1.3) | 0.3 |
| Urea (mg/dl) | 159.0(49.0) | 146.0(47.0) | 0.56 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 6.6(1.7) | 6.5(2.1) | 0.89 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 159.0(37.0) | 166.0(53.0) | 0.75 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 192.0(162.0) | 249.0(214.0) | 0.54 |
| ALT (U/L) | 12.4(2.0) | 14.9(2.6) | |
| Na (mmol/L) | 142.0(2.0) | 139.0(2.0) | |
| K (mmol/L) | 5.5(0.3) | 5.2(0.8) | 0.33 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; CRP: C-reactive protein (CRP); ALT: alanine aminotransferase; Na: sodium; K: potassium.
Pre-treatment and post-treatment wound appearance and depth scorings of patients
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Patient 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Patient 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Patient 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Patient 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Patient 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Patient 7 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Patient 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Patient 9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Patient 10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Patient 11 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Figure 1Pre-treatment and post-treatment wound appearances of the selected patients.
The effect of treatment on wound appearance and depth score
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wound appearance score | 2.0(1.0) | 4.0(2.0) | |
| Wound depth score | 3.0(2.0) | 5.0(2.0) | |
IQR: inter-quartile range.