BACKGROUND: To use cardiovascular magnetic resonance to investigate left ventricular wall thickness and the presence of asymmetrical hypertrophy in young army recruits before and after a period of intense exercise training. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, the left ventricular wall thickness was measured in all 17 segments and a normal range was calculated for each. The prevalence of asymmetrical wall thickening was assessed before and after training and defined by a ventricular wall thickness ≥13.0 mm that was >1.5× the thickness of the opposing myocardial segment. Five hundred forty-one men (mean age, 20±2 years) were recruited, 309 underwent repeat scanning. Considerable variation in wall thickness was observed across the ventricle with progressive thickening on moving from the apex to base (P<0.001) and in the basal and midcavity septum compared with the lateral wall (11.0±1.4 versus 10.1±1.3 mm; P<0.001). Twenty-three percent had a maximal wall thickness ≥13.0 mm, whereas the prevalence of asymmetrical wall thickening increased from 2.2% to 10% after the exercise-training program. In those who developed asymmetry, the wall thickness/diastolic volume ration remained normal (0.09±0.02 mm⋅m(2)⋅mL(-1)), indicative of a remodeling response to exercise. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of healthy young white men, we have demonstrated that wall thickness frequently measures ≥13.0 mm and that asymmetrical wall thickening is common and can develop as part of the physiological response to exercise. A diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletic men should, therefore, not be made purely on the basis of regional wall thickening.
BACKGROUND: To use cardiovascular magnetic resonance to investigate left ventricular wall thickness and the presence of asymmetrical hypertrophy in young army recruits before and after a period of intense exercise training. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, the left ventricular wall thickness was measured in all 17 segments and a normal range was calculated for each. The prevalence of asymmetrical wall thickening was assessed before and after training and defined by a ventricular wall thickness ≥13.0 mm that was >1.5× the thickness of the opposing myocardial segment. Five hundred forty-one men (mean age, 20±2 years) were recruited, 309 underwent repeat scanning. Considerable variation in wall thickness was observed across the ventricle with progressive thickening on moving from the apex to base (P<0.001) and in the basal and midcavity septum compared with the lateral wall (11.0±1.4 versus 10.1±1.3 mm; P<0.001). Twenty-three percent had a maximal wall thickness ≥13.0 mm, whereas the prevalence of asymmetrical wall thickening increased from 2.2% to 10% after the exercise-training program. In those who developed asymmetry, the wall thickness/diastolic volume ration remained normal (0.09±0.02 mm⋅m(2)⋅mL(-1)), indicative of a remodeling response to exercise. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of healthy young white men, we have demonstrated that wall thickness frequently measures ≥13.0 mm and that asymmetrical wall thickening is common and can develop as part of the physiological response to exercise. A diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletic men should, therefore, not be made purely on the basis of regional wall thickening.
Authors: Fatih Yalçin; Nagehan Kucukler; Oscar Cingolani; Blaid Mbiyangandu; Lars Sorensen; Aurelio Pinherio; M Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2018-01-04
Authors: Csilla Czimbalmos; Ibolya Csecs; Attila Toth; Orsolya Kiss; Ferenc Imre Suhai; Nora Sydo; Zsofia Dohy; Astrid Apor; Bela Merkely; Hajnalka Vago Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David A Holdsworth; Iain T Parsons; Rebecca Chamley; Joseph Britton; Christopher Pavitt; A John Baksi; Stefan Neubauer; Joanna d'Arcy; Edward D Nicol Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Fatih Yalçin; Hulya Yalçin; Nagehan Küçükler; Serbay Arslan; Oguz Akkuş; Alparslan Kurtul; Maria Roselle Abraham Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Stephen Rohan; Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar; Iwan Harries; Christopher B Lawton; Laura E Ratcliffe; Amy E Burchell; Emma C Hart; Mark C K Hamilton; Julian F R Paton; Angus K Nightingale; Nathan E Manghat Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yeon Sik Choi; Rose T Yin; Anna Pfenniger; Jahyun Koo; Raudel Avila; K Benjamin Lee; Sheena W Chen; Geumbee Lee; Gang Li; Yun Qiao; Alejandro Murillo-Berlioz; Alexi Kiss; Shuling Han; Seung Min Lee; Chenhang Li; Zhaoqian Xie; Yu-Yu Chen; Amy Burrell; Beth Geist; Hyoyoung Jeong; Joohee Kim; Hong-Joon Yoon; Anthony Banks; Seung-Kyun Kang; Zheng Jenny Zhang; Chad R Haney; Alan Varteres Sahakian; David Johnson; Tatiana Efimova; Yonggang Huang; Gregory D Trachiotis; Bradley P Knight; Rishi K Arora; Igor R Efimov; John A Rogers Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 68.164