Literature DB >> 23306956

Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers.

R Parameswaran1, D R Titcomb, N S Blencowe, R G Berrisford, S A Wajed, C G Streets, A D Hollowood, R Krysztopik, C P Barham, J M Blazeby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) may lead to early restoration of health-related quality of life, but few prospective comparative studies have been performed. This exploratory study compared recovery between totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), laparoscopically assisted esophagectomy (LAE) and open surgery (OE).
METHODS: A prospective study in 2 specialist centers recruited consecutive patients undergoing OE, LAE, or MIE for high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Patients completed validated questionnaires, the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), modified Katz Scale, and modified Lawton and Brody Scale (assessing activities of daily living) before and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (26 women; median age 64 years) were scheduled for surgery that was abandoned in 11 due to occult low-volume metastatic disease. In the remaining 86 (OE = 19, LAE = 31, and MIE = 36), there were 4 in-hospital deaths (4 %), and 54 postoperative complications (OE = 12, LAE = 19, and MIE = 23). Overall questionnaire compliance was high (77 %) and baseline scores similar in all groups, although clinical differences between groups were observed with earlier tumors and more squamous cell cancers selected for MIE. Following surgery fatigue levels increased dramatically and activity levels reduced in all groups. These gradually recovered to baseline following MIE and LAE within 6 months, but the ability to perform activities of daily living and most parameters of fatigue had not returned to baseline levels in the OE group.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory prospective nonrandomized study of recovery after different types of surgery for esophageal cancer showed possible small benefits to MIE. A much larger study is needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23306956     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2848-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  19 in total

1.  A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Daniel G Winger; Michael K Gibson; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  The contemporary role of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mohan K Mallipeddi; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes.

Authors:  Danica N Giugliano; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Inderpal S Sarkaria; Nabil P Rizk; Debra A Goldman; Camelia Sima; Kay See Tan; Manjit S Bains; Prasad S Adusumilli; Daniela Molena; Matthew Bott; Thomas Atkinson; David R Jones; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Profiling patient-reported symptom recovery from oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world longitudinal study.

Authors:  Xi Luo; Qin Xie; Qiuling Shi; Yan Miao; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Hong Yin; Xuefeng Leng; Yongtao Han; Hong Zhou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Adam J Bograd; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.815

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chao-Yu Liu; Chen-Sung Lin; Chih-Shiun Shih; Yuh-An Huang; Chia-Chuan Liu; Chih-Tao Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Elena Pallari; Sumit Midya; Muntzer Mughal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Li Zhang; Hua Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Wuke Chen; Jianjun He; Ke Wang; Peijun Liu; Yu Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Prognostic Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Chemoradiation in Clinical Stage II and III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Population Based Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hui-Shan Chen; Shiao-Chi Wu; Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Chia-Chuan Liu; Yu-Chung Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.