BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound criteria for recanalization during real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring of intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in acute ischemic stroke patients in an international, multicenter study. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with proximal intracranial occlusions underwent intra-arterial reperfusion procedures with simultaneous real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring at 3 tertiary-care stroke centers. Residual flow signals at the site of angiographically confirmed occlusions were monitored at a constant transtemporal insonation angle using a standard head-frame. Recanalization was assessed simultaneously by digital subtraction angiography and ultrasound using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) criteria, respectively. Independent readers blinded to digital subtraction angiography performed validation of TIBI flow grades. The interrater reliability for assessment of TIBI grades was investigated. RESULTS: We evaluated time-linked real-time digital subtraction angiography transcranial Doppler images from 96 diagnostic digital subtraction angiography runs during intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in 62 acute ischemic stroke patients (mean age, 59 ± 17 years; 58% men; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 18 [interquartile range 12-21]; median time from symptom onset to intra-arterial procedure initiation, 240 minutes [interquartile range 163-308]). The interrater reliability for evaluation of TIBI grades and assessment of recanalization was good (Cohen κ: 0.838 and 0.874, respectively; P<0.001). Compared with angiography, transcranial Doppler had the following accuracy parameters for detection of complete recanalization (TIBI 4 and 5 versus thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3, flow grades): sensitivity, 88% (95% confidence interval, 72%-96%); specificity, 89% (79%-95%); positive predictive value, 81% (65%-91%); negative predictive value, 93% (84%-98%); and overall accuracy 89% (80%-94%). CONCLUSIONS: At laboratories with high-interrater reliability, TIBI criteria can accurately predict brain recanalization in real time as compared with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction angiographic scores.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound criteria for recanalization during real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring of intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in acute ischemic strokepatients in an international, multicenter study. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic strokepatients with proximal intracranial occlusions underwent intra-arterial reperfusion procedures with simultaneous real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring at 3 tertiary-care stroke centers. Residual flow signals at the site of angiographically confirmed occlusions were monitored at a constant transtemporal insonation angle using a standard head-frame. Recanalization was assessed simultaneously by digital subtraction angiography and ultrasound using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) criteria, respectively. Independent readers blinded to digital subtraction angiography performed validation of TIBI flow grades. The interrater reliability for assessment of TIBI grades was investigated. RESULTS: We evaluated time-linked real-time digital subtraction angiography transcranial Doppler images from 96 diagnostic digital subtraction angiography runs during intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in 62 acute ischemic strokepatients (mean age, 59 ± 17 years; 58% men; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 18 [interquartile range 12-21]; median time from symptom onset to intra-arterial procedure initiation, 240 minutes [interquartile range 163-308]). The interrater reliability for evaluation of TIBI grades and assessment of recanalization was good (Cohen κ: 0.838 and 0.874, respectively; P<0.001). Compared with angiography, transcranial Doppler had the following accuracy parameters for detection of complete recanalization (TIBI 4 and 5 versus thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3, flow grades): sensitivity, 88% (95% confidence interval, 72%-96%); specificity, 89% (79%-95%); positive predictive value, 81% (65%-91%); negative predictive value, 93% (84%-98%); and overall accuracy 89% (80%-94%). CONCLUSIONS: At laboratories with high-interrater reliability, TIBI criteria can accurately predict brain recanalization in real time as compared with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction angiographic scores.
Authors: Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Ramin Zand; Vijay K Sharma; Martin Köhrmann; Sotirios Giannopoulos; Efthymios Dardiotis; Anne W Alexandrov; Panayiotis D Mitsias; Peter D Schellinger; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Georgios Tsivgoulis; Ramin Zand; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Vijay K Sharma; Nitin Goyal; Christos Krogias; Apostolos Safouris; Konstantinos Vadikolias; Konstantinos Voumvourakis; Anne W Alexandrov; Marc D Malkoff; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kristian Barlinn; Stanislava Kolieskova; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Jessica Kepplinger; Amelia K Boehme; Timo Siepmann; Volker Puetz; Ulf Bodechtel; William D Jordan; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Nitin Goyal; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Ramin Zand; Vijay K Sharma; Kristian Barlinn; Shailesh Male; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Ulf Bodechtel; Sulaiman Iftikhar; Adam Arthur; Lucas Elijovich; Anne W Alexandrov; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Laura Heitsch; Laura Ibanez; Caty Carrera; Michael M Binkley; Daniel Strbian; Turgut Tatlisumak; Alejandro Bustamante; Marc Ribó; Carlos Molina; Antoni Dávalos; Elena López-Cancio; Lucia Muñoz-Narbona; Carol Soriano-Tárraga; Eva Giralt-Steinhauer; Victor Obach; Agnieszka Slowik; Joanna Pera; Katarzyna Lapicka-Bodzioch; Justyna Derbisz; Tomás Sobrino; José Castillo; Francisco Campos; Emilio Rodríguez-Castro; Susana Arias-Rivas; Tomas Segura; Gemma Serrano-Heras; Cristófol Vives-Bauza; Rosa Díaz-Navarro; Silva Tur; Carmen Jimenez; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; Raquel Delgado-Mederos; Juan Arenillas; Jerzy Krupinski; Natalia Cullell; Nuria P Torres-Aguila; Elena Muiño; Jara Cárcel-Márquez; Francisco Moniche; Juan A Cabezas; Andria L Ford; Rajat Dhar; Jaume Roquer; Pooja Khatri; Jordi Jiménez-Conde; Israel Fernandez-Cadenas; Joan Montaner; Jonathan Rosand; Carlos Cruchaga; Jin-Moo Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Georgios Tsivgoulis; Maher Saqqur; Vijay K Sharma; Alejandro Brunser; Jürgen Eggers; Robert Mikulik; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Theodore N Sergentanis; Konstantinos Vadikolias; Fabienne Perren; Marta Rubiera; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; Huy Thang Nguyen; Patricia Martínez-Sánchez; Apostolos Safouris; Ioannis Heliopoulos; Ashfaq Shuaib; Carol Derksen; Konstantinos Voumvourakis; Theodora Psaltopoulou; Anne W Alexandrov; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: J Stroke Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 6.967
Authors: Marcel J Aries; Jan Willem Elting; Roy Stewart; Jacques De Keyser; Berry Kremer; Patrick Vroomen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.692