Literature DB >> 23306087

10-year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.

Brian R Lane1, Steven C Campbell, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Open partial nephrectomy has proven long-term oncologic efficacy. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy outcomes at 5 to 7 years of followup appear comparable to those of the open approach. We present the 10-year outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for a single clinical stage cT1 7 cm or less renal cortical tumor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1,541 patients treated with partial nephrectomy for a single cT1 tumor between 1999 and 2007 with a minimum 5-year followup, an actual followup of 10 years or greater was available in 45 and 254 after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy, respectively.
RESULTS: Median followup after laparoscopic and open surgery was 6.6 and 7.8 years, respectively. At 10 years the overall survival rate was 77.2%. The metastasis-free survival rate was 95.2% and 90.0% after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma, respectively (p <0.0001). Baseline differences between patients treated with laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy accounted for most observed differences between the cohorts. The median glomerular filtration rate decrease was 16.9% after the laparoscopic approach and 14.1% after the open approach (p = 0.5). On multivariable analysis predictors of all cause mortality included advancing age (HR 1.52/10 years, p <0.0001), comorbidity (HR 1.33/1 U, p <0.0001), absolute indication (HR 2.25, p = 0.003) and predicted recurrence-free survival (HR 1.58/10% increased risk, p = 0.004) but not laparoscopic vs open operative approach (p = 0.13). Similarly, predictors of metastasis included absolute indication (HR 4.35, p <0.0001) and predicted recurrence-free survival (HR 2.67, p <0.0001) but not operative approach (p = 0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy are excellent in carefully selected patients with limited risk of recurrence for cT1 renal cortical tumors. Overall survival at 10 years is mediated by patient factors such as age, comorbidity and operative indication, and by cancer factors such as predicted recurrence-free survival but not by the choice of operative technique, which depends on surgeon preference and experience.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23306087     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  33 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dream or reality?

Authors:  Blaire Anderson; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Modified laparoscopic simple enucleation with single-layer suture technique versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qun Lu; Xiaozhi Zhao; Changwei Ji; Suhan Guo; Guangxiang Liu; Shiwei Zhang; Xiaogong Li; Weidong Gan; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum Consensus.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Recurrence in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Data.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Speed; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Toni K Choueiri; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hidekazu Tachibana; Shoichi Iida; Tsunenori Kondo; Hironori Fukuda; Toshio Takagi; Junpei Iizuka; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Comparative effectiveness of adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy and non-adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Observational study of survival outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Leon G Walsh; Ciaran E Redmond; Niall P Kelly; Barry B McGuire; Vidit Sharma; Michael E Kelly; David J Galvin; David W Mulvin; Gerald M Lennon; David M Quinlan; Hugh D Flood; Subhasis K Giri
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Do we know (or just believe) that partial nephrectomy leads to better survival than radical nephrectomy for renal cancer?

Authors:  Conrad M Tobert; Christopher B Riedinger; Brian R Lane
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Early single Canadian institution experience.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Richard Haddad; Evan Kovac; Patrick Richard; Maurice Anidjar; Franck Bladou
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Oncological outcomes of patients with incidental pathological T3a stage small renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Sangjun Yoo; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.