Literature DB >> 26377491

Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Hidekazu Tachibana1, Shoichi Iida2, Tsunenori Kondo1, Hironori Fukuda1, Toshio Takagi1, Junpei Iizuka1, Yasunobu Hashimoto1, Kazunari Tanabe1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Postoperative management of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) without drain placement is common, but the effects on patients are unclear. We investigated the impact of no drain placement after MIPN.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 194 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy at one academic center. The study group included 46 evaluable patients without drain placement. The quantity of postoperative fluid collection in the perirenal space was calculated using computed tomography. The preoperative and postoperative serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes numbers, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the blood were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Drains were placed in 148 (76.3 %) patients who underwent MIPN. The remaining 46 (23.7 %) patients did not have drain placement. Although the average total quantity of fluid discharged from the drain was 214 mL, the average fluid remaining in the perirenal space did not significantly differ with or without drain placement (20.3 vs. 16.8 mL, p = 0.64). The decrease in serum total protein and albumin was significantly greater with drain placement than without (total protein: 18.9 vs. 12.2 %, p < 0.001; and albumin: 24.7 vs. 22 %, p = 0.038). No drain placement also caused markedly greater decreases in lymphocytes and monocytes than did drain placement, whereas neutrophils and CRP did not differ based on drain placement.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of the quantity of fluid collection showed little need for routine drain placement. Not placing a drain after MIPN prevented serum protein loss and possibly accelerated wound-healing immune responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous drainage; Drain placement; Minimally invasive surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Renal neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377491     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1094-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  20 in total

1.  I. Robb on Drainage in Pelvic Abdominal Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1890-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Occlusive dressing of wounds: old tradition, new concepts.

Authors:  Ramin Mostofi Zadeh Farahani; Atabak Shahidi
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 2.932

3.  Abdominal drains: their role as a source of infection following splenectomy.

Authors:  E J Cerise; W A Pierce; D L Diamond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Optimal use of an occlusive dressing to enhance healing. Effect of delayed application and early removal on wound healing.

Authors:  W H Eaglstein; S C Davis; A L Mehle; P M Mertz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1988-03

Review 5.  Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings. A clinical review.

Authors:  G A Kannon; A B Garrett
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  Charles Bingham Penrose and the Penrose drain.

Authors:  D J Abramson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-08

7.  Routine drain placement after partial nephrectomy is not always necessary.

Authors:  Guilherme Godoy; Darren J Katz; Ari Adamy; Joseph E Jamal; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Enhanced computed tomography after partial nephrectomy in early postoperative period to detect asymptomatic renal artery pseudoaneurysm.

Authors:  Toshio Takagi; Tsunenori Kondo; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Steven C Campbell; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Risk factors and management of urine leaks after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Joshua J Meeks; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Kent T Perry; Robert B Nadler; Norm D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  The need of drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Diez; M R Pujato; A R Ferreres
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  1990
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.