Marci Lee Nilsen1, Susan Sereika, Mary Beth Happ. 1. University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, 336 Victoria Building, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. Mlf981@pitt.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Communication interactions between nurses and mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are typically brief. Factors associated with length of nurses' communication have not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between nurse and patient characteristics and duration of nurse talk. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we calculated duration of nurse talk in the first 3-min of video-recorded communication observation sessions for each nurse-patient dyad (n = 89) in the SPEACS study (4 observation sessions/dyad, n = 356). In addition, we explored the association between nurses' characteristics (age, gender, credentials, nursing experience, and critical care experience) and patients' characteristics (age, gender, race, education, delirium, agitation-sedation, severity of illness, level of consciousness, prior intubation history, days intubated prior to study enrollment, and type of intubation) on duration of nurse talk during the 3-min interaction observation. RESULTS: Duration of nurse talk ranged from 0-123 s and varied significantly over the 4 observation sessions (p = .007). Averaging the duration of nurse talk over the observation sessions, differences in talk time between the units varied significantly by study group (p < .001). Talk duration was negatively associated with a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14 (p = .008). Length of intubation prior to study enrollment had a curvilinear relationship with talking duration (linear p = .002, quadratic p = .013); the point of inflection was at 23 days. Nurse characteristics were not significantly related to duration of nurse talk. CONCLUSION: Length of time the patient is intubated, and the patient's level of consciousness may influence duration of nurse communication in ICU.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Communication interactions between nurses and mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are typically brief. Factors associated with length of nurses' communication have not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between nurse and patient characteristics and duration of nurse talk. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, we calculated duration of nurse talk in the first 3-min of video-recorded communication observation sessions for each nurse-patient dyad (n = 89) in the SPEACS study (4 observation sessions/dyad, n = 356). In addition, we explored the association between nurses' characteristics (age, gender, credentials, nursing experience, and critical care experience) and patients' characteristics (age, gender, race, education, delirium, agitation-sedation, severity of illness, level of consciousness, prior intubation history, days intubated prior to study enrollment, and type of intubation) on duration of nurse talk during the 3-min interaction observation. RESULTS: Duration of nurse talk ranged from 0-123 s and varied significantly over the 4 observation sessions (p = .007). Averaging the duration of nurse talk over the observation sessions, differences in talk time between the units varied significantly by study group (p < .001). Talk duration was negatively associated with a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14 (p = .008). Length of intubation prior to study enrollment had a curvilinear relationship with talking duration (linear p = .002, quadratic p = .013); the point of inflection was at 23 days. Nurse characteristics were not significantly related to duration of nurse talk. CONCLUSION: Length of time the patient is intubated, and the patient's level of consciousness may influence duration of nurse communication in ICU.
Authors: Mary Beth Happ; Brooke M Baumann; Jennifer Sawicki; Judith A Tate; Elisabeth L George; Amber E Barnato Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Mary Beth Happ; Kathryn Garrett; Dana DiVirgilio Thomas; Judith Tate; Elisabeth George; Martin Houze; Jill Radtke; Susan Sereika Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: David S Friedman; Steven R Hahn; Harry A Quigley; Sameer Kotak; Elizabeth Kim; Meaghan Onofrey; Corey Eagan; Jack Mardekian Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mary Beth Happ; Kathryn L Garrett; Judith A Tate; Dana DiVirgilio; Martin P Houze; Jill R Demirci; Elisabeth George; Susan M Sereika Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Marci L Nilsen; Susan M Sereika; Leslie A Hoffman; Amber Barnato; Heidi Donovan; Mary Beth Happ Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 1.571