Literature DB >> 23304523

Production of a Thermostable and Alkaline Chitinase by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Strain HBK-51.

Secil Berna Kuzu1, Hatice Korkmaz Güvenmez, Aziz Akin Denizci.   

Abstract

This paper reports the isolation and identification of chitinase-producing Bacillus from chitin-containing wastes, production of a thermostable and alkaline chitinasese, and enzyme characterization. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HBK-51 was isolated from soil and was identified. Chitinase was obtained from supernatant of B. thuringiensis HBK-51 strain and showed its optimum activity at 110°C and at pH 9.0. Following 3 hours of incubation period, the enzyme showed a high level of activity at 110°C (96% remaining activity) and between pH 9.0 and 12.0 (98% remaining activity). Considering these characteristics, the enzyme was described as hyperthermophile-thermostable and highly alkaline. Two bands of the enzyme weighing 50 and 125 kDa were obtained following 12% SDS-PAGE analyses. Among the metal ions and chemicals used, Ni(2+) (32%), K(+) (44%), and Cu(2+) (56%) increased the enzyme activity while EDTA (7%), SDS (7%), Hg(2+) (11%), and ethyl-acetimidate (20%) decreased the activity of the enzyme. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HBK-51 is an important strain which can be used in several biotechnological applications as a chitinase producer.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23304523      PMCID: PMC3532916          DOI: 10.1155/2012/135498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Res Int        ISSN: 2090-3146


1. Introduction

Chitin, a linear β-(1,4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) polysaccharide, is the main structure component of the fungal cell wall and the exoskeletons of invertebrates, such as insects and crustaceans. Chitinase plays a variety of important roles in these organisms ranging from nutrition to defense and control of ecdysis in insects. The importance of chitinases in many biological processes makes their inhibitors important targets for potential antifungal and insecticidal agents as well as antimalarial agents [1]. It is one of the most abundant naturally occurring polysaccharides and has attracted tremendous attention in the fields of agriculture, pharmacology, and biotechnology. Chitin is the second most abundant component of biomass on earth [2]. This linear polymer can be hydrolyzed by bases, acids or enzymes, such as lysozyme, some glucanases, and chitinase. Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14), essential enzymes catalyzing the conversion of chitin to its monomeric or oligomeric components (low-molecular-weight products), have been found in a wide range of organisms, including bacteria, plants, fungi, insects, and crustaceans. Because chitin is not found in vertebrates, it has been suggested that inhibition of chitinases may be used for the treatment of fungal infections and human parasitosis [3]. Biological control, using microorganisms to repress plant disease, offers an alternative environmentally friendly strategy for controlling agricultural phytopathogens [4]. The production of inexpensive chitinolytic enzymes is an important element in the utilization of shellfish wastes that not only solves environmental problems but also promotes the economic value of marine products, so chitinases have been studied and purified from many microorganisms, and their enzymatic properties have been investigated [5]. Global annual recovery of chitin from the processing of marine crustacean waste is estimated to be around 37.300 metric tons [6].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Chitin-Azure was (Sigma-Aldrich), PMFS, Protein Marker (BSA), CBB R-250, DMSO and the others were purchased from Merck (Germany).

2.1.1. Isolation of Bacteria

Crabs, campus soil, and compost were mixed and held to approximately 30 days outside (exposure sun, rain or etc.). After this period, sterile distilled water was added to material and homogenized. 10 mL supernatant wae transferred to glass tube and incubated at 80°C for 10 min to eliminate vegetative forms of bacteria. 1 mL sample inoculated to 10 mL LB and incubated at 37°C for 6 hours and then sample was diluted 10−6 − 10−7 fold with freshly prepared LB, then streaked on N1 agar plate. After incubation at 37°C overnight, single colonies were selected (550 colonies in total) and stock cultures prepared [7].

2.2. Preparation of Colloidal Chitin

Preparation of colloidal chitin was performed from commercial chitin (C9752, Sigma-Aldrich Co, USA) according to Wen et al. [3] with minimal modifications. Fivegrams of chitin powder were added into 60 mL of concentrated HCL and left in refrigerator (at 4°C) overnight with vigorous stirring. The mixture was added to 2 litres of ice-cold Et-OH (95%) with rapid stirring and kept overnight at room temperature (at 22°C). The precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 6,000 ×g (4°C) for 25 min. The precipitate was washed with sterile distilled water until the colloidal chitin became neutral (pH 7.0) and then stored and at 4°C for further applications.

2.3. Screening Chitinase Producer Strains

All strains (total 550) were selected from soil including chitin wastes, tested one by one for chitinase activity on the CHDA (chitinase-detection agar). Chitinase producer strains were determined after 3–5 days at 37°C by visualizing the clear zone formed surrounding of the colonies on the CHDA plate. CHDA agar, used first detection of chitinase positive strains and preparation of stock culture, by adding 10% g of colloidal chitin and 20 g of agar in M9 medium containing (g/L); 0.65 NaHPO4, 1.5 KH2PO4, 0.5 NH4Cl, 0.12 MgSO4, 0.005 CaCl2, 0.25 NaCl, pH = 6.5 [3, 8].

2.4. Enzyme Production

HBK-51 strain (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki) was used as chitinase producer. 1 mL of HBK-51 strain fresh culture was inoculated into 10 mL of LB medium (containing 1% colloidal chitin as the sole source of C and N) and incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking (150 rev min⁡−1). The culture was transferred into a 2 litres glass bottle containing 500 mL M9-Medium which was supplemented with 1% colloidal chitin and incubated at 37°C on a rotary shaker at 150 rev min⁡−1 for 3 days [3]. The culture was centrifuged for 20 min at 9000 ×g, at 4°C and supernatant was separated from cell debris. Then supernatant was filtered (with filter paper) and precipitated with Et-OH (ethyl-alcohol) [9]. All experiments were done with this enzyme preparation.

2.5. Purification of the Chitinase

Proteins in the culturesupernatant fluid were precipitated with Et-OH (ethyl-alcohol) at −33°C overnight. Et-OH (ethyl-alcohol) was added 70% of the original volume of supernatant. The precipitate was recovered by centrifugation (12,000 ×g (4°C) for 30 min.), dissolved in a small amount of 0.1 M Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and stored at 4°C [10, 11].

2.6. Measurement of Enzyme Activity

Chitinase activity was measured with chitin-azure as a substrate [12]. Enzyme solution (0.5 mL) was added to substrate solution (0.5 mL), which contained 1.0% chitin azure in a sodium acetate buffer (100 mmol/L, pH 7.0), and the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 30 min. After centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 15 min, at 4°C), enzyme activity was measured at 595 nm absorbance using spectrophotometer. One unit of chitinase was the amount of enzyme that produced an increase of 0.01 in the absorbance [12, 13].

2.7. pH and Temperature Optima

The optimum pH and temperature were determined by incubation in a buffer at different pH values (3.0–10.0) and temperatures (30–120°C) under standard assay conditions using chitin-azure as the substrate. The buffers used were 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH: 3.0–6.0), 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH: 7.0–9.0), and 50 mM Glycine-NaOH buffer (pH: 10.0–12.0). The optimum temperature for enzyme activity was measured under standard assay in the range of 30–120°C with intervals of 10°C [14].

2.8. Thermal Stability

The effect of the temperature on the stability of chitinolytic enzyme was determined by exposure of the enzyme solution in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH: 9.0 (optimum pH) to different temperatures (30–110°C) for 3 h. The residual activity was then assayed under standard conditions using chitin-azure as the substrate [14, 15].

2.9. pH Stability

For pH stability assay, the enzyme solution was preincubated for 3 h at room temperature in the buffers of various pH values (pH: 5.0–12.0) and then the residual activity was determined under standard conditions [14, 15].

2.10. Plasmid Curing

All bacteria which produced chitinase were tested with EtBr for plasmid elimination according to Hardy [16].

2.11. Identification of Bacillus sp

Criteria used for classification and identification of Bacillus strain HBK-51 were based on morphological [7], physiological and biochemical tests (Table 1) [17], fatty acid analyses (FAME) (Sherlock-MIDI Automated Microbial Identification System version 4.0, MIDI inc., Newark, DE), and 16S RNA/DNA sequence analyses [14, 18, 19].
Table 1

Morphological and physiological characteristics of chitinase-producing bacteria strain HBK-51.

Morphological characteristics
 FormRod
 Gram stainPositive
 SporeTerminal spore forming
 CapsuleNegative
 MotilityPositive
Physiological characteristics
 CatalasePositive
 Hydrolysis of starchPositive
β-haemolysisPositive
 Cimons' CitratePositive
 Hydrolysis of gelatinNegative
 Hydrolysis of l lecithinNegative
 Indol formationNegative
 VP-TestNegative
 UreaseNegative

2.12. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Comparison

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with forward primers:and reverse primers: The amplified PCR product was sequenced by the Beckman Coulter-CQ 8800 model sequence analyzer with their methods. The 16S rDNA sequence was aligned with other 16S rDNA bacterial sequence obtained from GenBank by basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) program [20]. 27F 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ (8–27 position), 530F 5′-GTGCCAGAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′ (515–533 position) 1525R 5′-AAGGAGGTGWTCCRCC-3′ (1541–1525 position) 1100R 5′-AGGGTTGCGCTCGTTG-3′ (1115–1100 position).

2.13. The Influence of Chemicals (Metal Ions, Chelators, and Detergents)

The chemicals were used in two different concentrations (Table 2). These chemicals' effect on chitinolytic activity was determined by incubating 0.5 mL enzyme with 1–5 mM EDTA, PMSF, 1,10-Phenanthroline, ethyl-acetimidate, Phenol Gliaksol, N-Ethylmaleimide, Urea, Na2SO3, NaCl, CaCl2, ZnCl2, MgCl2, BaCl2, FeCl3, MnCl2, CuCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, KCl, HgCl2, and 1–5% SDS and DMSO for 30 min at room temperature after which the residual activity was measured with standard assay [21].
Table 2

Influence of chemicals on chitinase activity.

Chemical Con. Act. (%)
control 100
DMSO1%92
5%92
EDTA1 mM95
5 mM93
Ethyl acetimidate 1 mM90
5 mM80
SDS1 mM97
5 mM93
Phenol Gliaksol1 mM92
5 mM104
1,10-Phenanthroline1 mM90
5 mM100
N-Ethylmaleimide1 mM106
5 mM89
PMSF1 mM108
5 mM81
Urea1 mM106
5 mM80
Na-Sulphite1 mM98
5 mM96
MgCl2 1 mM100
5 mM90
NaCl2 1 mM97
5 mM93
BaCl2 1 mM101
5 mM87
FeCl3 1 mM81
5 mM106
MnCl2 1 mM118
5 mM77
CuCl2 1 mM127
5 mM155
CoCl2 1 mM115
5 mM116
NiCl2 1 mM132
5 mM123
ZnCl2 1 mM118
5 mM106
KCl2 1 mM127
5 mM144
CaCl2 1 mM94
5 mM106
HgCl2 1 mM93
5 mM89

Con: Concentration, Act: Activity.

The enzyme was incubated with various ions and reagents at room temperature for 30 min., then chitinase activity was assayed under standard conditions. The enzyme activity without any additive was taken as 100%.

2.14. SDS-PAGE Analyses

The enzyme molecular weight was determined with sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) [22]. The gel was prepared using 5% stacking gel and 12% of separating gel (Acr : Bis = 29 : 1). After electrophoresis gel was stained with CBB-R 250 then visualized by placing the gel to the Minibus Gel Apparatus, BSA (Sigma) was used as a MW marker.

3. Results and Discussion

Chitinase producing bacteria were isolated from chitin wastes on CHDA (chitinase detection agar, Figure 1) and chitinase was produced in the media containing 1% of colloidal chitin [3]. In total, 550 strains were selected from chitin wastes and tested for chitinolytic activity. After screening the strains for their ability to utilize chitin, 12 of them (2.18%) showed chitinolytic activity. 6 strains were showed the highest hydrolysis zone (4–10 mm) on CHDA agar. They were termed HBK-30, HBK-36, HBK-37, HBK-42, HBK-43, and HBK-51. HBK-51 strain was selected as chitinase producer.
Figure 1

Chitinase activity on CHDA plate.

The HBK-51 strain was identified according to morphological and physiological characteristics (are presented in Table 1) [17]. According to Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [7], strain HBK-51 was classified as a bacteria belonging to the genus Bacillus. Further sequence analysis of the gene encoding 16S rRNA and fatty acid analyses (FAME, data not shown) confirmed the isolate as being Bacillus genus and according to BLAST confirmation, it was Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. Theamplified16S rRNA sequence was submitted to GenBank for possible identification. The result showed 99.00% identity with Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. The accession number is EU153549. Chitinolytic activity of HBK-51 on CHDA is shown in Figure 1. According to the plasmid-curing tests, the gene of encoding chitinase of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HBK-51 was located on chromosomal.

3.1. pH and Temperature Optima

The pH effect on the chitinase activity was determined using three buffer systems at various pH values. The HBK-51 chitinase was active at broad range of pH (3.0–10.0) but had optimum activity at pH 9.0 (data shown Figure 5), when assayed with chitin azure as a substrate. On the other hand, enzyme was active from 30 to 120°C and exhibited maximum activity at 110°C (Figure 3). The enzyme was stable (after 3 hours incubation period) at 30–120°C and pH 9.0–12.0 and generally, protected original activity approximately 92.4% (Figure 4) and 98% (Figure 6), respectively, at 90°C chitinase was 100% active and at 100–110°C had shown 96% retain activity. Therefore, HBK-51 chitinase was called as thermostable at high temperatures. Siwayaprahm et al. [23] reported that for Bacillus circulans No. 4.1. recombinant chitinase, the optima pH and temperature were 7.0 and 45°C, respectively, and it was stable in the pH range of 5.0–9.0 and at temperatures up to 50°C. Lee et al. [24] reported that Bacillus sp. DAU101 chitinase had optimum activity pH 7.5 and 60°C, Wen et al. [3] reported chitinase activity of Bacillus sp. NCTU2 had in the range of 50–60°C at pH 7.0. Kim et al. [14] reported Serratia sp. KCK chitinase had broad range of pH (5.0–10.0) with an optimum value 0f 8.0 and 40°C, respectively. Li et al. [25] reported Bacillus cereus strain CH2 had optimum activity at pH 7.1 and temperature at 40°C. According to these results, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HBK-51 chitinase is a thermotolerant and alkaline enzyme. Guo et al. [26] reported that Thermomyces lanuginosus SY2 chitinase exhibited optimum catalytic activity at pH 4.5, 55°C and enzyme was stable at 50°C and its half-life time at 65°C was 25 min. On the other hand, they reported that the thermostable chitinase had major advantages over industrial catalysis for its high activity at high temperature. Thermostable chitinase could be useful for the chitin industry and biotechnological applications.
Figure 5

Effect of pH on chitinase activity.

Figure 3

Effect of temperature on the chitinase activity.

Figure 4

Thermal stability of chitinase.

Figure 6

pH stability of chitinase.

3.2. Influence of Chemicals and SDS-PAGE Analyses

The effects of various chemicals on enzyme activity were tested (Table 2) in the presence (at 1–5 mM concentrations) of Co2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, K+, Cu2+ enzyme activity was slightly enhanced by 16%, 18%, 32%, 44%, 56%, respectively. Wen et al. [3] reported that Bacillus sp. NCTU2 chitinase activity was enhanced by ≈100% in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+. In the presence of Hg2+ and Cu2+ (at 10 mM) enzyme activity lost by 95%. Yuli et al. [27] reported that effect of metal ions on chitinase activity was quite different. In the presence of EDTA, SDS, HgCl2, ethyl=acetimidate the enzyme activity was partially inhibited by 7%, 7%, 11%, 20%, respectively, but (Table 2) other chemicals weakly affected enzyme activity. The enzyme molecular weight revealed as 125 and 50 kDa (Figure 2). Similar results were indicated by the other chitinase researchers by SDS-PAGE analyses: Aeromonas sp. chitinases was different in the range of 89–120 kDa [28], Bacillus sp. chitinase around 25–80 kDa [29], Streptomyces strain 68 chitinase, 25, 35, 67 and 200 kDa [30], Bacillus sp. NCTU2 chitinase 36.5 kDa [3], Bacillus cereus strain CH2 chitinase 15 kDa [25], and Thermomyces lanuginosus SY2 chitinase molecular size was estimated to be 48 kDa [26].
Figure 2

Chitinase molecular weight pattern of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki strain HBK-51. M: Protein Marker (BSA, 66 kDa), C: Chitinase.

Chitinases have a broad spectrum of different industrial applications such as bio-control agents against plant pathogens (fungi) and insects (bio-insecticide friend with environment) and bioconversion of chitin waste to single-cell protein, Et-OH and fertilizer [14]. The thermostable chitinase had major advantages over industrial catalysis for its high activity at high temperature [26]. The properties of thermostable chitinase suggest that it could be useful for the chitin industry and biotechnological applications.
  17 in total

1.  Antifungal activity and enhancement of plant growth by Bacillus cereus grown on shellfish chitin wastes.

Authors:  Wen-Teish Chang; Yu-Chung Chen; Chia-Ling Jao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Chitinolytic enzymes: their contribution to basic and applied research.

Authors:  S A Shaikh; M V Deshpande
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Purification and some properties of six chitinases from Aeromonas sp. no. 10S-24.

Authors:  M Ueda; A Fujiwara; T Kawaguchi; M Arai
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.043

4.  A simple and rapid method for the preparation of gram-negative bacterial genomic DNA.

Authors:  W P Chen; T T Kuo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzymes of Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48.

Authors:  J Frankowski; M Lorito; F Scala; R Schmid; G Berg; H Bahl
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 2.552

6.  Characterization of a chitinolytic enzyme from Serratia sp. KCK isolated from kimchi juice.

Authors:  Hyun-Soo Kim; Kenneth N Timmis; Peter N Golyshin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Identification of a chitin-binding protein secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J Folders; J Tommassen; L C van Loon; W Bitter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Newly isolated Bacillus clausii GMBAE 42: an alkaline protease producer capable to grow under higly alkaline conditions.

Authors:  A A Denizci; D Kazan; E C A Abeln; A Erarslan
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Purification, characterization and cloning of a chitinase from Bacillus sp. NCTU2.

Authors:  Chih-Min Wen; Chien-Sheng Tseng; Chih-Yu Cheng; Yaw-Kuen Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Purification and characterization of thermostable chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis SK-1.

Authors:  Sanya Kudan; Rath Pichyangkura
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.926

View more
  9 in total

1.  Extracellular Antifungal Activity of Chitinase-Producing Bacteria Isolated From Guano of Insectivorous Bats.

Authors:  Delfini Cd; Villegas Lb; Martínez Ma; Baigorí Md
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  A Contemporary Appraisal on Impending Industrial and Agricultural Applications of Thermophilic-Recombinant Chitinolytic Enzymes from Microbial Sources.

Authors:  Fatima Akram; Zuriat Jabbar; Amna Aqeel; Ikram Ul Haq; Shahbaz Tariq; Kausar Malik
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Isolation and characterization of Burkholderia rinojensis sp. nov., a non-Burkholderia cepacia complex soil bacterium with insecticidal and miticidal activities.

Authors:  Ana Lucia Cordova-Kreylos; Lorena E Fernandez; Marja Koivunen; April Yang; Lina Flor-Weiler; Pamela G Marrone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Draft Genome Sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain BrMgv02-JM63, a Chitinolytic Bacterium Isolated from Oil-Contaminated Mangrove Soil in Brazil.

Authors:  Joelma Marcon; Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani; Francisco Dini-Andreote; Giulia Inocêncio Mazzero; Fabio Lino Soares; Itamar Soares Melo; João Lúcio Azevedo; Fernando Dini Andreote
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-01-30

5.  Molecular docking and site-directed mutagenesis of a Bacillus thuringiensis chitinase to improve chitinolytic, synergistic lepidopteran-larvicidal and nematicidal activities.

Authors:  Hong Ni; Siquan Zeng; Xu Qin; Xiaowen Sun; Shan Zhang; Xiuyun Zhao; Ziniu Yu; Lin Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 6.  Glycoside Hydrolases and Glycosyltransferases from Hyperthermophilic Archaea: Insights on Their Characteristics and Applications in Biotechnology.

Authors:  Khadija Amin; Sylvain Tranchimand; Thierry Benvegnu; Ziad Abdel-Razzak; Hala Chamieh
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-21

7.  Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD1 as a factory to synthesize alkali-labile ChiA74∆sp chitinase inclusions, Cry crystals and spores for applied use.

Authors:  José Eleazar Barboza-Corona; Jorge Luis Delgadillo-Ángeles; José Cristóbal Castañeda-Ramírez; Uriel Eleazar Barboza-Pérez; Luz Edith Casados-Vázquez; Dennis K Bideshi; Ma Cristina del Rincón-Castro
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Thermostable chitinase from Cohnella sp. A01: isolation and product optimization.

Authors:  Nasrin Aliabadi; Saeed Aminzadeh; Ali Asghar Karkhane; Kamahldin Haghbeen
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Nocardia farcinica as a cause of chronic meningitis - case report.

Authors:  Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska; Piotr Czupryna; Izabela Swiecicka; Henryk Grześ; Agnieszka Siemieniako; Sambor Grygorczuk; Eugeniusz Tarasów; Sławomir Pancewicz
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.