Literature DB >> 23303858

Active recognition enhances the representation of behaviorally relevant information in single auditory forebrain neurons.

Daniel P Knudsen1, Timothy Q Gentner.   

Abstract

Sensory systems are dynamic. They must process a wide range of natural signals that facilitate adaptive behaviors in a manner that depends on an organism's constantly changing goals. A full understanding of the sensory physiology that underlies adaptive natural behaviors must therefore account for the activity of sensory systems in light of these behavioral goals. Here we present a novel technique that combines in vivo electrophysiological recording from awake, freely moving songbirds with operant conditioning techniques that allow control over birds' recognition of conspecific song, a widespread natural behavior in songbirds. We show that engaging in a vocal recognition task alters the response properties of neurons in the caudal mesopallium (CM), an avian analog of mammalian auditory cortex, in European starlings. Compared with awake, passive listening, active engagement of subjects in an auditory recognition task results in neurons responding to fewer song stimuli and a decrease in the trial-to-trial variability in their driven firing rates. Mean firing rates also change during active recognition, but not uniformly. Relative to nonengaged listening, active recognition causes increases in the driven firing rates in some neurons, decreases in other neurons, and stimulus-specific changes in other neurons. These changes lead to both an increase in stimulus selectivity and an increase in the information conveyed by the neurons about the animals' behavioral task. This study demonstrates the behavioral dependence of neural responses in the avian auditory forebrain and introduces the starling as a model for real-time monitoring of task-related neural processing of complex auditory objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303858      PMCID: PMC3628005          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00461.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  Induction of behavioral associative memory by stimulation of the nucleus basalis.

Authors:  Dewey E McLin; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neuronal bases of categorization in starling song.

Authors:  M Hausberger; E Leppelsack; J Richard; H J Leppelsack
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Bird calls: their potential for behavioral neurobiology.

Authors:  Peter Marler
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Auditory processing of vocal sounds in birds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Sarita S Shaevitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Adaptive changes in cortical receptive fields induced by attention to complex sounds.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Single cell activity in the auditory cortex of Rhesus monkeys: behavioral dependency.

Authors:  J M Miller; D Sutton; B Pfingst; A Ryan; R Beaton; G Gourevitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Temporal scales of auditory objects underlying birdsong vocal recognition.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  8 in total

1.  Response properties of single neurons in higher level auditory cortex of adult songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah W Bottjer; Andrew A Ronald; Tiara Kaye
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Development of neural responsivity to vocal sounds in higher level auditory cortex of songbirds.

Authors:  Vanessa C Miller-Sims; Sarah W Bottjer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hierarchical effects of task engagement on amplitude modulation encoding in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mamiko Niwa; Kevin N O'Connor; Elizabeth Engall; Jeffrey S Johnson; M L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Associative learning enhances population coding by inverting interneuronal correlation patterns.

Authors:  James M Jeanne; Tatyana O Sharpee; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Pattern-Induced Covert Category Learning in Songbirds.

Authors:  Jordan A Comins; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Spike Train Coactivity Encodes Learned Natural Stimulus Invariances in Songbird Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Brad Theilman; Krista Perks; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Estradiol differentially affects auditory recognition and learning according to photoperiodic state in the adult male songbird, European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Rebecca M Calisi; Daniel P Knudsen; Jesse S Krause; John C Wingfield; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Dissociation of task engagement and arousal effects in auditory cortex and midbrain.

Authors:  Daniela Saderi; Zachary P Schwartz; Charles R Heller; Jacob R Pennington; Stephen V David
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.