Literature DB >> 23303522

Background selection 20 years on: the Wilhelmine E. Key 2012 invitational lecture.

Brian Charlesworth1.   

Abstract

The mutation process continually produces new deleterious variants at sites throughout the genome, which are then mostly eliminated by selection. This causes a reduction in variability at linked neutral or nearly neutral sites, as well as distortions of the genealogies of samples of alleles from a population. In regions of the genome where recombination is frequent, the effects of selection against deleterious mutations on variability and evolution at linked sites can be predicted under the assumption that most deleterious mutations have such large effects that their behavior in the population is effectively deterministic-this is background selection in the strict sense. But in genomic regions with little or no recombination, such as the Y chromosome, large departures from the predictions using deterministic models may occur, because of interference between different sites under selection. Evidence from Drosophila and human populations is discussed, which suggests that these processes play a major role in shaping patterns of DNA sequence variation and evolution, including the relative levels of variation on X chromosomes and autosomes, and the highly reduced variability seen in regions that lack crossing over.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23303522     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/ess136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  26 in total

1.  Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection and recombination.

Authors:  Lauren E Nicolaisen; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dynamics and Fate of Beneficial Mutations Under Lineage Contamination by Linked Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Sophie Pénisson; Tanya Singh; Paul Sniegowski; Philip Gerrish
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Local PCA Shows How the Effect of Population Structure Differs Along the Genome.

Authors:  Han Li; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The demography and population genomics of evolutionary transitions to self-fertilization in plants.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett; Ramesh Arunkumar; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Joint Prediction of the Effective Population Size and the Rate of Fixation of Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.