BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. After surgery, tumors are classified according to the depth of tumor invasion, nodal involvement, and tumor regression grade. However, these staging systems do not provide information about the distribution of residual cancer cells within the bowel wall. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall in rectal cancer specimens. DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective phase II study. SETTING: This study was performed in a multi-institutional setting. PATIENTS: Included were 153 patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with chemoradiation and surgery. The surgical specimen tumor tissue was analyzed, and the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall was determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical analysis was used to examine the correlation of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall with the clinical/pathologic stage and tumor regression grade. RESULTS: Forty-two of 153 (27%) patients had complete response in the bowel wall (ypT0). Of the remaining 111 patients who had residual cancer cells, 5 (3%) were ypTis, 12 (8%) were ypT1, 41 (27%) were ypT2, 50 (33%) were ypT3, and 3 (2%) were ypT4. Of the 94 patients with ypT2-4 tumors, 12 (13%) had cancer cells in the mucosa, and 53 (56%) had cancer cells in the submucosa; 92 (98%) had cancer cells in the muscularis propria. Pretreatment cT correlated with the distribution of residual cancer cells. Tumor regression grade was not associated with the distribution of residual cancer cells after chemoradiation. LIMITATIONS: : Patients received different chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Residual cancer cells in rectal cancer specimens after chemoradiation are preferentially located close to the invasive front. This should be considered when designing strategies to diagnose complete pathologic response and when investigating the mechanisms of tumor resistance to chemoradiation.
BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. After surgery, tumors are classified according to the depth of tumor invasion, nodal involvement, and tumor regression grade. However, these staging systems do not provide information about the distribution of residual cancer cells within the bowel wall. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall in rectal cancer specimens. DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective phase II study. SETTING: This study was performed in a multi-institutional setting. PATIENTS: Included were 153 patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were treated with chemoradiation and surgery. The surgical specimen tumor tissue was analyzed, and the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall was determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical analysis was used to examine the correlation of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall with the clinical/pathologic stage and tumor regression grade. RESULTS: Forty-two of 153 (27%) patients had complete response in the bowel wall (ypT0). Of the remaining 111 patients who had residual cancer cells, 5 (3%) were ypTis, 12 (8%) were ypT1, 41 (27%) were ypT2, 50 (33%) were ypT3, and 3 (2%) were ypT4. Of the 94 patients with ypT2-4 tumors, 12 (13%) had cancer cells in the mucosa, and 53 (56%) had cancer cells in the submucosa; 92 (98%) had cancer cells in the muscularis propria. Pretreatment cT correlated with the distribution of residual cancer cells. Tumor regression grade was not associated with the distribution of residual cancer cells after chemoradiation. LIMITATIONS: : Patients received different chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Residual cancer cells in rectal cancer specimens after chemoradiation are preferentially located close to the invasive front. This should be considered when designing strategies to diagnose complete pathologic response and when investigating the mechanisms of tumor resistance to chemoradiation.
Authors: Julio Garcia-Aguilar; David D Smith; Karin Avila; Emily K Bergsland; Peiguo Chu; Richard M Krieg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Julio García-Aguilar; Enrique Hernandez de Anda; Prayuth Sirivongs; Suk-Hwan Lee; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Zhenbin Chen; David D Smith; Wenyan Li; Robert D Madoff; Peter Cataldo; Jorge Marcet; Carlos Pastor Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M W Onaitis; R B Noone; R Fields; H Hurwitz; M Morse; P Jowell; K McGrath; C Lee; M S Anscher; B Clary; C Mantyh; T N Pappas; K Ludwig; H F Seigler; D S Tyler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Isabelle Bedrosian; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Barry Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Lee Ellis; Steven A Curley; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Marc Delclos; Christopher Crane; Nora Janjan; John M Skibber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Angelita Habr-Gama; Maria Regina Vianna; Guilherme P São Julião; Viviane Rawet; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues; Igor Proscurshim; Jacyara Alves; Laura M Fernandez; Rodrigo O Perez Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Luis J García-Flórez; Guillermo Gómez-Álvarez; Ana M Frunza; Luis Barneo-Serra; Manuel F Fresno-Forcelledo Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-09-27