Literature DB >> 22351592

The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

F M Smith1, K H Chang, K Sheahan, J Hyland, P R O'Connell, D C Winter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local excision of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been proposed as an alternative to radical surgery in selected patients. However, little is known about the significance of the morphological and histological features of residual tumour.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone CRT at the authors' institution between 1997 and 2010 were identified. Multiple features were assessed as putative markers of pathological response. These included: gross residual disease, diameter of residual mucosal abnormalities, tumour differentiation, presence of lymphovascular/perineural invasion and lymph node ratio.
RESULTS: Data from 220 of 276 patients were suitable for analysis. Diameter of residual mucosal abnormalities correlated strongly with pathological tumour category after CRT (ypT) (P < 0·001). Forty of 42 tumours downstaged to ypT0/1 had residual mucosal abnormalities of 2·99 cm or less after CRT. Importantly, 19 of 31 patients with a complete pathological response had evidence of a residual mucosal abnormality consistent with an incomplete clinical response. The ypT category was associated with both pathological node status after CRT (P < 0·001) and lymph node ratio (P < 0·001). Positive nodes were found in only one of 42 patients downstaged to ypT0/1. The risk of nodal metastases was associated with poor differentiation (P = 0·027) and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION: In this series, the majority of patients with a complete pathological response did not have a complete clinical response. In tumours downstaged to ypT0/1 after CRT, residual mucosal abnormalities were predominantly small and had a 2 per cent risk of positive nodes, thus potentially facilitating transanal excision. The presence of adverse histological characteristics risk stratified tumours for nodal metastases.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22351592     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  35 in total

Review 1.  Local Excision and Endoscopic Resections for Early Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Juan Pablo Celentano; Flavia Andrea Alexandre; Bruna Borba Vailati
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 2.  Organ-Preserving Strategies for the Management of Near-Complete Responses in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Patricio B Lynn; Paul Strombom; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 3.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Evidence-based surgery of rectal cancer].

Authors:  M Grade; H Flebbe; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Management of distal rectal cancer: results from a national survey.

Authors:  G Melotti; E De Antoni; A Habr-Gama; A Minicozzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-01-19

6.  Assessment of a novel, full-thickness incisional biopsy model to restage rectal tumours after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results of an ex vivo pilot study.

Authors:  F M Smith; H Wiland; A Mace; R K Pai; M F Kalady
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  The split scar sign as an indicator of sustained complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Inês Santiago; Maria Barata; Nuno Figueiredo; Oriol Parés; Vanessa Henriques; António Galzerano; Carlos Carvalho; Celso Matos; Richard J Heald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2N0 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Giuseppe Giraudo; Mario Morino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Paola De Nardi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Luis J García-Flórez; Jorge L Otero-Díez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.