Literature DB >> 23302416

The comparison of standard and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures.

Ismail Nalbant1, Ufuk Ozturk, Nevzat Can Sener, Onur Dede, Ahmet Murat Bayraktar, M Abdurrahim Imamoglu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter).
RESULTS: Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm(2) and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm(2) respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23302416     DOI: 10.1590/1677-553820133806795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  5 in total

1.  Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?

Authors:  Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Hee Kim; Kwang Taek Kim; Tae Beom Kim; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

2.  The clinical research of 1,470 nm laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yunwu Wang; Xiaolei Tang; Hongye Hu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-10

3.  Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  N Moosanejad; A Firouzian; S A Hashemi; M Bahari; M Fazli
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Sebaey; Mostafa M Khalil; Tarek Soliman; Ahmed Mohey; Walid Elshaer; Wael Kandil; Rabea Omar
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-01-20

5.  Totally tubeless single access tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in treatment of large burden > 2-cm and/or complex renal stones: a case series of 62 patients.

Authors:  Chang-Heng Lin; Ying-Chen Lin; Heng-Chieh Chiang; Meng-Yi Yan; Wan-Yun Fang; Pao-Hwa Chen
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.