Literature DB >> 23299132

Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Kang Hong Lee1, Joyce Ho, Yasir Akmal, Rebecca Nelson, Alessio Pigazzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (IA) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer compared with extracorporeal anastomosis (EA).
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 86 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer from March 2005 to June 2010 was performed.
RESULTS: There were 51 and 35 patients who underwent intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis, respectively. The two groups were demographically comparable. The conversion rate to open surgery was 8.6 % in the EA group, but none in the IA group (p = 0.064). There was no significant difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, complications (intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, ileus, and wound infection), and length of hospital stay between the groups. There was no perioperative mortality in both groups. There was no significant difference in median number of retrieved lymph node. The overall survival and the disease-free survival at 3 years were not different between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the extracorporeal anastomosis technique, intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis produces comparable short- and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23299132     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2698-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy techniques.

Authors:  Rasmy Loungnarath; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2003-12

3.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?

Authors:  Ioannis Raftopoulos; Anita P Courcoulas; David Blumberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.

Authors:  M Braga; M Frasson; W Zuliani; A Vignali; N Pecorelli; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer.

Authors:  M Pascual; S Alonso; D Parés; R Courtier; M J Gil; L Grande; M Pera
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians.

Authors:  Ji Won Park; Sang-Woo Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae Hwan Oh; Seok-Byung Lim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  27 in total

1.  Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the enterotomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a single-center study.

Authors:  S Reggio; A Sciuto; D Cuccurullo; F Pirozzi; F Esposito; D Cusano; F Corcione
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Mark H Hanna; Grace S Hwang; Michael J Phelan; Thanh-Lan Bui; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven D Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Ron Shapiro; Uri Keler; Lior Segev; Stav Sarna; Kamal Hatib; David Hazzan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ashley S Vergis; Sarah N Steigerwald; Faizal D Bhojani; Paul A Sullivan; Krista M Hardy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Robotic ileocolic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  H Hande Aydinli; Marissa Anderson; Amanda Hambrecht; Mitchell A Bernstein; Alexis L Grucela
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-07-28

6.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Bollo; P Salas; M C Martinez; P Hernandez; A Rabal; E Carrillo; E Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Giampaolo Formisano; Pasquale Misitano; Giuseppe Giuliani; Giulia Calamati; Lucia Salvischiani; Paolo Pietro Bianchi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

8.  Barbed versus traditional suture for enterotomy closure after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Francesco Feroci; Iacopo Giani; Maddalena Baraghini; Luca Romoli; Tiku Zalla; Roberto Quattromani; Stefano Cantafio; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

9.  Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  L Martinek; K You; S Giuratrabocchetta; M Gachabayov; K Lee; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Postoperative Ileus in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Carolina Quiroga-Centeno; Kihara Alejandra Jerez-Torra; Pedro Antonio Martin-Mojica; Sergio Andrés Castañeda-Alfonso; María Emma Castillo-Sánchez; Oscar Fernando Calvo-Corredor; Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.