Literature DB >> 23298101

Weighted-peak assessment of occupational exposure due to MRI gradient fields and movements in a nonhomogeneous static magnetic field.

D Andreuccetti1, G M Contessa, R Falsaperla, R Lodato, R Pinto, N Zoppetti, P Rossi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A procedure for assessing occupational exposure due to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gradient magnetic fields and movement-induced effects in the static magnetic field is proposed and tested.
METHODS: The procedure was based on the application of the weighted-peak method in time domain. It was tested in two 1.5 T total-body and one 3 T head-only scanner MRI facilities in Rome (Italy). Exposure due to switched gradient fields was evaluated in locations inside the magnet room where operators usually stay during particular medical procedures (e.g., cardiac examinations of anesthetized patients); MRI sequences were selected to approach as far as possible a representative worst case exposure scenario. Movement-induced effects were evaluated considering the actual movements of volunteer operators during work activity, by measuring the perceived time-varying magnetic field by a head-worn probe. The analysis of results was based on ICNIRP 1998 and 2010 guidelines, following a weighted-peak approach and including an ad hoc extension to the latter ones, needed to verify compliance in the frequency range 0-1 Hz.
RESULTS: Exposures due to switched gradient fields in 1.5 T MRI scanners mostly resulted noncompliant with ICNIRP 1998 occupational reference levels, being, at the same time, always compliant with ICNIRP 2010 ones. Gradient field levels and ICNIRP indexes were significantly lower for the 3 T unit, due to its small dimensions, as that unit was a head-only scanner. Movement-induced effects resulted potentially noncompliant only in the case the operator moved the head inside the bore of a 1.5 T scanner.
CONCLUSIONS: The procedure had proven to be a sound approach to exposure assessment in MRI. Its testing allowed to draw some general considerations about exposures to gradient magnetic fields and movement-induced effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298101     DOI: 10.1118/1.4771933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatahi; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Amirmohammad Fattahi; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

Review 5.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields from medical sources.

Authors:  Rianne Stam; Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Assessment of the Exposure to Gradient Magnetic Fields Generated by MRI Tomographs: Measurement Method, Verification of Limits and Clearance Areas through a Web-Based Platform.

Authors:  Riccardo Di Liberto; Daniele Andreuccetti; Moreno Comelli; Giancarlo Burriesci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.