Literature DB >> 23298075

Impact of variable RBE on proton fractionation.

Alexandru Dasu1, Iuliana Toma-Dasu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the impact of variable proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) on dose fractionation for clinically relevant situations. A generic RBE = 1.1 is generally used for isoeffect calculations, while experimental studies showed that proton RBE varies with tissue type, dose, and linear energy transfer (LET).
METHODS: An analytical expression for the LET and α∕β dependence of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model has been used for proton simulations in parallel with the assumption of a generic RBE = 1.1. Calculations have been performed for ranges of LET values and fractionation sensitivities to describe clinically relevant cases, such as the treatment of head and neck and prostate tumors. Isoeffect calculations were compared with predictions from a generic RBE value and reported clinical results.
RESULTS: The generic RBE = 1.1 appears to be a reasonable estimate for the proton RBE of rapidly growing tissues irradiated with low LET radiation. However, the use of a variable RBE predicts larger differences for tissues with low α∕β (both tumor and normal) and at low doses per fraction. In some situations these differences may appear in contrast to the findings from photon studies highlighting the importance of accurate accounting for the radiobiological effectiveness of protons. Furthermore, the use of variable RBE leads to closer predictions to clinical results.
CONCLUSIONS: The LET dependence of the RBE has a strong impact on the predicted effectiveness of fractionated proton radiotherapy. The magnitude of the effect is modulated by the fractionation sensitivity and the fractional dose indicating the need for accurate analyses both in the target and around it. Care should therefore be employed for changing clinical fractionation patterns or when analyzing results from clinical studies for this type of radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298075     DOI: 10.1118/1.4769417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparative Risk Predictions of Second Cancers After Carbon-Ion Therapy Versus Proton Therapy.

Authors:  John G Eley; Thomas Friedrich; Kenneth L Homann; Rebecca M Howell; Michael Scholz; Marco Durante; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 8.013

5.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 7.  Proton radiobiology.

Authors:  Francesco Tommasino; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Investigating the Implications of a Variable RBE on Proton Dose Fractionation Across a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanned Spread-Out Bragg Peak.

Authors:  Thomas I Marshall; Pankaj Chaudhary; Anna Michaelidesová; Jana Vachelová; Marie Davídková; Vladimir Vondráček; Giuseppe Schettino; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Proton beam irradiation inhibits the migration of melanoma cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jasińska-Konior; Katarzyna Pochylczuk; Elżbieta Czajka; Marta Michalik; Bożena Romanowska-Dixon; Jan Swakoń; Krystyna Urbańska; Martyna Elas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.