Literature DB >> 23297921

Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.

Jessica R Sullivan1, Linda M Thibodeau, Peter F Assmann.   

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that individuals with normal hearing (NH) experience a perceptual advantage for speech recognition in interrupted noise compared to continuous noise. In contrast, adults with hearing impairment (HI) and younger children with NH receive a minimal benefit. The objective of this investigation was to assess whether auditory training in interrupted noise would improve speech recognition in noise for children with HI and perhaps enhance their utilization of glimpsing skills. A partially-repeated measures design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of seven 1-h sessions of auditory training in interrupted and continuous noise. Speech recognition scores in interrupted and continuous noise were obtained from pre-, post-, and 3 months post-training from 24 children with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Children who participated in auditory training in interrupted noise demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in speech recognition compared to those who trained in continuous noise. Those who trained in interrupted noise demonstrated similar improvements in both noise conditions while those who trained in continuous noise only showed modest improvements in the interrupted noise condition. This study presents direct evidence that auditory training in interrupted noise can be beneficial in improving speech recognition in noise for children with HI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23297921      PMCID: PMC3548893          DOI: 10.1121/1.4770247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Elena Dominguez-Marin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.

Authors:  S P Bacon; J M Opie; D Y Montoya
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise.

Authors:  P A Howard-Jones; S Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  T Finitzo-Hieber; T W Tillman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

8.  Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children.

Authors:  Andrew Stuart
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Andrea L Pittman; Brenda M Hoover; Dawna E Lewis; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

10.  Children's perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home.

Authors:  Julie E Dockrell; Bridget Shield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jessica R Sullivan; Peter F Assmann; Shaikat Hossain; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning?

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Bernhard Ross; Kayo Inoue; Katrina McClannahan; Gregory Collet
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-20

3.  Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.