PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant compared with the dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant in patients with noninfectious uveitis. DESIGN: Comparative case series. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven eyes received either the fluocinolone acetonide (FA) (n=16) or dexamethasone (n=11) implant. METHODS: Chart review of patients at the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI) was done and patients were selected and matched according to age, sex, and type of uveitis. Eyes that received either the FA or dexamethasone implant, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 2 years, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The recurrence rate of uveitis after implantation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic characteristics. The majority of cases were idiopathic panuveitis, with 36.4% and 31.3% of eyes in the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively. Recurrence rates of uveitis were 1.7 and 0.5 per 100 person-months in the Retisert and Ozurdex groups, respectively, with Retisert-implanted eyes 3.16 times more at risk of recurrence; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.41). No significant differences were seen in terms of improvement in inflammatory score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The median survival time for a second implant was 13 and 28 months for the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively (P=0.0028). Eyes with the Ozurdex were 5 times more likely to receive a second implant (P=0.02). No eyes in the Ozurdex group needed additional glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser compared to 44% of eyes in the Retisert group. Eyes with the Retisert implant had a statistically higher rate of having more glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser (P=0.02). In the Ozurdex group, 50% of phakic eyes at baseline had cataract progression and subsequent surgery compared with 100% of Retisert phakic eyes. Eyes with the Retisert implant are 4.7 times more at risk of cataract progression (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant seems comparable to the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant in preventing recurrence of noninfectious uveitis and in improving inflammation and BCVA. However, there were higher rates of cataract progression and need for glaucoma medications, laser, and surgery with the Retisert implant.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant compared with the dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant in patients with noninfectious uveitis. DESIGN: Comparative case series. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven eyes received either the fluocinolone acetonide (FA) (n=16) or dexamethasone (n=11) implant. METHODS: Chart review of patients at the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI) was done and patients were selected and matched according to age, sex, and type of uveitis. Eyes that received either the FA or dexamethasone implant, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 2 years, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The recurrence rate of uveitis after implantation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic characteristics. The majority of cases were idiopathic panuveitis, with 36.4% and 31.3% of eyes in the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively. Recurrence rates of uveitis were 1.7 and 0.5 per 100 person-months in the Retisert and Ozurdex groups, respectively, with Retisert-implanted eyes 3.16 times more at risk of recurrence; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.41). No significant differences were seen in terms of improvement in inflammatory score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The median survival time for a second implant was 13 and 28 months for the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively (P=0.0028). Eyes with the Ozurdex were 5 times more likely to receive a second implant (P=0.02). No eyes in the Ozurdex group needed additional glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser compared to 44% of eyes in the Retisert group. Eyes with the Retisert implant had a statistically higher rate of having more glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser (P=0.02). In the Ozurdex group, 50% of phakic eyes at baseline had cataract progression and subsequent surgery compared with 100% of Retisert phakic eyes. Eyes with the Retisert implant are 4.7 times more at risk of cataract progression (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant seems comparable to the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant in preventing recurrence of noninfectious uveitis and in improving inflammation and BCVA. However, there were higher rates of cataract progression and need for glaucoma medications, laser, and surgery with the Retisert implant.
Authors: Giulio Barteselli; Payam Amini; Isaac C Ezon; Joseph T Nezgoda; Lingyun Cheng; William R Freeman Journal: Retina Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Edward H Davidson; Eric W Wang; Jenny Y Yu; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Dawn J Wang; Yang Li; Maxine Miller; Wesley N Sivak; Debra Bourne; Hongkun Wang; Mario G Solari; Joel S Schuman; Kia M Washington Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Christopher J Brady; Andrea C Villanti; Hua Andrew Law; Ehsan Rahimy; Rahul Reddy; Pamela C Sieving; Sunir J Garg; Johnny Tang Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-12