Literature DB >> 23297369

On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits.

Jaime L Anderson1, Martin Sellbom, R Michael Bagby, Lena C Quilty, Carlo O C Veltri, Kristian E Markon, Robert F Krueger.   

Abstract

The DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup and their consultants have developed the 220-item, self-report Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for direct assessment of the proposed personality trait system for DSM-5; however, most practicing clinical psychologists will likely continue to rely on separate omnibus measures to index symptoms and traits associated with psychopathology. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is one such measure and assesses the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) domains, which are conceptual cognates of the DSM-5 trait domains. The current study examined the associations between the MMPI-2-RF PSY-5 scales and the DSM-5 trait domains and facets indexed by the PID-5. A clear pattern of convergence was found indicating that each of the PSY-5 scales was most highly correlated with its conceptually expected PID-5 counterpart (rs = .44-.67; Mdn r = .53) and facet correlations generally showed the same pattern. Similarly, when each of the PSY-5 scales was regressed onto the PID-5 domains, the conceptually expected pattern of associations emerged even more clearly. Finally, a joint exploratory factor analysis with the PSY-5 and PID-5 trait facet scales indicated a five-factor solution that clearly resembled both of the PSY-5/DSM-5 trait domains. These results show clear evidence that the MMPI-2-RF has utility in the assessment of dimensional personality traits proposed for the upcoming DSM-5.

Keywords:  DSM-5; MMPI-2-RF; PSY-5; personality disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23297369     DOI: 10.1177/1073191112471141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  25 in total

1.  Pathological personality traits modulate neural interactions.

Authors:  Lisa M James; Brian E Engdahl; Arthur C Leuthold; Robert F Krueger; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  DSM-5 personality traits discriminate between posttraumatic stress disorder and control groups.

Authors:  Lisa M James; Samantha L Anders; Carly K Peterson; Brian E Engdahl; Robert F Krueger; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Personality disorders in DSM-5: emerging research on the alternative model.

Authors:  Leslie C Morey; Kathryn T Benson; Alexander J Busch; Andrew E Skodol
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Examining neural correlates of psychopathology using a lesion-based approach.

Authors:  Matthew Calamia; Kristian E Markon; Matthew J Sutterer; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Personality traits and maladaptivity: Unipolarity versus bipolarity.

Authors:  Trevor F Williams; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2018-01-05

7.  Comparing criterion- and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5.

Authors:  Wern How Yam; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2014-08-11

8.  On the structure of personality disorder traits: conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-01

9.  Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample.

Authors:  Lauren R Few; Joshua D Miller; Alex O Rothbaum; Suzanne Meller; Jessica Maples; Douglas P Terry; Brittany Collins; James MacKillop
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-11

10.  Incremental validity of the PID-5 in relation to the five factor model and traditional polythetic personality criteria of the DSM-5.

Authors:  J Christopher Fowler; Michelle A Patriquin; Alok Madan; Jon G Allen; B Christopher Frueh; John M Oldham
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.