Literature DB >> 23297049

Escaping the recent past: which stimulus dimensions influence proactive interference?

Kimberly S Craig1, Marc G Berman, John Jonides, Cindy Lustig.   

Abstract

Proactive interference occurs when information from the past disrupts current processing and is a major source of confusion and errors in short-term memory (STM; Wickens, Born, & Allen, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2:440-445, 1963). The present investigation examines potential boundary conditions for interference, testing the hypothesis that potential competitors must be similar along task-relevant dimensions to influence proactive interference effects. We manipulated both the type of task being completed (Experiments 1, 2, and 3) and dimensions of similarity irrelevant to the current task (Experiments 4 and 5) to determine how the recent presentation of a probe item would affect the speed with which participants could reject that item. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 contrasted STM judgments, which require temporal information, with semantic and perceptual judgments, for which temporal information is irrelevant. In Experiments 4 and 5, task-irrelevant information (perceptual similarity) was manipulated within the recent probes task. We found that interference from past items affected STM task performance but did not affect performance in semantic or perceptual judgment tasks. Conversely, similarity along a nominally irrelevant perceptual dimension did not affect the magnitude of interference in STM tasks. Results are consistent with the view that items in STM are represented by noisy codes consisting of multiple dimensions and that interference occurs when items are similar to each other and, thus, compete along the dimensions relevant to target selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23297049      PMCID: PMC3683102          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0287-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  35 in total

1.  Confidence in recognition memory for words: dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval.

Authors:  R N Henson; M D Rugg; T Shallice; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model.

Authors:  James S Nairne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference.

Authors:  C Lustig; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming.

Authors:  R N A Henson; M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Interference and forgetting.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case.

Authors:  M C Anderson; B A Spellman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  False memories seconds later: the rapid and compelling onset of illusory recognition.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alexandra S Atkins; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  In search of decay in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; John Jonides; Richard L Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory.

Authors:  Marilyn Cyr; Derek E Nee; Eric Nelson; Thea Senger; John Jonides; Chara Malapani
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-11-12

2.  Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Xu Li; Ziyong Lin; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-08-24

3.  Cognitive control of familiarity: directed forgetting reduces proactive interference in working memory.

Authors:  Sara B Festini; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Long-term effects of interference on short-term memory performance in the rat.

Authors:  Mégane Missaire; Nicolas Fraize; Mickaël Antoine Joseph; Al Mahdy Hamieh; Régis Parmentier; Aline Marighetto; Paul Antoine Salin; Gaël Malleret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The focus of attention is similar to other memory systems rather than uniquely different.

Authors:  Olivia Beaudry; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant; Gerald Tehan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.