Literature DB >> 24323705

Cognitive control of familiarity: directed forgetting reduces proactive interference in working memory.

Sara B Festini1, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz.   

Abstract

Proactive interference (PI) occurs when previously learned information interferes with new learning. In a working memory task, PI induces longer response times and more errors to recent negative probes than to new probes, presumably because the recent probe's familiarity invites a "yes" response. Warnings, longer intertrial intervals, and the increased contextual salience of the probes can reduce but not eliminate PI, suggesting that cognitive control over PI is limited. Here we tested whether control exerted in the form of intentional forgetting performed during working memory can reduce the magnitude of PI. In two experiments, participants performed a working memory task with directed-forgetting instructions and the occasional presentation of recent probes. Surprise long-term memory testing indicated better memory for to-be-remembered than for to-be-forgotten items, documenting the classic directed-forgetting effect. Critically, in working memory, PI was virtually eliminated for recent probes from prior to-be-forgotten lists, as compared to recent probes from prior to-be-remembered lists. Thus cognitive control, when executed via directed forgetting, can reduce the adverse and otherwise persistent interference from familiarity, an effect that we attribute to attenuated memory representations of the to-be-forgotten items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24323705     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0231-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  43 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind.

Authors:  S A Bunge; K N Ochsner; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory.

Authors:  James K Nelson; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Ching-Yune C Sylvester; John Jonides; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; James Neuse; Stephen Madigan; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neural mechanisms of semantic interference and false recognition in short-term memory.

Authors:  Alexandra S Atkins; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  High-speed scanning in human memory.

Authors:  S Sternberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Resolving semantic and proactive interference in memory over the short-term.

Authors:  Alexandra S Atkins; Marc G Berman; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Richard L Lewis; John Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

10.  In search of decay in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; John Jonides; Richard L Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  The visual nonverbal memory trace is fragile when actively maintained, but endures passively for tens of seconds.

Authors:  Denis McKeown; Tom Mercer; Kinga Bugajska; Paul Duffy; Emma Barker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

2.  Changes to information in working memory depend on distinct removal operations.

Authors:  Hyojeong Kim; Harry R Smolker; Louisa L Smith; Marie T Banich; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Inhibition Plasticity in Older Adults: Practice and Transfer Effects Using a Multiple Task Approach.

Authors:  Andrea J Wilkinson; Lixia Yang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.