Literature DB >> 23296323

Response to bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide in children with relapsed medulloblastoma: a multi-institutional experience.

Dolly Aguilera1, Claire Mazewski, Jason Fangusaro, Tobey J MacDonald, Rene Y McNall-Knapp, Laura L Hayes, Sungjin Kim, Robert C Castellino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy for relapsed medulloblastoma has been inadequate, and most patients succumb to disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed nine cases of relapsed medulloblastoma treated with bevacizumab, irinotecan, ± temozolomide. Patients received one to three prior therapeutic regimens. Five patients received 10 mg/kg bevacizumab and 125-150 mg/m(2) irinotecan IV every 2 weeks, with temozolomide, starting at a median dose of 150 mg/m(2) orally for 5 days monthly. Two patients received bevacizumab and irinotecan, but not temozolomide, due to provider preference. Two of nine patients received 15 mg/kg bevacizumab IV, 90 mg/m(2) irinotecan orally for five consecutive days, 100 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide IV for 5 days, and 1.5 mg/m(2) vincristine IV, each administered every 21 days.
RESULTS: Median time to progression was 11 months. Median overall survival was 13 months. Objective tumor response at 3 months was 67 %, including six patients with partial response (PR) and three patients with stable disease (SD). At 6 months, objective response was 55 %, with two patients with PR and three with complete response. Additionally, one patient had SD and three had PD. Two patients remain alive and progression free at 15 and 55 months; another is alive with disease at 20 months. Toxicities included two patients with grade III neutropenia, two with grade III thrombocytopenia, one with grade III elevation of liver function tests, and one patient with grade III diarrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan, with or without temozolomide, produces objective responses with minimal toxicity in children with recurrent medulloblastoma. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296323      PMCID: PMC3963487          DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-2013-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  35 in total

1.  Bevacizumab and irinotecan in the treatment of children with recurrent/refractory medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Dolly G Aguilera; Steward Goldman; Jason Fangusaro
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide.

Authors:  D M Ashley; L Meier; T Kerby; F M Zalduondo; H S Friedman; A Gajjar; L Kun; P K Duffner; S Smith; D Longee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Role of high-dose chemotherapy for recurrent medulloblastoma and other CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

Authors:  Amar Gajjar; Barry Pizer
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  The treatment of medulloblastoma. Results of a prospective randomized trial of radiation therapy with and without CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone.

Authors:  A E Evans; R D Jenkin; R Sposto; J A Ortega; C B Wilson; W Wara; I J Ertel; S Kramer; C H Chang; S L Leikin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  High microvessel density in primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors of childhood.

Authors:  M A Grotzer; R Wiewrodt; A J Janss; H Zhao; A Cnaan; L N Sutton; L B Rorke; P C Phillips
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.947

6.  Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children's Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study.

Authors:  P M Zeltzer; J M Boyett; J L Finlay; A L Albright; L B Rorke; J M Milstein; J C Allen; K R Stevens; P Stanley; H Li; J H Wisoff; J R Geyer; P McGuire-Cullen; J A Stehbens; S B Shurin; R J Packer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Lisa R Bomgaars; Mark Bernstein; Mark Krailo; Richard Kadota; Soma Das; Zhengjia Chen; Peter C Adamson; Susan M Blaney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Martin H Cohen; Yuan Li Shen; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2009-11-06

9.  Microvessel count and cerebrospinal fluid basic fibroblast growth factor in children with brain tumours.

Authors:  V W Li; R D Folkerth; H Watanabe; C Yu; M Rupnick; P Barnes; R M Scott; P M Black; S E Sallan; J Folkman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Surveillance scanning of children with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  C F Torres; S Rebsamen; J H Silber; L N Sutton; L T Bilaniuk; R A Zimmerman; J W Goldwein; P C Phillips; B J Lange
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  29 in total

1.  Safety of bevacizumab in patients younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  N C Millan; M J Poveda; O Cruz; J Mora
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  [Effect of bevacizumab in treatment of children with optic pathway glioma].

Authors:  Wan-Shui Wu; Jing-Jing Liu; Yan-Ling Sun; Shu-Xu DU; Chun-De Li; Miao Li; Si-Qi Ren; Jin Zhang; Xiao-Jun Gong; Li-Ming Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Immunotherapy in pediatric malignancies: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Christian M Capitini; Mario Otto; Kenneth B DeSantes; Paul M Sondel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Treatment of radiation-induced myelopathy with bevacizumab.

Authors:  G Cañedo; I Solis; C González-San Segundo; L Madero; A Lassaletta
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Irinotecan, vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for refractory or relapsed medulloblastoma/PNET in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Hyery Kim; Hyoung Jin Kang; Ji Won Lee; June Dong Park; Kyung Duk Park; Hee Young Shin; Hyo Seop Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Bevacizumab-containing regimen in relapsed/progressed brain tumors: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Amalia Schiavetti; Giulia Varrasso; Maria Giovanna Mollace; Carlo Dominici; Eva Ferrara; Paola Papoff; Claudio Di Biasi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Nathan E Millard; Kevin C De Braganca
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 8.  The rationale for targeted therapies in medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Tobey J MacDonald; Dolly Aguilera; Robert C Castellino
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  18F-FDOPA PET/MRI for monitoring early response to bevacizumab in children with recurrent brain tumors.

Authors:  Karen Gauvain; Maria Rosana Ponisio; Amy Barone; Michael Grimaldi; Ephraim Parent; Hayden Leeds; Manu Goyal; Joshua Rubin; Jonathan McConathy
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2017-05-25

10.  The role of angiogenesis in Group 3 medulloblastoma pathogenesis and survival.

Authors:  Eric M Thompson; Stephen T Keir; Talaignair Venkatraman; Christopher Lascola; Kristen W Yeom; Andrew B Nixon; Yingmiao Liu; Daniel Picard; Marc Remke; Darell D Bigner; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.