Literature DB >> 23295394

Place cell activation predicts subsequent memory.

R Jonathan Robitsek1, John A White, Howard Eichenbaum.   

Abstract

A major quandary in memory research is how hippocampal place cells, widely recognized as elements of a spatial map, contribute to episodic memory, our capacity to remember unique experiences that depends on hippocampal function. Here we recorded from hippocampal neurons as rats performed a T-maze alternation task in which they were required to remember a preceding experience over a delay in order to make a subsequent spatial choice. As it has been reported previously in other variations of this task, we observed differential firing that predicted correct subsequent choices, even as the animal traversed identical locations prior to the choice. Here we also observed that most place cells also fired differently on correct as compared to error trials. Among these cells, a large majority fired strongly before the delay or during the retrieval phase but were less active or failed to activate when the animal subsequently made an error. These findings join the place cell phenomenon with episodic memory performance dependent on the hippocampus, revealing that memory accuracy can be predicted by the activation of single place cells in the hippocampus.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hippocampus; Place cells; Subsequent memory effect

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23295394      PMCID: PMC3644359          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point.

Authors:  Adam Johnson; A David Redish
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Exploring the role of context-dependent hippocampal activity in spatial alternation behavior.

Authors:  James A Ainge; Matthijs A A van der Meer; Rosamund F Langston; Emma R Wood
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Changes in goal selection induced by cue conflicts are in register with predictions from changes in place cell field locations.

Authors:  John L Kubie; Andre Fenton; Nicolay Novikov; David Touretzky; Robert U Muller
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Gradual translocation of spatial correlates of neuronal firing in the hippocampus toward prospective reward locations.

Authors:  Inah Lee; Amy L Griffin; Eric A Zilli; Howard Eichenbaum; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Spatial representations of hippocampal CA1 neurons are modulated by behavioral context in a hippocampus-dependent memory task.

Authors:  Amy L Griffin; Howard Eichenbaum; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sequential-context-dependent hippocampal activity is not necessary to learn sequences with repeated elements.

Authors:  Mark R Bower; David R Euston; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5.

Authors:  G Rees; K Friston; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Goal-related activity in hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  Vincent Hok; Pierre-Pascal Lenck-Santini; Sébastien Roux; Etienne Save; Robert U Muller; Bruno Poucet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hippocampal CA1 place cells encode intended destination on a maze with multiple choice points.

Authors:  James A Ainge; Minija Tamosiunaite; Florentin Woergoetter; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Distinct hippocampal time cell sequences represent odor memories in immobilized rats.

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald; Stephen Carrow; Ryan Place; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  The role of the hippocampus in navigation is memory.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Characterizing context-dependent differential firing activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Michael J Prerau; Paul A Lipton; Howard B Eichenbaum; Uri T Eden
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Hippocampus: remembering the choices.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  On the Integration of Space, Time, and Memory.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Placing memories in context: Hippocampal representations promote retrieval of appropriate memories.

Authors:  David A Bulkin; L Matthew Law; David M Smith
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 8.  Memory: Organization and Control.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  Still searching for the engram.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Memory and Space: Towards an Understanding of the Cognitive Map.

Authors:  Daniela Schiller; Howard Eichenbaum; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Lila Davachi; David J Foster; Stefan Leutgeb; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.