Literature DB >> 23294777

Diabetes connect: an evaluation of patient adoption and engagement in a web-based remote glucose monitoring program.

Kamal Jethwani1, Evelyn Ling, Misbah Mohammed, Khinlei Myint-U, Alexandra Pelletier, Joseph C Kvedar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We determine whether Diabetes Connect (DC), a Web-based diabetes self-management program, can help patients effectively manage their diabetes and improve clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Diabetes Connect is a 12-month program that allows patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to upload their blood glucose readings to a database, monitor trends, and share their data with their providers. To examine the impact of the program, we analyzed patient utilization and engagement data, clinical outcomes, as well as qualitative feedback from current and potential users through focus groups.
RESULTS: We analyzed 75 out of 166 patients. Mean age was 61 years (range 27-87). Patients engaged in DC had an average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change of 1.5%, while nonengaged patients had a HbA1c change of 0.4% (p = .05). Patients with the best outcomes (HbAlc decline of at least 0.8%) typically took less than 10 days to upload, while patients with the worst outcomes (a rise in HbAlc) took an average of 65 days to upload. Patients with more engaged providers had a better HbA1c change (1.39% versus 0.87%) for practices with an average of 74 versus 30 logins/providers.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient engagement in the program has a positive impact on the outcomes of this collaborative Web-based diabetes self-management tool. Patients who engage early and remain active have better clinical outcomes than unengaged patients. Provider engagement, too, was found critical in engaging patients in DC.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23294777      PMCID: PMC3570872          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry.

Authors:  A J Karter; L M Ackerson; J A Darbinian; R B D'Agostino; A Ferrara; J Liu; J V Selby
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.

Authors:  Anthony D Harris; Jessina C McGregor; Eli N Perencevich; Jon P Furuno; Jingkun Zhu; Dan E Peterson; Joseph Finkelstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Evaluating the evidence: is there a rigid hierarchy?

Authors:  P Michael Ho; Pamela N Peterson; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: an update.

Authors:  Nalinee Poolsup; Naeti Suksomboon; Somying Rattanasookchit
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Diabetes connected health: a pilot study of a patient- and provider-shared glucose monitoring web application.

Authors:  Alice J Watson; Joseph C Kvedar; Basmah Rahman; Alexandra C Pelletier; Gregory Salber; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

7.  Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M I Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Kate Lorig; Halsted Holman; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Implementing a web-based home monitoring system within an academic health care network: barriers and facilitators to innovation diffusion.

Authors:  Alexandra C Pelletier; Kamal Jethwani; Heather Bello; Joseph Kvedar; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01
  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  mHealth Intervention Elements and User Characteristics Determine Utility: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Nelson; Shelagh A Mulvaney; Kevin B Johnson; Chandra Y Osborn
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Optimal Use of Diabetes Devices: Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Adherence to Device Use.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Rebecca N Adams; Sarah J Hanes; Regan C Barley; Kellee M Miller; Shelagh A Mulvaney; Korey K Hood
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-10

3.  Adherence to the Use of Home Telehealth Technologies and Emergency Room Visits in Veterans with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jenice Guzman-Clark; Bonnie J Wakefield; Melissa M Farmer; Maria Yefimova; Benjamin Viernes; Martin L Lee; Theodore J Hahn
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 4.  Personalized Technologies in Chronic Gastrointestinal Disorders: Self-monitoring and Remote Sensor Technologies.

Authors:  Muhammad Safwan Riaz; Ashish Atreja
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Patterns of User Engagement with Mobile- and Web-Delivered Self-Care Interventions for Adults with T2DM: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Nelson; Taylor D Coston; Andrea L Cherrington; Chandra Y Osborn
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  The impact of using mobile-enabled devices on patient engagement in remote monitoring programs.

Authors:  Stephen Agboola; Rob Havasy; Khinlei Myint-U; Joseph Kvedar; Kamal Jethwani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

Review 7.  The effect of technology-based interventions on pain, depression, and quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stephen O Agboola; Woong Ju; Aymen Elfiky; Joseph C Kvedar; Kamal Jethwani
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  "Real-world" practical evaluation strategies: a review of telehealth evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen Agboola; Timothy M Hale; Caitlin Masters; Joseph Kvedar; Kamal Jethwani
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-12-17

9.  Smart, Remote, and Targeted Health Care Facilitation Through Connected Health: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sonia Chien-I Chen; Ridong Hu; Rodney McAdam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences.

Authors:  J Harvey; S Dopson; R J McManus; J Powell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.