Literature DB >> 2329394

Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement.

C J Gassmann1, J E Van Sickels, W J Thrash.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P less than .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P less than .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P less than .05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2329394     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.

Authors:  Nanda Kishore Sahoo; Balakrishnan Jayan; Ankur Thakral; Vishvaroop Nagpal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-09-13

Review 2.  The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle.

Authors:  J P Bouwman; D B Tuinzing; P J Kostense; R A van Teeseling; H Mokhtari
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-11

3.  Long-Term Study of Relapse After Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery: Advancement Versus Setback.

Authors:  N K Sahoo; Shiv Shankar Agarwal; Sanjeev Datana; S K Bhandari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

4.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

5.  Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients.

Authors:  Adebimpe O Ibitayo; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  One-year stability of the mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation for correction of the skeletal class II malocclusion and high mandibular plane angle: Dental and skeletal aspect.

Authors:  Muhammad Ruslin; Andi Sitti Hajrah Yusuf; Tymour Forouzanfar; Rokus Barendregt Greebe; Dirk Bram Tuinzing; Sri Astuti Thamrin; Paolo Boffano; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Skeletal Stability after Large Mandibular Advancement (> 10 mm) with Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Skeletal Elastic Intermaxillary Fixation.

Authors:  Kristoffer Schwartz; Maria Rodrigo-Domingo; Thomas Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 8.  Distraction osteogenesis as a treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Wai Kin Tsui; Yanqi Yang; Lim Kwong Cheung; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Lee; Hong-Bum Sohn; Sung-Keun Kim; On-Yu Bae; Jang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.