Literature DB >> 23293924

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and characterization of left atrial catheter ablation lesions: a multicenter experience.

Ross J Hunter1, Daniel A Jones, Redha Boubertakh, Louisa C Malcolme-Lawes, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Christoph F Juli, D Wyn Davies, Nicholas S Peters, Victoria Baker, Mark J Earley, Simon Sporton, L Ceri Davies, Mark Westwood, Steffen E Petersen, Richard J Schilling.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We tested the hypothesis that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can reliably distinguish the presence or absence of left atrial (LA) ablation lesions by blinded analysis of pre- and postablation imaging.
METHODS: Consecutive patients at 2 centers undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by either wide area circumferential radiofrequency ablation (WACA) or ostial ablation with a cryoballoon underwent CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging pre- and 3 months postablation. Imaging was anonymized for blinded analysis of (1) LGE images, and (2) a 3D fusion image with LGE projected onto a segmented LA surface. Scans were categorized using both assessment techniques separately as pre- or postablation, and if postablation, whether lesions were in an ostial or WACA distribution.
RESULTS: LGE imaging was performed in 50 patients (aged 60 ± 10 years, 68% male, 24 underwent WACA and 26 had cryoablation). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of ablation lesions was 60% and 96% on LGE imaging. Sensitivity was higher using 3D fusion imaging (88%; P = 0.003). The proportion in whom lesions were both detected and the distribution correctly assessed as WACA or ostial was higher with 3D fusion imaging compared to LGE imaging (54% vs 28%; P = 0.014). There was no difference in the detection of radiofrequency ablation lesions compared to cryoablation lesions (58% vs 62%; P = 1.000).
CONCLUSION: LGE imaging of atrial scar is not yet sufficiently accurate to reliably identify ablation lesions or to determine lesion distribution.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23293924     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance for prediction of arrhythmogenic areas.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 2.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Novel Interventional Strategies for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Konstantinos C Siontis; Hakan Oral
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: Definition, characterization, and clinical implication.

Authors:  Andreas Goette; Jonathan M Kalman; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph Akar; Jose Angel Cabrera; Shih Ann Chen; Sumeet S Chugh; Domenico Corradi; Andre D'Avila; Dobromir Dobrev; Guilherme Fenelon; Mario Gonzalez; Stephane N Hatem; Robert Helm; Gerhard Hindricks; Siew Yen Ho; Brian Hoit; Jose Jalife; Young-Hoon Kim; Gregory Y H Lip; Chang-Sheng Ma; Gregory M Marcus; Katherine Murray; Akihiko Nogami; Prashanthan Sanders; William Uribe; David R Van Wagoner; Stanley Nattel
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of radiofrequency ablation in the left atrium.

Authors:  Sophinese Iskander-Rizk; Pieter Kruizinga; Antonius F W van der Steen; Gijs van Soest
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Effect of atrial fibrillation ablation on myocardial function: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking analysis.

Authors:  Felix Ceelen; Ross J Hunter; Redha Boubertakh; Wieland H Sommer; Marco Armbruster; Richard J Schilling; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Comparison of left atrial area marked ablated in electroanatomical maps with scar in MRI.

Authors:  Bhrigu R Parmar; Tyler R Jarrett; Nathan S Burgon; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem W Akoum; Nan Hu; Rob S Macleod; Nassir F Marrouche; Ravi Ranjan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 8.  Left Atrial Fibrosis: Role in Atrial Fibrillation Pathophysiology and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  David Spragg
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-04-06

9.  Feasibility of near real-time lesion assessment during radiofrequency catheter ablation in humans using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Tristram D Bahnson; Stephanie A Eyerly; Peter J Hollender; Joshua R Doherty; Young-Joong Kim; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-10

10.  Poor scar formation after ablation is associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Authors:  Bhrigu R Parmar; Tyler R Jarrett; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nan Hu; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche; Ravi Ranjan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.