INTRODUCTION: We tested the hypothesis that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can reliably distinguish the presence or absence of left atrial (LA) ablation lesions by blinded analysis of pre- and postablation imaging. METHODS: Consecutive patients at 2 centers undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by either wide area circumferential radiofrequency ablation (WACA) or ostial ablation with a cryoballoon underwent CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging pre- and 3 months postablation. Imaging was anonymized for blinded analysis of (1) LGE images, and (2) a 3D fusion image with LGE projected onto a segmented LA surface. Scans were categorized using both assessment techniques separately as pre- or postablation, and if postablation, whether lesions were in an ostial or WACA distribution. RESULTS: LGE imaging was performed in 50 patients (aged 60 ± 10 years, 68% male, 24 underwent WACA and 26 had cryoablation). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of ablation lesions was 60% and 96% on LGE imaging. Sensitivity was higher using 3D fusion imaging (88%; P = 0.003). The proportion in whom lesions were both detected and the distribution correctly assessed as WACA or ostial was higher with 3D fusion imaging compared to LGE imaging (54% vs 28%; P = 0.014). There was no difference in the detection of radiofrequency ablation lesions compared to cryoablation lesions (58% vs 62%; P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: LGE imaging of atrial scar is not yet sufficiently accurate to reliably identify ablation lesions or to determine lesion distribution.
INTRODUCTION: We tested the hypothesis that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can reliably distinguish the presence or absence of left atrial (LA) ablation lesions by blinded analysis of pre- and postablation imaging. METHODS: Consecutive patients at 2 centers undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by either wide area circumferential radiofrequency ablation (WACA) or ostial ablation with a cryoballoon underwent CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging pre- and 3 months postablation. Imaging was anonymized for blinded analysis of (1) LGE images, and (2) a 3D fusion image with LGE projected onto a segmented LA surface. Scans were categorized using both assessment techniques separately as pre- or postablation, and if postablation, whether lesions were in an ostial or WACA distribution. RESULTS: LGE imaging was performed in 50 patients (aged 60 ± 10 years, 68% male, 24 underwent WACA and 26 had cryoablation). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of ablation lesions was 60% and 96% on LGE imaging. Sensitivity was higher using 3D fusion imaging (88%; P = 0.003). The proportion in whom lesions were both detected and the distribution correctly assessed as WACA or ostial was higher with 3D fusion imaging compared to LGE imaging (54% vs 28%; P = 0.014). There was no difference in the detection of radiofrequency ablation lesions compared to cryoablation lesions (58% vs 62%; P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: LGE imaging of atrial scar is not yet sufficiently accurate to reliably identify ablation lesions or to determine lesion distribution.
Authors: Andreas Goette; Jonathan M Kalman; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph Akar; Jose Angel Cabrera; Shih Ann Chen; Sumeet S Chugh; Domenico Corradi; Andre D'Avila; Dobromir Dobrev; Guilherme Fenelon; Mario Gonzalez; Stephane N Hatem; Robert Helm; Gerhard Hindricks; Siew Yen Ho; Brian Hoit; Jose Jalife; Young-Hoon Kim; Gregory Y H Lip; Chang-Sheng Ma; Gregory M Marcus; Katherine Murray; Akihiko Nogami; Prashanthan Sanders; William Uribe; David R Van Wagoner; Stanley Nattel Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Sophinese Iskander-Rizk; Pieter Kruizinga; Antonius F W van der Steen; Gijs van Soest Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Felix Ceelen; Ross J Hunter; Redha Boubertakh; Wieland H Sommer; Marco Armbruster; Richard J Schilling; Steffen E Petersen Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Bhrigu R Parmar; Tyler R Jarrett; Nathan S Burgon; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem W Akoum; Nan Hu; Rob S Macleod; Nassir F Marrouche; Ravi Ranjan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-24
Authors: Tristram D Bahnson; Stephanie A Eyerly; Peter J Hollender; Joshua R Doherty; Young-Joong Kim; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-09-10
Authors: Bhrigu R Parmar; Tyler R Jarrett; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nan Hu; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche; Ravi Ranjan Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 1.900