Literature DB >> 23293860

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation does not alter motor surround inhibition.

Anna Sadnicka1, Panagiotis Kassavetis, Tabish A Saifee, Isabel Pareés, John C Rothwell, Mark J Edwards.   

Abstract

Motor surround inhibition (mSI) is one mechanism by which the central nervous system individuates finger movements, and yet the neuroanatomical substrate of this phenomenon is currently unknown. In this study, we examined the role of the cerebellum in the generation of mSI, using transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum (cDC). We also examined intrasubject and intersubject variability of mSI. Twelve subjects completed a three session cross over study in which mSI was measured before and after (0 and 20 minutes) sham, anodal and cathodal cDC. mSI of the surround muscle (adductor digiti minimi) at the onset of flexion of the index finger was consistently observed. Anodal and cathodal cDC did not modulate the magnitude of mSI. For individual subjects (across the three sessions), the intrasubject coefficient of variation was 27%. Between subjects, the intersubject coefficient of variation was 47%. mSI was a stable effect in individual subjects across multiple sessions. This is an important observation and contrasts with other neurophysiological paradigms such as paired associative stimulation response, which exhibit great variability. In addition, we have quantified intrasubject variability of mSI, which will allow future therapeutic studies that attempt to modulate mSI to be adequately powered. We have not found evidence that the cerebellum contributes to the neuroanatomical network needed for the generation of mSI. Understanding the mechanisms of mSI remains a challenge but is important for disorders in which it is deficient such as Parkinson's disease and focal hand dystonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23293860     DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2012.763165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  11 in total

1.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Cerebellar brain inhibition in the target and surround muscles during voluntary tonic activation.

Authors:  Pattamon Panyakaew; Hyun Joo Cho; Prachaya Srivanitchapoom; Traian Popa; Tianxia Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 6.  Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Matteo Ciocca; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Understanding Brain Reorganization in Infants With Perinatal Stroke Through Neuroexcitability and Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Chao-Ying Chen; Michael Georgieff; Jed Elison; Mo Chen; James Stinear; Bryon Mueller; Raghavendra Rao; Kyle Rudser; Bernadette Gillick
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.049

Review 8.  Cerebellar tDCS: how to do it.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Francesca Cortese; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  tDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian C A A Bodranghien; Peter Mariën; Mario U Manto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Voluntary Movement Takes Shape: The Link Between Movement Focusing and Sensory Input Gating.

Authors:  Daniele Belvisi; Antonella Conte; Francesca Natalia Cortese; Matteo Tartaglia; Nicoletta Manzo; Pietro Li Voti; Antonio Suppa; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.