Literature DB >> 23293506

Revisiting the Response Mechanism of Polymeric Membrane Based Heparin Electrodes.

Andrea K Bell1, Lajos Höfler, Mark E Meyerhoff.   

Abstract

Potentiometric membrane electrodes that respond to heparin and other polyanions were introduced in the early 1990s. Herein, the mechanism of polymer membrane electrode type heparin sensors is revisited. The extraction/diffusion of heparin is studied via both potentiometric and impedance spectroscopic techniques using a pre-fractionated heparin preparation that contains polyanionic species > 10000 Daltons. The reversal in EMF response using this heparin preparation indicates diffusion of higher MW heparin fragments to the backside of the membrane. Diffusion coefficients are calculated using a novel formula derived from the phase boundary potential model and Fick's second law of diffusion. Impedance spectroscopy is also employed to show that high MW heparin species are extracted and diffuse across the PVC membranes.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23293506      PMCID: PMC3535306          DOI: 10.1002/elan.201100423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroanalysis        ISSN: 1040-0397            Impact factor:   3.223


  13 in total

1.  2003 Claude S. Hudson Award address in carbohydrate chemistry. Heparin: structure and activity.

Authors:  Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Heparin-responsive electrochemical sensor: a preliminary study.

Authors:  S C Ma; V C Yang; M E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Hyphenated FT-IR-attenuated total reflection and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique to study the water uptake and potential stability of polymeric solid-contact ion-selective electrodes.

Authors:  Tom Lindfors; Lajos Höfler; Gyula Jágerszki; Róbert E Gyurcsányi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  General description of the simultaneous response of potentiometric ionophore-based sensors to ions of different charge.

Authors:  M Nägele; E Bakker; E Pretsch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Voltammetric detection of heparin at polarized blood plasma/1,2-dichloroethane interfaces.

Authors:  Jidong Guo; Yi Yuan; Shigeru Amemiya
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Rotating electrode potentiometry: lowering the detection limits of nonequilibrium polyion-sensitive membrane electrodes.

Authors:  Q Ye; M E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Response mechanism of polymer membrane-based potentiometric polyion sensors.

Authors:  B Fu; E Bakker; J H Yun; V C Yang; M E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Electrochemical recognition of synthetic heparin mimetic at liquid/liquid microinterfaces.

Authors:  Patrick J Rodgers; Ping Jing; Yushin Kim; Shigeru Amemiya
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Electrochemical sensor for heparin: further characterization and bioanalytical applications.

Authors:  S C Ma; V C Yang; M Fu; M E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Rational design of potentiometric trace level ion sensors. A Ag+-selective electrode with a 100 ppt detection limit.

Authors:  Alan Ceresa; Aleksandar Radu; Shane Peper; Eric Bakker; Ernö Pretsch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent improvements to the selectivity of extraction-based optical ion sensors.

Authors:  Kye J Robinson; Yoshiki Soda; Eric Bakker
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Protamine/heparin optical nanosensors based on solvatochromism.

Authors:  Yoshiki Soda; Kye J Robinson; Robin Nussbaum; Eric Bakker
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 9.825

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.