Literature DB >> 23293394

Are Religious Women More Likely to Have Breast Cancer Screening?

Peter H Van Ness1, Stanislav V Kasl, Beth A Jones.   

Abstract

The study objective was to investigate whether women who frequently attend religious services are more likely to have breast cancer screening-mammography and clinical breast examinations-than other women. Multivariate logistic regression models show that white women who attended religious services frequently had more than twice the odds of breast cancer screening than white women who attended less frequently (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.12, 6.06). The behavior of white women was different from African American women (religious attendance-race interaction term p-value = 0.008); African American women who attended religious services frequently were possibly less likely to have breast cancer screening (OR 0.49; CI = 0.19-1.31).

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 23293394      PMCID: PMC3537169          DOI: 10.1023/a:1021174426609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  16 in total

1.  Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research.

Authors:  B D Smedley; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography.

Authors:  J A Stein; S A Fox; P J Murata
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1991-06

3.  Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer?

Authors:  B A Jones; S V Kasl; M G Curnen; P H Owens; R Dubrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cancer in the socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Authors:  H P Freeman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight, United States, 1976-80.

Authors:  M F Najjar; M Rowland
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 11       Date:  1987-10

6.  Coming to terms with advanced breast cancer: black women's narratives from eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  H F Mathews; D R Lannin; J P Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer.

Authors:  D R Lannin; H F Mathews; J Mitchell; M S Swanson; F H Swanson; M S Edwards
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Explanatory models for cancer among African-American women at two Atlanta neighborhood health centers: the implications for a cancer screening program.

Authors:  J Gregg; R H Curry
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The urban church and cancer control: a source of social influence in minority communities.

Authors:  D T Davis; A Bustamante; C P Brown; G Wolde-Tsadik; E W Savage; X Cheng; L Howland
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among African-American women of differing employment status.

Authors:  J M Phillips; J Wilbur
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is religiosity associated with cancer screening? Results from a national survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Anh B Nguyen; Jennifer D Allen; Stephen H Taplin; Richard P Moser
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2015-06

2.  Cancer Screening Among Patients Who Self-Identify as Muslim: Combining Self-Reported Data with Medical Records in a Family Practice Setting.

Authors:  A K Lofters; M Slater; M Vahabi
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-02

Review 3.  Religious Denomination, Religiosity, Religious Attendance, and Cancer Prevention. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König; Linéa Brandt; Helene Rabea Weiss; André Hajek
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-01-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.