20-Hydroxy-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), a product of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed ω-hydroxylation of arachidonic acid, induces oxidative stress and, in clinical studies, is associated with increased body mass index (BMI) and the metabolic syndrome. This study was designed to examine the effects of exogenous 20-HETE on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived adipocytes. The expression levels of CYP4A11 and CYP4F2 (major 20-HETE synthases in humans) in MSCs decreased during adipocyte differentiation; however, exogenous administration of 20-HETE (0.1-1 μM) increased adipogenesis in a dose-dependent manner in these cells (P < 0.05). The inability of a 20-HETE analog to reproduce these effects suggested the involvement of a metabolic product of 20-HETE in mediating its pro-adipogenic effects. A cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 selective inhibitor enhanced, whereas a COX-2 selective or a dual COX-1/2 inhibitor attenuated adipogenesis induced by 20-HETE. The COX-derived metabolite of 20-HETE, 20-OH-PGE₂, enhanced adipogenesis and lipid accumulation in MSCs. The pro-adipogenic effects of 20-HETE and 20-OH-PGE₂ resulted in the increased expression of the adipogenic regulators PPARγ and β-catenin in MSC-derived adipocytes. Taken together we show for the first time that 20-HETE-derived COX-2-dependent 20-OH-PGE₂ enhances mature inflamed adipocyte hypertrophy in MSC undergoing adipogenic differentiation.
20-Hydroxy-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), a product of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed ω-hydroxylation of arachidonic acid, induces oxidative stress and, in clinical studies, is associated with increased body mass index (BMI) and the metabolic syndrome. This study was designed to examine the effects of exogenous 20-HETE on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived adipocytes. The expression levels of CYP4A11 and CYP4F2 (major 20-HETE synthases in humans) in MSCs decreased during adipocyte differentiation; however, exogenous administration of 20-HETE (0.1-1 μM) increased adipogenesis in a dose-dependent manner in these cells (P < 0.05). The inability of a 20-HETE analog to reproduce these effects suggested the involvement of a metabolic product of 20-HETE in mediating its pro-adipogenic effects. A cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 selective inhibitor enhanced, whereas a COX-2 selective or a dual COX-1/2 inhibitor attenuated adipogenesis induced by 20-HETE. The COX-derived metabolite of 20-HETE, 20-OH-PGE₂, enhanced adipogenesis and lipid accumulation in MSCs. The pro-adipogenic effects of 20-HETE and 20-OH-PGE₂ resulted in the increased expression of the adipogenic regulators PPARγ and β-catenin in MSC-derived adipocytes. Taken together we show for the first time that 20-HETE-derived COX-2-dependent 20-OH-PGE₂ enhances mature inflamed adipocyte hypertrophy in MSC undergoing adipogenic differentiation.
Metabolic dysfunction of adipose tissue due to oxidative stress is considered the cause
of several complications of obesity, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease (1–3). Dysfunctional adipocytes are associated with the development of insulin
resistance, hyperglycemia, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and arterial hypertension, and they
favor a prothrombotic and proinflammatory state (4, 5). Oxidative stress in adipose
tissue regulates adipogenic response with adipocyte hypertrophy (6, 7). Adipocyte
dysfunction is caused by a variety of stimuli, including heavy metals, reactive oxygen
species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), Ang II, and cytokines. The localized inflammation with
increased macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue leads to important changes in
adipocyte gene expression, with downstream effects on adipocyte lipid metabolism and
altered endocrine function (7). Adipocyte
differentiation (adipogenesis) is a complex process that includes coordinated changes in
hormone sensitivity and gene expression in response to various stimuli, including lipid
mediators (8).20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), a product of the cytochrome P450
(CYP)-catalyzed ω-hydroxylation of arachidonic acid, is a primary eicosanoid in
the microcirculation that plays a role in the regulation of vascular tone and renal
tubular homeostasis (9–12). Perturbations in the levels of 20-HETE in
tissues and biological fluids have been observed in multiple pathological states,
including hypertension, kidney disease, and metabolic syndrome (13–17). 20-HETE
stimulates production of superoxide and inflammatory cytokines, inhibits endothelial
nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and increases oxidative stress (18–20), suggesting
a possible role for 20-HETE in the regulation of adipogenesis (21).Prostaglandins (PG) are known to play a variety of roles in adipocytes and precursor
cells that utilize the arachidonate cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway to generate PGs at
different stages of the life cycle of adipocytes (8). COX consists of two isozymes, COX-1 and COX-2, and is the rate-limiting
enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid into PGs by specific PG
synthases (22). COX-1 is constitutively
expressed in most cells, including adipocytes, whereas COX-2 is induced in response to
various stimuli, such as cytokines and oxidative stress (23). COX-2 expression is transiently enhanced in the early phase
of adipogenesis. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and prostaglandin F2a
(PGF2α) are anti-adipogenic factors that suppress the
differentiation of adipocytes (23). Arachidonic
acid metabolism during adipogenesis is a process governed at multiple levels, suggesting
a complex role for PGs during fat cell development (24). The relative contribution of COX-1 and COX-2 to the regulation of
adipogenesis remains to be resolved.20-HETE plays an important role in inducing oxidative stress (21), and as such, we hypothesize that 20-HETE affects
adipogenesis. We examined adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), multipotent
stromal cells that can be induced to differentiate into adipocytes (25). 20-HETE is also a substrate for COX
metabolites; hence, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of
20-HETE and its COX-derived metabolites to the regulation of adipogenesis. The results
of this study suggest that COX-derived 20-HETE metabolites are a potential therapeutic
target in the treatment of obesity and its associated disease states: hypertension, the
metabolic syndrome, and diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Human bone marrow-derived MSC differentiation into adipocytes
Frozen bone marrow mononuclear cells were purchased from Allcells (Emeryville,
CA). After thawing, mononuclear cells were resuspended in an α-minimal
essential medium (α-MEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10%
heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen) and 1% antibiotics and
antimycotic (Invitrogen). The cells were plated at a density of 1–5
× 106 cells per 100 cm2 dish. The cultures were
maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The medium was changed
after 48 h and every 3–4 days thereafter. When the MSCs were confluent,
the cells were recovered by the addition of 0.25% trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen).
MSCs (passage 2–3) were plated in either a 75 cm2 flask or a
24-well plate and cultured in α-MEM with 20% FBS up to a density of 2.0
× 104 cells/cm2. The medium was replaced with
adipogenic medium, and the cells were cultured for an additional 14 days. The
adipogenic media consisted of complete culture medium supplemented with
DMEM-high glucose, 10% (v/v) FBS, 10 µg/ml insulin, 0.5 mM dexamethasone
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 1% antibiotics and antimycotic (Invitrogen)
in the presence and absence of the COX-1 inhibitor (2-valeryloxybenzoic acid,
Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI) and the COX-2 inhibitor
(3-(4-methylsulphonylphenyl)-4-phenyl-5-trifluoromethylisoxazol, Cayman) with
and without 20-HETE, 20-HETE agonist (20-5,14-HEDE), or 20-OH-PGE2.
20-HETE, 20-HETE agonist, or 20-OH-PGE2 were added three times a week
at concentrations of 0.1 and 1 μM. Inhibitors of COX-1 and COX-2 were added
three times a week at a dose of 100 and 5 μM, respectively.
Oil Red O staining
At day 14 of adipogenesis, 0.21% Oil Red O in 100% isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) was used. Briefly, adipocytes were fixed in 10% formaldehyde,
washed in Oil Red O for 10 min, rinsed with 60% isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich).
Then the Oil Red O was eluted by adding 100% isopropanol for 10 min, and OD was
measured at 490 nm for 0.5 s reading. MSC-derived adipocytes were measured by
Oil Red O staining (OD = 490 nm) after day 14. Each value of Oil Red O
staining was normalized by the cell number.
Adipocyte size
Lipid droplets were measured using an ImagePro Analyzer (Media Cybernetics
Corporation, Silver Springs, MD). The MSC-derived adipocytes were treated with
increasing concentration of 20-OH-PGE2 (1–1,000 nM) every alternate day
for 14 days. To quantify the number and size of the lipid droplets in these
images, a proprietary algorithm (patent pending) was developed that segments
circular staining patterns. The algorithm was then applied to images obtained
from the lipid optical channel for cells exposed to different doses of
20-OH-PGE2.
mRNA isolation and real-time PCR quantification
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according
to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with
Roche reverse transcription reagents. Total RNA (0.5–1 μg) was analyzed
by real-time PCR. The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
was performed with the TaqMan gene expression assay on an Applied Biosystems
7500 fast real-time PCR system according to the manufacturer's recommended
protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Each reaction was run in
triplicate. The comparative threshold cycle (CT) method was used to calculate
the amplification fold as specified by the manufacturer.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis of adipocyte cell lysate was carried out as described
previously (6, 26). Briefly, cells were placed in a homogenization
buffer, and homogenates were centrifuged at 27,000 g for 10 min
at 4°C. The supernatant was used for the measurement of COX-1, COX-2,
PPARγ, Mest, and β-catenin protein levels (27, 28). The
levels were quantified by scanning densitometry using an imaging densitometer,
normalized to the levels of total protein.
PGE2 measurement
PGE2 levels were determined in the culture supernatant. Multiple
assays were conducted for quantification of the proteins (AssayGate Inc.,
Ijamsville, MD). All measurements were performed in triplicate.
Statistical analyses
Statistical significance between experimental groups was determined by the Fisher
method of analysis of multiple comparisons (P < 0.05 was
regarded as significant). For comparison between treatment groups, the null
hypothesis was tested by either a single-factor ANOVA for multiple groups or the
unpaired t-test for two groups. Data are presented as mean
± SEM. Differences between experimental groups were evaluated with ANOVA
with Bonferroni corrections. Statistical significance was regarded as
significant at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
CYP4-ω-hydroxylase and COX expression during adipogenesis
The expression levels of CYP4-ω-hydroxylases were determined in MSC before
and after completion of adipogenesis as shown in . MSC expressed relatively high mRNA
levels of CYP4A11 and CYP4F2 (the major 20-HETE producing
CYP4-ω-hydroxylases in humans) (17) before the start of adipogenic differentiation. In adipocytes
derived from MSC, mRNA levels of these hydroxylases were nearly undetectable. To
evaluate COX activity in MSC exposed to adipogenic environment, PGE2
levels were determined in conditioned media (Fig. 1C). COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors decreased PGE2
levels compared with levels in the conditioned media without indomethacin.
Addition of indomethacin, which is a dual COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor, further
decreased PGE2 levels (Fig.
1C).
Fig. 1.
Levels of mRNA for (A) Cyp4F11 and (B) Cyp4F2 and (C) levels of
PGE2 in MSC before and after adipogenic differentiation
(adipocytes). Data are expressed as means ± SE.
*P < 0.05 versus MSC,
#P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
+P < 0.05 versus COX-1 or COX-2
inhibitor.
Levels of mRNA for (A) Cyp4F11 and (B) Cyp4F2 and (C) levels of
PGE2 in MSC before and after adipogenic differentiation
(adipocytes). Data are expressed as means ± SE.
*P < 0.05 versus MSC,
#P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
+P < 0.05 versus COX-1 or COX-2
inhibitor.
Effect of 20-HETE and COX inhibition on adipogenesis
The effect of 20-HETE on lipid accumulation in MSC-derived adipocytes was
examined in the presence and the absence of either a COX-1 or COX-2 inhibitor.
20-HETE enhanced lipid accumulation in cells exposed to a COX-1 inhibitor but
not in cells exposed to COX-2 inhibitor (). The absence of such an effect of 20-HETE
in cells treated with a COX-2 inhibitor alludes to the role of COX-2-derived
20-HETE metabolic product in mediating these enhanced lipogenic effects (Fig. 2). The direct effect of 20-HETE on
lipid accumulation in MSCs derived adipocytes was further refuted by the
inability of a 20-HETE agonist [sodium
2-((5Z,14Z)-20-hydroxyicosa-5,14-dienamido)acetate, 20-HEDE] to mimic the
effects of exogenous 20-HETE as shown in . Results show that in presence of COX-1 and
COX-2 inhibitors, the 20-HETE agonist 20-HEDE had no significant effect on
adipogenesis, thus further substantiating the notion that a COX-2-derived
metabolic product has an enhanced adipogenic effect. Subsequently, addition of
the microsomal PGE2 synthase inhibitor CAY10526 abolished the adipogenic effect
of 20-HETE in the presence of a COX-1 inhibitor (). Arachidonic acid, which can also be
metabolized consecutively by CYP and COX enzymes to a similar product, was less
potent than 20-HETE; it had no effect at 0.1 and 1 µM, and at 10 µM,
it increased lipid accumulation by 20% (data not shown).
Fig. 2.
Effect of 20-HETE on adipogenesis in the presence and absence of
indomethacin, COX-1 inhibitor (valeroyl salicylate), and COX-2 inhibitor
(CAY10404). Adipogenesis was measured as the relative absorbance of Oil
Red O at day 14 after inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials
and Methods. Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05
versus vehicle.
Fig. 3.
Effect of a 20-HETE agonist on adipogenesis in the presence and absence
of COX-1 or COX-2 inhibitor. Adipogenesis was measured as the relative
absorbance of Oil Red O at day 14 after inducing adipogenesis as
described in Materials and Methods. Mean ± SE.
Fig. 4.
Effect of 20-HETE on adipogenesis in the presence and absence of COX-1
inhibitor, COX-2 inhibitor, and the PGE2 synthase inhibitor (CAY10526).
Adipogenesis was measured as the relative absorbance of Oil Red O at day
14 after inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials and Methods.
Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
#P < 0.05 versus control.
Effect of 20-HETE on adipogenesis in the presence and absence of
indomethacin, COX-1 inhibitor (valeroyl salicylate), and COX-2 inhibitor
(CAY10404). Adipogenesis was measured as the relative absorbance of Oil
Red O at day 14 after inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials
and Methods. Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05
versus vehicle.Effect of a 20-HETE agonist on adipogenesis in the presence and absence
of COX-1 or COX-2 inhibitor. Adipogenesis was measured as the relative
absorbance of Oil Red O at day 14 after inducing adipogenesis as
described in Materials and Methods. Mean ± SE.Effect of 20-HETE on adipogenesis in the presence and absence of COX-1
inhibitor, COX-2 inhibitor, and the PGE2 synthase inhibitor (CAY10526).
Adipogenesis was measured as the relative absorbance of Oil Red O at day
14 after inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials and Methods.
Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
#P < 0.05 versus control.
Effect of 20-hydroxy-PGE2 on adipogenesis and adipocyte
hypertrophy
Previous studies have shown that 20-HETE is metabolized by COX to
20-OH-endoperoxides and consequently to 20-OH-PGE2 (29, 30). Therefore, we examined the effects of 20-OH-PGE2 on
adipogenesis in the presence or absence of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors.
20-OH-PGE2 stimulated (P < 0.05) adipogenesis
4-fold as measured by lipid accumulation (). Neither COX-1 nor COX-2 inhibitor, alone
or together, prevented 20-OH-PGE2-mediated increase in adipogenesis,
suggesting a COX-independent action of this metabolite (Fig. 5). The effect of 20-OH-PGE2 was
concentration dependent (). It significantly increased lipid accumulation at 50 nM
and had maximal effect at 500 nM. Moreover, addition of PGE2 blunted
the adipogenic activity of 20-OH-PGE2; PGE2 (10 nM)
inhibited the adipogenic activity of 20-OH-PGE2 (500 nM) by 40% as
evidenced by a reduction in lipid accumulation measured as absorbance of Oil Red
O from 0.38 ± 0.02 to 0.23 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05).
In addition, 20-OH-PGE2 stimulated adipocyte hypertrophy as measured
by lipid droplet size. As seen in Fig.
6B, lipid droplet size increased 2- and 3-fold in response to 100 and
1,000 nM of 20-OH-PGE2. These results strongly suggest that the COX-2
metabolite 20-hydroxy-PGE2 plays a significant role in inducing
adipogenesis and that its effect may be antagonized by PGE2.
Fig. 5.
Effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on adipogenesis in the presence and
absence of COX-1 inhibitor and/or COX-2 inhibitor. Adipogenesis was
measured as the relative absorbance of Oil Red O at day 14 after
inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials and Methods. Mean
± SE, *P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
#P < 0.05 versus control.
Fig. 6.
(A) Concentration-dependent effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on
adipogenesis. Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05
versus 1 nM concentration of 20-OH-PGE2. (B) Effect of
20-OH-PGE2 on adipocyte size. Mean ± SE,
*P < 0.05, and
**P < 0.01 versus control.
Effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on adipogenesis in the presence and
absence of COX-1 inhibitor and/or COX-2 inhibitor. Adipogenesis was
measured as the relative absorbance of Oil Red O at day 14 after
inducing adipogenesis as described in Materials and Methods. Mean
± SE, *P < 0.05 versus vehicle,
#P < 0.05 versus control.(A) Concentration-dependent effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on
adipogenesis. Mean ± SE, *P < 0.05
versus 1 nM concentration of 20-OH-PGE2. (B) Effect of
20-OH-PGE2 on adipocyte size. Mean ± SE,
*P < 0.05, and
**P < 0.01 versus control.
Effect of 20 HETE and 20-OH- PGE2 on adipogenic markers
We examined the effects of 20-HETE and 20-OH-PGE2 on β-catenin,
PPARγ, and Mest expression as adipogenic differentiation markers, in the
presence and absence of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors (). Densitometry analysis showed that
the expression of PPARγ and Mest (Fig. 7A,
B, respectively) was significantly increased in the presence of
20-OH-PGE2 when the cells were treated with COX-1 or COX-2
inhibitor or both. In contrast, β-catenin expression significantly
decreased in the presence of 20-OH-PGE2 when the cells were treated
with COX-1 or COX-2 inhibitor or both (Fig.
7C). Similar data were obtained with 20-HETE, except that in the
presence of a COX-2 inhibitor, the effect was blunted (data not shown).
Fig. 7.
Effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on adipogenic markers. Expression of (A)
PPARγ, (B) Mest, and (C) β-catenin was determined by Western
blot analysis in MSC-derived adipocytes. Quantitative densitometry
evaluation of the proteins ratio was determined. Data are expressed as
means ± SE, *P < 0.05 versus
corresponding conditions without 20-OH-PGE2.
Effect of 20-OH-PGE2 on adipogenic markers. Expression of (A)
PPARγ, (B) Mest, and (C) β-catenin was determined by Western
blot analysis in MSC-derived adipocytes. Quantitative densitometry
evaluation of the proteins ratio was determined. Data are expressed as
means ± SE, *P < 0.05 versus
corresponding conditions without 20-OH-PGE2.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we demonstrated the stimulatory effect of exogenous 20-HETE on
lipid accumulation in MSC-derived adipocytes. 20-HETE, a metabolic product of
ω-hydroxylases, is produced in physiologically relevant amounts by various
tissues and cells, including the vascular wall and hemopoeitic cells (29–31). 20-HETE has been shown to contribute to the regulation of vascular
tone and control of blood pressure. Interestingly, along with its potent
vasoconstrictor capacity, 20-HETE has been shown to mediate cellular proliferation
(32, 33), angiogenesis (34, 35), oxidative stress (19), and inflammation (18), all of which may contribute importantly to the process of
adipogenesis. Metabolic imbalance, frequently accompanying pathophysiological
conditions traditionally associated with enhanced 20-HETE synthesis, was the focus
of this study. The ω-Hydroxylase expression declined in hMSCs as they
differentiated into adipocytes, thus limiting their autocrine exposure to
endogenously generated 20-HETE. This may be a consequence of in vitro cell culturing
conditions. The ability of adipose tissue to produce 20-HETE needs to be further
assessed. Nevertheless, this does not preclude nonadipocyte sources of this
eicosanoid, including 20-HETE from the vascular smooth muscle cells of the arteries
vascularizing the adipose tissues (10,
11, 13, 14) as well as 20-HETE from
circulating blood cells (36, 37). We showed a dose-dependent adipogenic
response to 20-HETE in hMSCs, which was characterized by increased adipocyte
hypertrophy and increased lipid accumulation. These findings highlight a potential
role for 20-HETE in promoting lipid accumulation, which in turn has been strongly
linked to adipocyte dysfunction and disruption of energy balance.The inability of a 20-HETE analog to reproduce the enhanced adipogenic effects of
20-HETE led us to examine the hypothesis that a catabolic product of 20-HETE may be
responsible for mediating these effects. 20-HETE is a known substrate for COX-2 with
the resultant formation of 20-OH-PGG2 (30). Human MSCs have an abundance of microsomal PGE synthase (mPGES-1),
the product of which, PGE2, is an inhibitor of adipogenesis (38). Findings in this study suggested that a
COX-2-dependent 20-HETE metabolite, most probably 20-OH-PGE2, appears to
mediate the adipogenic effect of 20-HETE on hMSCs-derived adipocytes. Blockade of
the adipogenic effects of 20-HETE by a selective inhibitor of COX-2 or a specific
mPGES-1 inhibitor supports this theory. In addition, administration of
20-OH-PGE2 had a similar effect on hMSCs to that observed during
20-HETE treatment. 20-OH-PGE2 could also be synthesized by the sequential
metabolism of arachidonic acid by COX and ω-hydroxylases; however, this seems
unlikely due to the nearly absent expression of ω-hydroxylases in maturing
adipocytes.Our hypothesis that the metabolic product of 20-HETE, most likely
20-OH-PGE2, is primarily a derivative of COX-2 stems from the
observation that 20-HETE has no measurable effects on lipid accumulation on
adipocytes undergoing COX-2 blockade, either alone or in combination with COX-1
blockade. Absence of a stimulatory effect of 20-HETE on hMSC-derived adipocytes in
the absence of any COX blockade indicates the reciprocal effects of arachidonic
acid-derived PGE2 and 20-HETE-derived 20-OH-PGE2.
PGE2 inhibits adipogenesis, and for this reason, in vitro analysis of
adipogenesis is traditionally carried out in a setting of COX blockade. We propose
that the COX-2-derived metabolic product of 20-HETE counteracts the anti-adipogenic
effects of PGE2. The source of PGE2 appears to be
predominantly COX-1, as the basal level of adipogenesis is far greater in the
presence of a COX-1 inhibitor than in the presence of a COX-2 inhibitor. The
combination treatment of hMSCs with COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors does not lead to
increased adipogenesis compared with cells undergoing COX-1 blockade alone, further
strengthening the notion that the inhibitory eicosanoidPGE2 is
principally a catabolic product of COX-1.Our proposal of the occurrence of reciprocal effects of PGE2 and 20-OH
PGE2 on adipogenesis in hMSCs is strengthened by the demonstrations
of a rightward shift of the dose-dependent adipogenic response in cells concurrently
exposed to low concentrations of exogenous PGE2. The adipogenic activity
of 20-HETE and 20-OH-PGE2 was associated with a marked increase in the expression of
two major pro-adipogenic factors, PPARγ and Mest, and a decrease in
β-catenin, which is a key anti-adipogenic regulator (39). 20-HETE and its metabolites were implicated as
PPARγ activators (40, 41). In addition to increasing lipid
accumulation, 20-HETE also enhanced hMSC COX-2 expression, which could provide a
microenvironment more conducive to the formation of 20-OH-PGE2. It is
possible that 20-HETE and/or 20-OH-PGE2 stimulate transcription activation of the
PPARγ receptor and thereby set in motion a pro-adipogenic program that is
further evidenced by increasing the expression of Mest and suppressing
β-catenin. Additional studies are needed to fully identify the precise
mechanisms of action of this eicosanoid.20-HETE has been shown to increase in experimental models of diabetes and obesity
(42). The clinical relevance of 20-HETE
as a pro-adipogenic agent has been suggested in several studies. A report by Laffer
et al. (15) showed a correlation between
levels of 20-HETE and circulating insulin in essential hypertension with obesity.
Croft and colleagues showed a significant correlation between 20-HETE levels and
BMI, as well as with oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive
individuals (43–46). A recent study in our laboratory examined associations
between circulating 20-HETE levels and the function of endothelial progenitor cells
in diabetic and nondiabeticpatients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery. This study
found that levels of 20-HETE are significantly elevated in diabeticpatients and
that 20-HETE correlated with BMI in both diabetic and nondiabeticpatients (47). Taken together, these studies and the
current findings suggest that 20-HETE may play an important role in the regulation
of adipose tissue.In conclusion, we characterize a pro-adipogenic role of 20-HETE in adipocytes that
appears to be mediated by a COX-2-dependent catabolic product. Additional analysis
suggested that the mediator in question is 20-OH-PGE2. 20-OH-PGE2 could
serve as an antagonist to the PGE2-dependent anti-adipogenic effects and
contribute toward adipocyte hypertrophy and dysfunctional adipogenesis frequently
associated with pathophysiological conditions, such as the metabolic syndrome. A
selective COX-2 inhibitor could ablate these effects and could, in part, be used
therapeutically in the fight against these chronic pathological conditions.
Authors: Ping Chen; Meng Guo; Dana Wygle; Paul A Edwards; John R Falck; Richard J Roman; A Guillermo Scicli Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Miao Jiang; Alexandre Mezentsev; Rowena Kemp; Kihwan Byun; John R Falck; Joseph M Miano; Alberto Nasjletti; Nader G Abraham; Michal Laniado-Schwartzman Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-12-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Natalie C Ward; Jennifer Rivera; Jonathan Hodgson; Ian B Puddey; Lawrie J Beilin; John R Falck; Kevin D Croft Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M M Muthalif; I F Benter; N Karzoun; S Fatima; J Harper; M R Uddin; K U Malik Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Cheryl L Laffer; Michal Laniado-Schwartzman; Alberto Nasjletti; Fernando Elijovich Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-01-05 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Stephen J Peterson; Joseph I Shapiro; Ellen Thompson; Shailendra Singh; Lu Liu; Jeremy A Weingarten; Kathleen O'Hanlon; Angelica Bialczak; Siddharth R Bhesania; Nader G Abraham Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Igor V Kizub; Anand Lakhkar; Vidhi Dhagia; Sachindra R Joshi; Houli Jiang; Michael S Wolin; John R Falck; Sreenivasulu Reddy Koduru; Ramu Errabelli; Elizabeth R Jacobs; Michal L Schwartzman; Sachin A Gupte Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Debebe Gebremedhin; David X Zhang; Koryn A Carver; Nicole Rau; Kevin R Rarick; Richard J Roman; David R Harder Journal: Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 3.072
Authors: Ankit Gilani; Varunkumar Pandey; Victor Garcia; Kevin Agostinucci; Shailendra P Singh; Joseph Schragenheim; Lars Bellner; John R Falck; Mahesh P Paudyal; Jorge H Capdevila; Nader G Abraham; Michal Laniado Schwartzman Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 3.619