PURPOSE: To investigate the combined use of hyperoxia-inducedΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) as a noninvasive imaging biomarker of tumor hypoxia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on rat GH3 prolactinomas (n = 6) and human PC3 prostate xenografts (n = 6) propagated in nude mice. multiple gradient echo and inversion recovery truefisp images were acquired from identical transverse slices to quantify tumor R(2) * and R(1)before and during carbogen (95% O2 /5% CO2 ) challenge, and correlates of ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) assessed. RESULTS: Mean baseline R(2) * and R(1) were 119 ± 7 s(-1) and 0.6 ± 0.03 s(-1) for GH3 prolactinomas and 77 ± 12 s(-1) and 0.7 ± 0.02 s(-1) for PC3 xenografts, respectively. During carbogen breathing, mean ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) were -20 ± 8 s(-1) and 0.08 ± 0.03 s(-1) for GH3 and -0.5 ± 1 s(-1) and 0.2 ± 0.08 s(-1) for the PC3 tumors, respectively. A pronounced relationship betweenΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) was revealed. CONCLUSION: Considering the blood oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curve, fast R2 * suggested that GH3 prolactinomas were more hypoxic at baseline, and their carbogen response dominated by increased hemoglobin oxygenation, evidenced by highly negative ΔR(2) *. PC3 tumors were less hypoxic at baseline, and their response to carbogen dominated by increased dissolved oxygen, evidenced by highly positive ΔR(1) . Because the two biomarkers are sensitive to different oxygenation ranges, the combination of ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) may better characterize tumor hypoxia than each alone.
PURPOSE: To investigate the combined use of hyperoxia-inducedΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) as a noninvasive imaging biomarker of tumor hypoxia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on ratGH3prolactinomas (n = 6) and humanPC3 prostate xenografts (n = 6) propagated in nude mice. multiple gradient echo and inversion recovery truefisp images were acquired from identical transverse slices to quantify tumor R(2) * and R(1)before and during carbogen (95% O2 /5% CO2 ) challenge, and correlates of ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) assessed. RESULTS: Mean baseline R(2) * and R(1) were 119 ± 7 s(-1) and 0.6 ± 0.03 s(-1) for GH3prolactinomas and 77 ± 12 s(-1) and 0.7 ± 0.02 s(-1) for PC3 xenografts, respectively. During carbogen breathing, mean ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) were -20 ± 8 s(-1) and 0.08 ± 0.03 s(-1) for GH3 and -0.5 ± 1 s(-1) and 0.2 ± 0.08 s(-1) for the PC3 tumors, respectively. A pronounced relationship betweenΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) was revealed. CONCLUSION: Considering the blood oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curve, fast R2 * suggested that GH3prolactinomas were more hypoxic at baseline, and their carbogen response dominated by increased hemoglobin oxygenation, evidenced by highly negative ΔR(2) *. PC3 tumors were less hypoxic at baseline, and their response to carbogen dominated by increased dissolved oxygen, evidenced by highly positive ΔR(1) . Because the two biomarkers are sensitive to different oxygenation ranges, the combination of ΔR(2) * and ΔR(1) may better characterize tumor hypoxia than each alone.
Authors: Donghan M Yang; Tatsuya J Arai; James W Campbell; Jenifer L Gerberich; Heling Zhou; Ralph P Mason Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Dawen Zhao; Jesús Pacheco-Torres; Rami R Hallac; Derek White; Peter Peschke; Sebastian Cerdán; Ralph P Mason Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Derek A White; Zhang Zhang; Li Li; Jeni Gerberich; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Peter Peschke; Ralph P Mason Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Heling Zhou; Rami R Hallac; Qing Yuan; Yao Ding; Zhongwei Zhang; Xian-Jin Xie; Franto Francis; Claus G Roehrborn; R Douglas Sims; Daniel N Costa; Ganesh V Raj; Ralph P Mason Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2017-08-24
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Jessica K R Boult; Yann Jamin; Muhammad Babur; Katherine G Finegan; Kaye J Williams; Ross A Little; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Andrew R Reynolds; John C Waterton; Simon P Robinson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Florence Colliez; Marta M Safronova; Julie Magat; Nicolas Joudiou; André P Peeters; Bénédicte F Jordan; Bernard Gallez; Thierry Duprez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 3.240