Literature DB >> 19625736

Hip arthroscopy for labral tears: review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up.

Atul F Kamath1, Roger Componovo, Keith Baldwin, Craig L Israelite, Charles L Nelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopy of the hip joint is a relatively new diagnostic and therapeutic option for labral tears.
PURPOSE: More data are needed to characterize the utility and effectiveness of hip arthroscopy and identify patient-related factors that might predict functional outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: This retrospective study with prospective follow-up examined the clinical outcomes of 52 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for labral tears. Outcomes measures included clinical outcome and the modified Harris hip score. Any complications associated with the procedure were recorded. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years or prior ipsilateral hip surgery.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 42 years. Mean follow-up was 4.8 years. Twenty-one patients (40.4%) had a traumatic cause of the labral tears. Eight patients (15.4%) had possible secondary gain issues. Four (7.7%) patients suffered transient nerve palsies; in 1 case, the guide wire broke during initial cannulation. Three patients (5.8%) went on to total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy. On multivariate analysis, left-sided surgery, a higher preoperative activity level, and duration of symptoms greater than 18 months were found to be positive predictors of good or excellent outcomes. Smoking and secondary gain issues were significant negative predictors of good or excellent outcomes. Only prior level of activity was a significant positive predictor of return to activity after surgery. A traumatic cause of the labral tear was a significant negative predictor of return to activity. Chondromalacia and osteoarthritis were not significant predictors of negative outcome. Postoperative modified Harris hip score improved 40% from 56.8 preoperatively to 80.4 (P < .001). No cases of patients with secondary gain issues achieved good or excellent outcomes. Overall percentage of good or excellent outcomes was 56%, or 66% when those with secondary gain issues were excluded; 84% of patients were able to return to sports or equivalent level of preoperative recreational activity. Neither preoperative radiographic osteoarthritis nor grade of intraoperative chondromalacia predicted postoperative outcome.
CONCLUSION: This series supports the hypothesis that hip arthroscopy provides safe and reliable improvement of labral symptoms in the majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625736     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509333078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  25 in total

1.  Post-operative opiate requirements after hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Damien P Byrne; Kim Hunter; Kevin J Mulhall
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroscopic debridement of the isolated Ligamentum Teres rupture.

Authors:  Barak Haviv; John O'Donnell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy?

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Bryan T Jarrett; Olumide Ojeifo; Jo Ann Lee; Charles R Bragdon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reliability and agreement of hip range of motion and provocative physical examination tests in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Devyani M Hunt; Karen Steger-May; Vinta Mathew; John C Clohisy
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Early experience with a comprehensive hip preservation service intended to improve clinical care, education, and academic productivity.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki; Jill A Erickson; Lucas A Anderson; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Kevin J Campbell; Katharine J Wilson; Robert F LaPrade; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Management of a large acetabular chondrolabral injury in a young patient with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Thomas I Sherman; John J Marcel; William Postma
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Karen K Briggs; John C Carlisle; Diana C Patterson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip osteoarthritis: systematic review of outcomes and progression to hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joanne L Kemp; David MacDonald; Natalie J Collins; Anna L Hatton; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Is the Actual Failure Rate of Hip Arthroscopy Higher Than Most Published Series? An Analysis of a Private Insurance Database.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Baron; Robert W Westermann; Nicholas A Bedard; Michael C Willey; T S Lynch; Kyle R Duchman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.