Literature DB >> 20840593

Modularity and scaling in fast movements: power amplification in mantis shrimp.

Thomas Claverie1, Elliot Chan, Sheila N Patek.   

Abstract

Extremely fast animal actions are accomplished with mechanisms that reduce the duration of movement. This process is known as power amplification. Although many studies have examined the morphology and performance of power-amplified systems, little is known about their development and evolution. Here, we examine scaling and modularity in the powerful predatory appendages of a mantis shrimp, Gonodactylaceus falcatus (Crustacea, Stomatopoda). We propose that power-amplified systems can be divided into three units: an engine (e.g., muscle), an amplifier (e.g., spring), and a tool (e.g., hammer). We tested whether these units are developmentally independent using geometric morphometric techniques that quantitatively compare shapes. Additionally, we tested whether shape and several mechanical features are correlated with size and sex. We found that the morphological regions that represent the engine, amplifier, and tool belong to independent developmental modules. In both sexes, body size was positively correlated with the size of each region. Shape, however, changed allometrically with appendage size only in the amplifier (both sexes) and tool (males). These morphological changes were correlated with strike force and spring force (amplifier), but not spring stiffness (amplifier). Overall, the results indicate that each functional unit belongs to different developmental modules in a power-amplified system, potentially allowing independent evolution of the engine, amplifier, and tool.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20840593     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Mechanical sensitivity and the dynamics of evolutionary rate shifts in biomechanical systems.

Authors:  Martha M Muñoz; Philip S L Anderson; S N Patek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Springs, steroids, and slingshots: the roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 3.  Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolution of a high-performance and functionally robust musculoskeletal system in salamanders.

Authors:  Stephen M Deban; Jeffrey A Scales; Segall V Bloom; Charlotte M Easterling; Mary Kate O'Donnell; Jeffrey P Olberding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Extremely fast feeding strikes are powered by elastic recoil in a seahorse relative, the snipefish, Macroramphosus scolopax.

Authors:  Sarah J Longo; Tyler Goodearly; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Conserved but flexible modularity in the zebrafish skull: implications for craniofacial evolvability.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Young H Son; Amelie Crespel; Davide Thambithurai; Shaun Killen; Matthew P Harris; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Moving in fast waters: the exaggerated claw gape of the New River crayfish (Cambarus chasmodactlyus) aids in locomotor performance.

Authors:  Zackary A Graham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Lake Malawi cichlid evolution along a benthic/limnetic axis.

Authors:  C D Hulsey; R J Roberts; Y-H E Loh; M F Rupp; J T Streelman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multimodal signals: ultraviolet reflectance and chemical cues in stomatopod agonistic encounters.

Authors:  Amanda M Franklin; N Justin Marshall; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Shooting Mechanisms in Nature: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aimée Sakes; Marleen van der Wiel; Paul W J Henselmans; Johan L van Leeuwen; Dimitra Dodou; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.