Literature DB >> 23291658

Impact of chemotherapy sequencing on local-regional failure risk in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy.

Elizabeth A Mittendorf1, Thomas A Buchholz, Susan L Tucker, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Henry M Kuerer, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Isabelle Bedrosian, Gildy V Babiera, Karen Hoffman, Min Yi, Merrick I Ross, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Kelly K Hunt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate long-term local-regional control rates after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for patients undergoing surgery before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: There were 2983 patients who underwent segmental mastectomy with whole-breast irradiation from 1987 to 2005. Clinicopathological and outcome data were reviewed, and comparisons were made between those undergoing surgery before and those undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: There were 2331 patients (78%) who underwent surgery first and 652 (22%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had more advanced disease at baseline and more adverse clinicopathological features. The 5- and 10-year local-regional recurrence (LRR)-free survival rates were 97% [95% confidence interval (CI), 96-98) and 94% (95% CI, 93-95) for surgery first and 93% (95% CI, 91-95) and 90% (95% CI, 87-93) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences in LRR-free survival rates when comparing the presenting clinical stage (P = NS). Of 607 patients presenting with clinical stage II/III disease, chemotherapy downstaged 313 patients (52%) to pathological stage 0/I disease; 294 (48%) had residual stage II/III disease. In multivariate analysis, an age less than 50 years, clinical stage III, grade 3, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease, estrogen receptor-positive disease without receipt of endocrine therapy, lymphovascular invasion, multifocal disease on pathology, and close/positive margins were associated with LRR. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significant when added to the model. Adjusting for adverse factors, there were no differences in LRR between patients who underwent surgery before and those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: LRR after BCT is driven by tumor biology and disease stage. Appropriately selected patients can achieve high rates of local-regional control with BCT with either upfront surgery or surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291658      PMCID: PMC6058313          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182805c4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J S D Mieog; J A van der Hage; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Florentia Peintinger; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; S E Singletary; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Aman U Buzdar; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Neslihan Cabioglu; Kelly K Hunt; Aysegul A Sahin; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; S Eva Singletary; Gary J Whitman; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS).

Authors:  L Mauriac; G MacGrogan; A Avril; M Durand; A Floquet; M Debled; J M Dilhuydy; F Bonichon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Preoperative FLAC/granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  David N Danforth; Kenneth Cowan; Rosemary Altemus; Maria Merino; Catherine Chow; Arlene Berman; Usha Chaudhry; Craig Shriver; Seth M Steinberg; JoAnne Zujewski
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Bryant; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; A Brown; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; A DeCillis; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov; H D Bear
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthew M Poggi; David N Danforth; Linda C Sciuto; Sharon L Smith; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Cynthia Menard; Marc E Lippman; Allen S Lichter; Rosemary M Altemus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience.

Authors:  Allen M Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Howard D Thames; Mary Jane Oswald; Elesyia D Outlaw; Eric A Strom; Marsha D McNeese; Henry M Kuerer; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary; Fredrick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Aysegul A Sahin; George H Perkins; Naomi R Schechter; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  24 in total

1.  Locoregional risk assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer: clinical utility of the CPS + EG score.

Authors:  Laura L Michel; Laura Sommer; Rosa González Silos; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Alexandra von Au; Julia Seitz; André Hennigs; Katharina Smetanay; Michael Golatta; Jörg Heil; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Andreas Schneeweiss; Frederik Marmé
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Surgical Considerations After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Breast Conservation Therapy.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2015-05

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-background for the indication of locoregional treatment.

Authors:  David Krug; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Does the time from diagnostic biopsy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect the rate of pathologic complete response in stages I-III breast cancer?

Authors:  D Le; M Eslami; H Li; O Hajjaj; S Chia; C Simmons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Neoadjuvant Management of Early Breast Cancer: A Clinical and Investigational Position Statement.

Authors:  Ramon Colomer; Cristina Saura; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Tomás Pascual; Isabel T Rubio; Octavio Burgués; Lourdes Marcos; César A Rodríguez; Miguel Martín; Ana Lluch
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-01

6.  Breast and colorectal cancer recurrence and progression captured by five U.S. population-based registries: Findings from National Program of Cancer Registries patient-centered outcome research.

Authors:  Trevor D Thompson; Lori A Pollack; Christopher J Johnson; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Judy R Rees; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Randi Rycroft; MaryBeth Culp; Reda Wilson; Manxia Wu; Kevin Zhang; Vicki Benard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-term morbidity in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas B Abt; José M Flores; Pablo A Baltodano; Karim A Sarhane; Francis M Abreu; Carisa M Cooney; Michele A Manahan; Vered Stearns; Martin A Makary; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Long term outcomes reporting the safety of breast conserving therapy compared to mastectomy: 20-year results of EORTC 10801.

Authors:  Dalliah M Black; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2013-08

9.  Surgical patterns of care in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast magnetic resonance imaging: results of a secondary analysis of TBCRC 017.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; E Shelley Hwang; Alan Cantor; Mehra Golshan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Janet K Horton; Rita Nanda; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Cliff A Hudis; Ingrid Meszoely; Jennifer F De Los Santos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  When to Add Additional Anti-HER2 Therapy to Adjuvant Trastuzumab.

Authors:  Alexandra S Zimmer; Neelima Denduluri
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.