Literature DB >> 23291644

Reading laterally: the cerebral hemispheric use of spatial frequencies in visual word recognition.

Karine Tadros1, Nicolas Dupuis-Roy, Daniel Fiset, Martin Arguin, Frédéric Gosselin.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the left hemisphere (LH) is more capable for reading than the right hemisphere (RH). Left hemifield presentations (initially processed by the RH) lead to a globally higher error rate, slower word identification, and a significantly stronger word length effect (i.e., slower reaction times for longer words). Because the visuo-perceptual mechanisms of the brain for word recognition are primarily localized in the LH (Cohen et al., 2003), it is possible that this part of the brain possesses better spatial frequency (SF) tuning for processing the visual properties of words than the RH. The main objective of this study is to determine the SF tuning functions of the LH and RH for word recognition. Each word image was randomly sampled in the SF domain using the SF bubbles method (Willenbockel et al., 2010) and was presented laterally to the left or right visual hemifield. As expected, the LH requires less visual information than the RH to reach the same level of performance, illustrating the well-known LH advantage for word recognition. Globally, the SF tuning of both hemispheres is similar. However, these seemingly identical tuning functions hide important differences. Most importantly, we argue that the RH requires higher SFs to identify longer words because of crowding.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291644     DOI: 10.1167/13.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

2.  Processing deficits for familiar and novel faces in patients with left posterior fusiform lesions.

Authors:  Daniel J Roberts; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Esther Kim; Marie-Josephe Tainturier; Pelagie M Beeson; Steven Z Rapcsak; Anna M Woollams
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Evidence for Separate Contributions of High and Low Spatial Frequencies during Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Kurt Winsler; Phillip J Holcomb; Katherine J Midgley; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.

Authors:  Amanda Estéphan; Daniel Fiset; Camille Saumure; Marie-Pier Plouffe-Demers; Ye Zhang; Dan Sun; Caroline Blais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Relationship between Vision-Related Quality of Life and Central 10° of the Binocular Integrated Visual Field in Advanced Glaucoma.

Authors:  Yoshio Yamazaki; Kenji Sugisaki; Makoto Araie; Hiroshi Murata; Akiyasu Kanamori; Toshihiro Inoue; Shinichiro Ishikawa; Keiji Yoshikawa; Hidetaka Maeda; Yuko Yamada; Akira Negi; Masaru Inatani; Hidenobu Tanihara; Satoshi Okinami; Kenji Mizuki; Koichi Mishima; Kenichi Uchida; Shun Matsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The role of spatial frequencies for facial pain categorization.

Authors:  Isabelle Charbonneau; Joël Guérette; Stéphanie Cormier; Caroline Blais; Guillaume Lalonde-Beaudoin; Fraser W Smith; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.