Literature DB >> 23291550

Predictive models for Escherichia coli concentrations at inland lake beaches and relationship of model variables to pathogen detection.

Donna S Francy1, Erin A Stelzer, Joseph W Duris, Amie M G Brady, John H Harrison, Heather E Johnson, Michael W Ware.   

Abstract

Predictive models, based on environmental and water quality variables, have been used to improve the timeliness and accuracy of recreational water quality assessments, but their effectiveness has not been studied in inland waters. Sampling at eight inland recreational lakes in Ohio was done in order to investigate using predictive models for Escherichia coli and to understand the links between E. coli concentrations, predictive variables, and pathogens. Based upon results from 21 beach sites, models were developed for 13 sites, and the most predictive variables were rainfall, wind direction and speed, turbidity, and water temperature. Models were not developed at sites where the E. coli standard was seldom exceeded. Models were validated at nine sites during an independent year. At three sites, the model resulted in increased correct responses, sensitivities, and specificities compared to use of the previous day's E. coli concentration (the current method). Drought conditions during the validation year precluded being able to adequately assess model performance at most of the other sites. Cryptosporidium, adenovirus, eaeA (E. coli), ipaH (Shigella), and spvC (Salmonella) were found in at least 20% of samples collected for pathogens at five sites. The presence or absence of the three bacterial genes was related to some of the model variables but was not consistently related to E. coli concentrations. Predictive models were not effective at all inland lake sites; however, their use at two lakes with high swimmer densities will provide better estimates of public health risk than current methods and will be a valuable resource for beach managers and the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291550      PMCID: PMC3591947          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02995-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

1.  Surveillance for waterborne disease outbreaks and other health events associated with recreational water --- United States, 2007--2008.

Authors:  Michele C Hlavsa; Virginia A Roberts; Ayana R Anderson; Vincent R Hill; Amy M Kahler; Maureen Orr; Laurel E Garrison; Lauri A Hicks; Anna Newton; Elizabeth D Hilborn; Timothy J Wade; Michael J Beach; Jonathan S Yoder
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2011-09-23

2.  Decadal and shorter period variability of surf zone water quality at Huntington Beach, California.

Authors:  A B Boehm; S B Grant; J H Kim; S L Mowbray; C D McGee; C D Clark; D M Foley; D E Wellman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Assessing pathogen risk to swimmers at non-sewage impacted recreational beaches.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Detection of low numbers of Salmonella in environmental water, sewage and food samples by a nested polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  A S Waage; T Vardund; V Lund; G Kapperud
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Comparison of three enrichment media for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from foods.

Authors:  C L Baylis; S MacPhee; K W Martin; T J Humphrey; R P Betts
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Lisa D Kalischuk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Development of a multiplex PCR approach for the identification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains and their major virulence factor genes.

Authors:  J Osek
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Comparison of traditional and molecular analytical methods for detecting biological agents in raw and drinking water following ultrafiltration.

Authors:  D S Francy; R N Bushon; A M G Brady; E E Bertke; C M Kephart; C A Likirdopulos; B E Mailot; F W Schaefer; H D Alan Lindquist
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L A Khatib; Y L Tsai; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Evaluation of an alternative IMS dissociation procedure for use with Method 1622: detection of Cryptosporidium in water.

Authors:  Michael W Ware; Larry Wymer; H D Alan Lindquist; Frank W Schaefer
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.363

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Interplay Between Predation, Competition, and Nutrient Levels Influences the Survival of Escherichia coli in Aquatic Environments.

Authors:  P Wanjugi; G A Fox; V J Harwood
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Predicting Salmonella populations from biological, chemical, and physical indicators in Florida surface waters.

Authors:  Rachel McEgan; Gabriel Mootian; Lawrence D Goodridge; Donald W Schaffner; Michelle D Danyluk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Interpretability Versus Accuracy: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models Built Using Different Algorithms, Performance Measures, and Features to Predict E. coli Levels in Agricultural Water.

Authors:  Daniel L Weller; Tanzy M T Love; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-05-14

4.  Landscape, Water Quality, and Weather Factors Associated With an Increased Likelihood of Foodborne Pathogen Contamination of New York Streams Used to Source Water for Produce Production.

Authors:  Daniel Weller; Alexandra Belias; Hyatt Green; Sherry Roof; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Front Sustain Food Syst       Date:  2020-02-06

5.  Within-day variability in microbial concentrations at a UK designated bathing water: Implications for regulatory monitoring and the application of predictive modelling based on historical compliance data.

Authors:  Mark D Wyer; David Kay; Huw Morgan; Sam Naylor; Simon Clark; John Watkins; Cheryl M Davies; Carol Francis; Hamish Osborn; Sarah Bennett
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-11-03

6.  Predictive Models May Complement or Provide an Alternative to Existing Strategies for Assessing the Enteric Pathogen Contamination Status of Northeastern Streams Used to Provide Water for Produce Production.

Authors:  Daniel L Weller; Tanzy M T Love; Alexandra Belias; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Front Sustain Food Syst       Date:  2020-10-06

7.  Systematic review of predictive models of microbial water quality at freshwater recreational beaches.

Authors:  Cole Heasley; J Johanna Sanchez; Jordan Tustin; Ian Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of E. coli Concentrations in Agricultural Pond Waters: Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Matthew D Stocker; Yakov A Pachepsky; Robert L Hill
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-11

9.  Region-Specific Associations between Environmental Factors and Escherichia coli in Freshwater Beaches in Toronto and Niagara Region, Canada.

Authors:  Johanna Sanchez; Jordan Tustin; Cole Heasley; Mahesh Patel; Jeremy Kelly; Anthony Habjan; Ryan Waterhouse; Ian Young
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.