Literature DB >> 23290427

Evaluation of e-mail contact to conduct follow-up among adolescent women participating in a longitudinal cohort study of contraceptive use.

Sadia Haider1, Laura E Dodge, Beth A Brown, Michele R Hacker, Tina R Raine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether e-mail contact is a viable method for gathering information from adolescent women about contraceptive use. STUDY
DESIGN: Adolescent women initiating contraception followed in a prospective longitudinal cohort study and who had access to the Internet were randomized to the control or intervention arm and were contacted at 3, 6 and 12 months after enrollment. The control arm completed follow-up surveys in-person or by telephone. The intervention arm received Web-based surveys via e-mail.
RESULTS: There were 46 women in each group. Women in both groups were approximately 20 years old, were sexually active minority women, and were in school or employed. While participants in the intervention group initially had lower response rates than those in the control group (59% vs. 91%, respectively), with the addition of traditional follow-up methods, the overall response rates were comparable (94% vs. 91%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: E-mail follow-up with Web-based surveys was effective amongst adolescent women at risk for unintended pregnancy. This indicates that e-mail contact could be used as a preliminary follow-up strategy to capture a substantial proportion of participants and that standard follow-up can be used as a second-line approach. A two-pronged approach with initial e-mail contact and traditional follow-up for participants who do not respond may be a viable method when evaluating sensitive areas such as contraceptive use.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290427      PMCID: PMC3756229          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide.

Authors:  M Brodie; R E Flournoy; D E Altman; R J Blendon; J M Benson; M D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study.

Authors:  Resiti T Mangunkusumo; Peter W Moorman; Annelette E Van Den Berg-de Ruiter; Johan Van Der Lei; Harry J De Koning; Hein Raat
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Feasibility and efficacy of a binge drinking prevention intervention for college students delivered via the Internet versus postal mail.

Authors:  Michele Johnson Moore; Jessie Soderquist; Chudley Werch
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

4.  Feasibility, acceptability, and quality of Internet-administered adolescent health promotion in a preventive-care setting.

Authors:  Rt Mangunkusumo; J Brug; Js Duisterhout; Hj de Koning; H Raat
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-05-19

5.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

6.  One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives.

Authors:  Tina R Raine; Anne Foster-Rosales; Ushma D Upadhyay; Cherrie B Boyer; Beth A Brown; Abby Sokoloff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Internet and email use among STD clinic patients.

Authors:  Karen E Mark; Anna Wald; Linda Drolette; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Cauane Blumenberg; Aluísio J D Barros
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  We should really keep in touch: predictors of the ability to maintain contact with contraception clinical trial participants over 12 months.

Authors:  Leah N Torres; David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Janet C Jacobson; Amna I Dermish; Katherine Ward
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Evaluation of two intervention models on contraceptive attitudes and behaviors among nulliparous women in Shanghai, China: a clustered randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuan He; Ning Zhang; Jue Wang; Na He; Yan Du; Jing-Xin Ding; Ying Zhang; Xiao-Tian Li; Jian Huang; Ke-Qin Hua
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Population-Based Survey Methods for Reaching Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents.

Authors:  Ann S Hamilton; Xueyan Zhuang; Denise Modjeski; Rhona Slaughter; Anamara Ritt-Olson; Joel Milam
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 1.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.