Literature DB >> 23290352

Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients.

Hossein Masoomi1, Ruihong Luo, Steven Mills, Joseph C Carmichael, Anthony J Senagore, Michael J Stamos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nickel-titanium compression anastomosis ring device (ColonRing, NiTi Surgical Solutions, Netanya, Israel) has been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006 to construct gastrointestinal anastomoses. We evaluated the anastomotic leak rate after end-to-end anastomosis using the ColonRing device.
METHODS: Using a multinational (16 countries), multicenter (178 centers) data registry provided by NiTi Surgical Solutions, Netanya, Israel, we retrospectively examined clinical data of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open left-sided colectomy and anterior resection from January 2008 to June 2010.
RESULTS: A total of 1,180 patients underwent end-to-end anastomosis using the ColonRing device during the study period. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.22% (38 patients). The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (range 2 to 21 days). The median ring expulsion time was 8 days. The earliest ring expulsion time was 6 days; however, in 1 patient, the ring did not expel. In 4 patients, the anastomosis had to be immediately recreated because of 1 misfiring and 3 incomplete anastomoses.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the ColonRing device is feasible and safe and could be considered an alternative technology for end-to-end colorectal anastomosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290352     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R Tabola; R Cirocchi; A Fingerhut; A Arezzo; J Randolph; V Grassi; G A Binda; V D'Andrea; I Abraha; G Popivanov; S Di Saverio; A Zbar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A modular magnetic anastomotic device for minimally invasive digestive anastomosis: proof of concept and preliminary data in the pig model.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Didier Mutter; Véronique Lindner; Michel Vix; Hyunsoo Chung; Nicolas Demartines; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A A P Slesser; G Pellino; O Shariq; D Cocker; C Kontovounisios; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Impact of omentoplasty on anastomotic leak and septic complications after low pelvic anastomosis: a study from the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Volkan Ozben; Gokhan Ozuner; Ozgen Isik; Emre Gorgun; Luca Stocchi; Xiaobo Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Protection of colorectal anastomosis with an intraluminal bypass device for patients undergoing an elective anterior resection: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Reshef; G Ben-Arie; I Pinsk
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

9.  Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis.

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Tamara Braunschmid; Shahbaz Ghaffari; Stefan Riss; Anton Stift; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Efficacy and safety of a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring for end-to-end anastomosis compared with conventional staplers: A real-world analysis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhenhai Lu; Jianhong Peng; Cong Li; Fulong Wang; Wu Jiang; Wenhua Fan; Junzhong Lin; Xiaojun Wu; Desen Wan; Zhizhong Pan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.